Tensile Reinforcement Effects on Bridge‐Approach Settlement
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 4
Abstract
It had been reported, through observation of actual field installations, that the inclusion of tensile reinforcement in the approach fill behind bridge abutments can effectively reduce approach fill settlement, and hence reduce the “bump” that may otherwise be experienced at both ends of the bridge. This study was undertaken to investigate, by the finite element method, the effectiveness of placing both tensile‐reinforcement sheets in the approach fill, and a “collapsible” inclusion between the reinforced fill and abutment in reducing bridge‐approach settlement. Confidence in the finite element analysis procedure was gained by comparing analytical results with the measured response of two controlled full‐scale bridge‐approach settlement tests; one with a geogrid reinforcement and the other without any reinforcement. Two parametric studies were then conducted. The first study examined the mechanism of tensile reinforcement for alleviating bridge‐approach settlement under different backfill, foundation, and reinforcement conditions. The second study examined the effectiveness of using both tensile reinforcement and a collapsible inclusion to reduce approach‐fill settlement, under different reinforcement stiffnesses and surcharge pressures. The results of the two studies are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Collin, J. G. (1986). “Earth wall design,” PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
2.
Duncan, J. M., and Chang, C. Y. (1970). “Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 96(5), 1629–1654.
3.
Edgar, T. V., Puckett, J. A., and D'Spain, R. B. (1989). “Effects of geotextiles on lateral pressure and deformation in highway embankments.” Geotext. Geomembr., 8(4), 275–306.
4.
Horvath, J. S. (1991). “Using geosynthetics to reduce surcharge‐induced stresses on rigid earth retaining structures.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1330, 47–53.
5.
Kutara, K., Gomado, M., Takeuchi, T., and Maeda, S. (1985). “Use of geotextiles as a countermeasure for differential settlement in road embankments.” Soils Found., 33(5), 27–32 (in Japanese).
6.
Monley, G. J. (1987). “An investigation of the effectiveness of tensile reinforcement in alleviating approach fill settlement behind bridge abutment,” MS thesis, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo.
7.
Price, J. T., and Sherman, W. F. (1986). “Geotextiles eliminate approach slab settlement.” Public Works, 58–59.
8.
Seed, R. B., and Duncan, J. M. (1986). “Finite element analyses: Compaction‐induced stresses and deformations.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 103(11), 1341—1345.
9.
Wu, J. T. H., and Helwany, M. B. (1990). “Alleviating bridge approach settlement with geosynthetic reinforcement.” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, The Hague, Netherlands, 107–111.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 21, 1991
Published online: Apr 1, 1993
Published in print: Apr 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.