Tidal Bore Dynamics of a Mixed Estuary: The Hooghly River, India
Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 1
Abstract
The study establishes, with the aid of field measurements and numerical modeling, that the upper reach of the Hooghly estuary (India), though damped, registers an intense tidal bore. The lower estuary is amplified but does not show signs of bore formation. Limited quantitative studies are available on bores forming in damped estuaries. This study attempts to fill this gap using tidal gauge and velocity observations supplemented with simulation results obtained using the open-source numerical shallow-water solver TELEMAC 2D. New estimates of bore intensity in the Hooghly are presented confirming that the bore Froude number may reach 1.37 in the upper estuary for higher tidal ranges. The numerical model is used to gain further insights into the formation and evolution of the Hooghly bore. The model, despite using a vertically averaged velocity field, simulates tidal wave propagation and estimates of velocity magnitude during bore propagation with significant accuracy. The study demonstrates that the proposed model is an efficient and inexpensive tool for capturing the bore phenomenon and may be used to supplement field observations. Using the simulation results, key features of the Hooghly bore, such as the distance of the bore inception from the ocean mouth and the threshold tidal range for bore formation are investigated. The numerical simulations highlight the impact of riverbed asymmetry in bore appearances in natural estuaries. The analysis also reveals new information about bores in the Hooghly estuary, which may be useful for planning shipping and berthing operations in the port terminals along the river. A comparison with other estuaries witnessing tidal bores indicates that the Hooghly experiences a strong bore, despite the high dissipative forces owing to the rapid convergence of river width.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These include data presented in Figs. 3 and 6–10 and information related to TELEMAC 2D modeling.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- Amax
- maximum free surface gradient (–);
- c
- bore celerity (LT–1);
- c0
- classical wave celerity (LT–1);
- g
- gravitational acceleration (LT–2);
- h
- flow depth (L);
- n
- Manning roughness coefficient (L–1/3T);
- t
- time (T);
- u
- depth-averaged streamwise velocity in x-direction (LT–1);
- |U|
- velocity magnitude (LT–1);
- v
- depth-averaged streamwise velocity in y-direction (LT–1);
- X
- distance along the channel centerline (L);
- x, y
- coordinate directions (L);
- Y
- distance transverse to the channel centerline (L);
- zb
- bed elevation (L); and
- η
- free surface elevation (L).
References
Bartsch-Winkler, S., and D. K. Lynch. 1988. Catalog of worldwide tidal bore occurrences and characteristics. US Geological Survey Circular No. 1022. Washington, DC: USGS.
Bonneton, P., N. Bonneton, J.-P. Parisot, and B. Castelle. 2015. “Tidal bore dynamics in funnel-shaped estuaries.” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 120 (2): 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010267.
Bonneton, P., A. G. Filippini, L. Arpaia, N. Bonneton, and M. Ricchiuto. 2016. “Conditions for tidal bore formation in convergent alluvial estuaries.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 172: 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.01.019.
BSBD (Bengal Secretariat Book Depot). 1919. Vol. 1 of Report on the Hooghly River and its head waters. Calcutta, India: BSBD.
Chanson, H. 2010. “Unsteady turbulence in tidal bores: Effects of bed roughness.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 136 (5): 247–256. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000048.
Chanson, H. 2011. “Current knowledge in tidal bores and their environmental, ecological and cultural impacts.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 11 (1): 77–98. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10652-009-9160-5.
Chanson, H. 2012a. Tidal bores, aegir, eagre, mascaret, pororoca, theory and observations. Singapore: World Scientific.
Chanson, H. 2012b. “Momentum considerations in hydraulic jumps and bores.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138 (4): 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000409.
Chanson, H., D. Reungoat, B. Simon, and P. Lubin. 2011. “High-frequency turbulence and suspended sediment concentration measurements in the Garonne River tidal bore.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 95 (2–3): 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.09.012.
Chatterjee, A. K. 1978. “Two dimensional mathematical model of a tidal estuary.” In Proc., 47th Research Session of CBIP. Hubli Dharwar, India: CBIP.
Chatterjee, A. K., and L. Debnath. 1976. “Nonlinear mathematical model of the junction of tidal rivers.” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2 (1): 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0771-050X(76)90033-4.
Chugh, R. S. 1961. “Tides in Hooghly river.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 6 (2): 10–26.
Fernandes, E. H., K. R. Dyer, and L. F. H. Niencheski. 2001. “Calibration and validation of the TELEMAC-2D model to the Patos lagoon (Brazil).” J. Coastal Res. 470–488. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25736313.
Filippini, A. G., L. Arpaia, P. Bonneton, and M. Ricchiuto. 2019. “Modeling analysis of tidal bore formation in convergent estuaries.” Eur. J. Mech. B. Fluids 73: 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2018.01.001.
