Discussion of “New Methods for Aquifer Parameters from Slug Test Data” by Sushil K. Singh
This article is a reply.
VIEW THE ORIGINAL ARTICLEThis article is a reply.
VIEW THE ORIGINAL ARTICLEPublication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 2
0733-9437(2009)135:2(264)/asset/df9af821-a3e8-49a5-9b25-591dd163c886/assets/(asce)0733-9437(2009)135:2(264).fp.png)
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASTM. (2006a). “Standard test method for determining transmissivity of nonleaky confined aquifers by overdamped response to instantaneous change in head (D4104).” ASTM annual CDs of standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2006b). “Standard test method for determining transmissivity and storativity of low permeability rocks by in situ measurements using the pressure pulse technique (D4631)” ASTM annual CDs of standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Penn.
Bouwer, H. (1989). “Bouwer and Rice slug test—An update.” Ground Water, 27, 304–309.
Bouwer, H., and Rice, R. C. (1976). “A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells.” Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 423–428.
Bredehoeft, J. D., and Papadopulos, S. S. (1980). “A method for determining the hydraulic properties of tight formations.” Water Resour. Res., 16, 233–238.
Butler, J. J., Jr. (1998). The design, performance, and analysis of slug tests, Lewis, London.
Carslaw, H. S., and Jaeger, J. C. (1959). Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Amen House, London.
Chapuis, R. P. (1998). “Overdamped slug test in monitoring wells: review of interpretation methods with mathematical, physical and numerical analysis of storativity influence.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(5), 697–719.
Chapuis, R. P. (1999). “Borehole variable-head permeability tests in compacted clay liners and covers.” Can. Geotech. J., 36(1), 39–51.
Chapuis, R. P. (2007). “References on field permeability tests performed in boreholes and monitoring wells.” Rep., EPM-RT-2007-04, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, 18, ⟨http://www.polymtl.ca/biblio/epmrt/rapports/rt2007-04.pdf⟩.
Chapuis, R. P., and Cazaux, D. (2002). “Pressure-pulse test for field hydraulic conductivity of soils: Is the usual interpretation method adequate?” Evaluation and remediation of low and dual porosity environments, Special Technical Publication STP 1415, M. N. Sara and L. G. Everett, eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 66–82.
Chapuis, R. P., and Chenaf, D. (2002). “Slug tests in a confined aquifer: Experimental results in a large soil tank and numerical modeling.” Can. Geotech. J., 39(1), 14–21.
Cooper, H. H., Jr., Bredehoeft, J. D., and Papadopulos, I. S. (1967). “Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous change of water.” Water Resour. Res., 3(1), 263–269.
Hvorslev, M. J. (1951). “Time-lag and soil permeability in ground water observations.” Bull. 36, U.S. Army Engng Waterways Exp. Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
Poirier, S. E., DeGroot, D. J., and Ostendorf, D. W. (2004). “Field measurement of hydraulic conductivity in a clayey sand drumlin.” Proc., 57th Can. Geotech. Conf. and 5th Joint IAH-CNC-CGS Conf., Québec, Session 7B, 1–8.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 135 • Issue 2 • April 2009
Pages: 264 - 265
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 5, 2007
Accepted: Mar 12, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.