Civil-Engineering Education: Alternative Paths
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 12
Abstract
Education in civil and hydraulic engineering has undergone only evolutionary change in the past half-century. During that time the salary levels of civil engineers, including hydraulic engineers, have markedly decreased in comparison with nonengineering professions and even compared to other engineering disciplines. Presently, the mode of engineering education is being challenged, with many proposing to increase the educational requirement for professional engineers. Calls for a 5-year first professional degree in the United States have become popular. However, such a change is insufficient and will not cure the current problems. To promote professionalism and to remedy other concerns now plaguing civil engineering, two alternative paths are proposed for civil engineering education. One path is to broaden professional engineering education by offering a 6-year undergraduate program of study as an option to the present 4-year undergraduate program. The alternative path is to broaden the purpose of graduate engineering study to include practice-oriented programs aimed at producing doctorate-level engineering professionals, rather than engineering academics. Both paths emphasize an integrated, broad education, but not at the expense of technical depth. And both directly affect the education of hydraulic engineers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J. A. (1991). “Professionalism and marketing of civil engineering profession.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 117(1), 10–20.
2.
Alexander, J. A. (1993). “Digger's decline: A fable for civil engineers.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE 119(3).
3.
American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). ( 2001). “2000 edition of profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges.” Washington, D.C., 〈http://www.asee.org/publications/colleges/default.cfm〉.
4.
ASCE. ( 1999). “1999 Civil engineering degree data: April 2000.” Reston, Va.
5.
Publ. of Engrg. Workforce Commission of Am. Assn. of Engrg. Soc., 6(1), 2.
6.
Ettema, R. (2000). “Adrift in the curriculum.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 126(1), 21–26.
7.
Liggett, J. A. (2002). “What is hydraulic engineering?”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 128(2).
8.
Liggett, J. A., and Caughey, D. A. ( 1998). Fluid mechanics: An interactive text, ASCE, New York.
9.
Lovell, E. B. ( 1908). “Five year engineering course.” Cornell Civ. Engrg., 17(5) 145.
10.
Michael, H. L. ( 1989). “Attracting students to a professional career in transportation engineering.” Proc., 75th Annu. Road School, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., March 7–9, 4–15.
11.
Rodenhuis, G. S. ( 1996). “Present and future perspectives in hydroinformatics.” Issues and directions in hydraulics, Nakato & Ettema, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
12.
Russell, J. S., Stouffer, B., and Walesh, S. G. (2000). “The first professional degree: A historic opportunity.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 126(2), 54–63.
13.
Walesh, S. G. (2000). “Engineer our future or others will engineer it for us.”J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 16(2), 35–41.
14.
Wankat, P. C., and Oreovicz, F. S. ( 1993). Teaching engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 〈http://che.www.ecn.purdue.edu/che/news/book/〉.
15.
Wilson, E. O. ( 1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge, Vantage Books, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Nov 14, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.