Prediction of River Discharge at Ungaged Sites with Analysis of Uncertainty
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 119, Issue 4
Abstract
A technique is outlined for assigning uncertainty to the estimation of cumulative probability distribution functions (flow‐duration curves) for river discharge at ungaged sites. Data from existing stage‐discharge gaging stations are used to determine a best‐fit exponent for the adjustment of gaged data to a site within the watershed, and to estimate the uncertainty associated with said adjustment. Average annual discharge is shown to be a good indicator of the required adjustment and uncertainty of cumulative probability distribution functions, especially when applied to mean expected discharge through a water‐development project. The distribution of the actual values around the predicted is log‐normal, with a simple power relationship between discharge and drainage area describing the median values. In this paper, the application is to flow‐duration curves for the addition of hydropower capacity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Fennessey, N., and Vogel, R. M. (1990). “Regional flow duration curves for ungages sites in Massachusetts.” J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., 116(4), 530–549.
2.
Ford, A., and McKay, M. D. (1985). “Quantifying uncertainty in energy model forecasts.” Energy Systems and Policy, 9(3), 217–247.
3.
Foster, H. A. (1924). “Theoretical frequency curves and their application to engineering problems.” Trans. ASCE, 7, 142–203.
4.
Foster, H. A. (1934). “Flow duration curve.” Trans. ASCE, 99, 1213–1267.
5.
Goidechea, A., Krouse, M. R., and Antle, L. G. (1982). “An approach to risk and uncertainty in benefit‐cost analysis of water resource project.” Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 791–799.
6.
Gulliver, J. S. (1991). “Preliminary studies: hydrology, hydraulics, and costs.” Hydropower engineering handbook, J. S. Gulliver and R. E. A. Arndt, eds., McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
7.
Gupta, R. S. (1989). Hydrology and hydraulic systems. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
8.
Murdock, R. V., and Gulliver, J. S. (1991). “Hydroproject risk analysis.” Proc., Waterpower '91, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
9.
Riggs, H. C. (1972). “Low flow investigations.” U.S. Geological Survey techniques of water resources investigations‐book 4, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
10.
Searcy, J. K. (1959). “Flow‐duration curves.” Manual of hydrology: part 2. low‐flow techniques: U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1542‐A, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
11.
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., and Foufoula‐Georgiou, E. (1991). “Frequency analysis of extreme events.” Handbook of hydrology, D. R. Maidment, ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
12.
Woods, J., and Gulliver, J. (1990). “Economic analysis of energy projects with uncertainty.” J. Energy Engrg., ASCE, 116(1), 1–16.
13.
Woods, J., and Gulliver, J. S. (1991). “Economic and financial analysis.” Hydropower engineering handbook, J. Gulliver and R. E. A. Arndt, eds., McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 119 • Issue 4 • July 1993
Pages: 473 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 15, 1992
Published online: Jul 1, 1993
Published in print: Jul 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.