SCS Runoff Equation Revisited for Variable-Source Runoff Areas
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 3
Abstract
Simple methods for predicting runoff from watersheds are important in engineering practice, particularly in flood forecasting and water-balance calculation. In this paper, we illustrate that the often used SCS runoff curve-number approach in its most elementary form can be derived from assuming that only the saturated areas contribute to direct runoff. With this approach the initial abstraction or the amount of water required before runoff starts is equal to air-filled pore space per unit area for the most shallow soil in the watershed. Air-filled pore space throughout the year was calculated with aid of the simple water balance employing the Thornthwaite-Mather procedure for the most shallow soil in the watershed. By plotting the effective precipitation defined as the amount of precipitation minus the initial abstraction against the observed runoff for two watersheds in Australia and three in the northeastern United States we found that the SCS curve-number equation in its elementary form fitted the data well.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Boughton, W. C.(1987). “Evaluating partial areas of watershed runoff.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 113(3), 356–366.
2.
Boughton, W. C.(1990). “Systematic procedure for evaluating partial areas of watershed runoff.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 116(1), 83–98.
3.
Dickinson, W. T., and Whiteley, H. (1970). “Watershed areas contributing to runoff.”Proc., Wellington Symp. on the Results of Res. on Representative and Experimental Basins, IASH Pub. No. 96., IASH-Unesco, Paris, France, 12–26.
4.
Dunne, T., and Black, R. D. (1970a). “An experimental investigation of runoff production in permeable soils.”Water Resour. Res. 6(2), 478–499.
5.
Dunne, T., and Black, R. D. (1970b). “Partial area contributing to storm runoff in a small New England watershed.”Water Resour. Res. 6(5), 1296–1311.
6.
Gburek, W. J. (1977). “The Mahantango Creek watershed—general hydrology and research results.”Water research in Eastern North America, D. L. Correll, ed., Smithsonian Institution, Washingon, D.C., 227–250.
7.
Hawkins, R. H.(1979). “Runoff curve numbers from partial area watersheds.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., ASCE, 105(4), 375–389.
8.
Hewlett, J. D., and Hibbert, A. R. (1967). “Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid area.”Proc., Int. Symp. on Forest Hydrol., W. E. Sopper and H. W. Lull, eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 275–290.
9.
Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H. (1982). Hydrology for engineers . McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y., 204–215.
10.
Rallison, R. E. (1980). “Origin and evolution of the SCS runoff equation.”Symp. on Watershed Mgmt., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 912–924.
11.
Steenhuis, T. S., Muck, R. E., and Walter, M. F. (1984). “Prediction of water budgets for soils with or without a hardpan.”Proc., Am. Soc. Agric. Engrs. Adv. in Infiltration Conf., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich., 350–363.
12.
Steenhuis, T. S., and van der Molen, W. H. (1986). The Thornthwaite-Mather procedure as a simple engineering method to predict recharge.”J. Hydrol., 84, 221–229.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 1, 1995
Published in print: May 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.