Cumulative Effect of Project Changes for Electrical and Mechanical Construction
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 6
Abstract
Change is inevitable on construction projects, primarily because of the uniqueness of each project and the limited resources of time and money that can be spent on planning, executing, and delivering the project. Change clauses, which authorize the owner to alter work performed by the contractor, are included in most construction contracts and provide a mechanism for equitable adjustment to the contract price and duration. Even so, owners and contractors do not always agree on the adjusted contract price or the time it will take to incorporate the change. What is needed is a method to quantify the impact that the adjustments required by the change will have on the changed and unchanged work. Owners and our legal system recognize that contractors have a right to an adjustment in contract price for owner changes, including the cost associated with materials, labor, lost profit, and increased overhead due to changes. However, the actions of a contractor can impact a project just as easily as those of an owner. A more complex issue is that of determining the cumulative impact that single or multiple change orders may have over the life of a project. This paper presents a method to quantify the cumulative impact on labor productivity for mechanical and electrical construction resulting from changes in the project. Statistical hypothesis testing and correlation analysis were made to identify factors that affect productivity loss resulting from change orders. A multiple regression model was developed to estimate the cumulative impact of change orders. The model includes six significant factors, namely: Percent change, change order processing time, overmanning, percentage of time the project manager spent on the project, percentage of the changes initiated by the owner, and whether the contractor tracks productivity or not. Sensitivity analysis was performed on the model to study the impact of one factor on the productivity loss (%delta). The model can be used proactively to determine the impacts that management decisions will have on the overall project productivity. They may also be used at the conclusion of the project as a dispute resolution tool. It should be noted that every project is unique, so these tools need to be applied with caution.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Civitello, A.M. ( 1987). Contractor’s guide to change orders, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, N.J.
2.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). ( 1990). “The impact of changes on construction cost and schedule.” Publication 6-10, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
3.
Cushman, R., and Butler, S. ( 1994). Construction change order claims, Wiley, Somerset, N.J.
4.
Hanna, A.S. ( 2001). “Quantifying the cumulative impact of change orders for electrical and mechanical contractors.” Research Rep. No. 158-11, February, Construction Industry Institute (CII), Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
5.
Hanna, A. S., Camlic, R., Peterson, P. A., Nordheim, E. V. (2002). “Quantitative definition of projects impacted by change orders.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(1) 57–64.
6.
Hanna, A. S., Russell, J. S., Nordheim, E. V., and Bruggink, M. J. (1999a). “Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for electrical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125,(4), 224–232.
7.
Hanna, A. S., Russell, J. S., Gotzion, T. W., and Nordheim., E. V. (1999b) “Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for mechanical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3)176–184.
8.
Hass Haynie Corp. ( 1984). GSBCA Nos. 5530,6224,6638.6920.84-2 B.C.A. (CCH) 17,446 at 86,897.
9.
Ibbs, C.W., and Allen, W.E. ( 1995). “Quantitative impacts of project change.” Source Document, 108, M. Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
10.
Leonard, C.A. ( 1988). “The effects of change orders on productivity.” Masters thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
11.
Nordheim, E.V., and Clayton, M.K. ( 1996). “Course notes for statistics/forestry/horticulture 571.” Dept. of Statistics Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wis.
12.
Schwartzkopf, W. ( 1995). Calculating lost labor productivity in construction claims, Wiley, Somerset, N.J.
13.
Schwartzkopf, W., McNamara, J.J., and Hoffar, J.F. ( 1992). Calculating construction damage, Wiley, Somerset, N.J.
14.
Wideman, M. (1994). “A pragmatic approach to using resource loading, production, and learning curves on construction projects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 21, 939–952.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.