Hervouet, J. M. 2007. Hydrodynamics of free surface flows: Modeling with the finite element method. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Khezri, N., and H. Chanson. 2012. “Undular and breaking bores on fixed and movable gravel beds.” J. Hydraul. Res. 50 (4): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.686200.
Kiri, U., X. Leng, and H. Chanson. 2020. “Transient secondary currents behind a compression wave in an irregular channel.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 20 (4): 1053–1073. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10652-020-09740-y.
Kjerfve, B., and H. O. Ferreira. 1993. “Tidal bores: First ever measurements.” Ciênci. Cult. 45 (2): 135–138.
KoPT (Kolkata Port Trust). 2021. “Bore tide notice.” Accessed November 23, 2021. https://smportkolkata.shipping.gov.in/showfile.php?layout=1&lang=1&lid=4397.
Leng, X. 2018. “A study of turbulence: The unsteady propagation of bores and surges.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Queensland.
Lighthill, J. 1978. Waves in fluids. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Madsen, P. A., H. J. Simonsen, and C. H. Pan. 2005. “Numerical simulation of tidal bores and hydraulic jumps.” Coastal Eng. 52 (5): 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.12.007.
Mali, V. K., B. Veeranna, A. Parik, and S. N. Kuiry. 2020. “Experimental and numerical study of flood dynamics in a river-network-floodplain set-up.” J. Hydroinf. 22 (4): 793–814. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.160.
Mazumder, N. C., and S. Bose. 1995. “Formation and propagation of tidal bore.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 121 (3): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1995)121:3(167).
National Tidal and Sea Level Facility. 2022. “Real-time data – UK national tidal gauge network.” Accessed April 4, 2022. https://ntslf.org/data/uk-network-real-time.
Pal, R., and P. Pani. 2016. “Seasonality, barrage (Farakka) regulated hydrology and flood scenarios of the Ganga River: A study based on MNDWI and simple Gumbel model.” Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2 (2): 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0114-x.
Peregrine, D. H. 1966. “Calculations of the development of an undular bore.” J. Fluid Mech. 25 (2): 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066001678.
Reungoat, D., H. Chanson, and B. Caplain. 2012. Field measurements in the tidal bore of the Garonne River at Arcins (June 2012). Hydraulic model report no. CH89/12. Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland.
Reungoat, D., H. Chanson, and B. Caplain. 2014. “Sediment processes and flow reversal in the undular tidal bore of the Garonne River (France).” Environ. Fluid Mech. 14 (3): 591–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9319-y.
Reungoat, D., P. Lubin, X. Leng, and H. Chanson. 2018. “Tidal bore hydrodynamics and sediment processes: 2010–2016 field observations in France.” Coastal Eng. J. 60 (4): 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2018.1529265.
Rudra, K. 2018. Rivers of the Ganga-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta. A fluvial account of Bengal. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Sandover, J. A., and C. Taylor. 1962. “Cnoidal waves and bores.” La Houille Blanche 48 (3): 443–465. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/1962045.
Savenije, H. H. G., and E. J. M. Veling. 2005. “Relation between tidal damping and wave celerity in estuaries.” J. Geophys. Res. 110: C04007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002278.
Simpson, J. H., N. R. Fisher, and P. Wiles. 2004. “Reynolds stress and TKE production in an estuary with a tidal bore.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 60 (4): 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.03.006.
Sinha, P. C., P. Guliani, G. K. Jena, A. D. Rao, S. K. Dube, A. K. Chatterjee, and T. Murty. 2004. “A breadth averaged numerical model for suspended sediment transport in Hooghly estuary, East Coast of India.” Nat. Hazard. 32 (2): 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000031316.67393.23.
Van Rijn, L. C. 2011. “Analytical and numerical analysis of tides and salinities in estuaries; part I: Tidal wave propagation in convergent estuaries.” Ocean Dyn. 61 (11): 1719–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-011-0453-0.
Viero, D. P., and A. Defina. 2018. “Consideration of the mechanisms for tidal bore formation in an idealized planform geometry.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (8): 5670–5686. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022937.
Wolanski, E., D. Williams, S. Spagnola, and H. Chanson. 2004. “Undular tidal bore dynamics in the Daly Estuary, Northern Australia.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 60 (4): 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.03.001.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., and J. A. Sandover. 1957. “The undular surge wave.” In Vol. 2 of Proc. 7th IAHR Congress, D1–D11, Paper D25. Lisbon, Portugal: The International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research (IAHR).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 149 • Issue 1 • January 2023
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 24, 2022
Accepted: Aug 9, 2022
Published online: Oct 31, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.