Scour Beneath and Adjacent to Submarine Pipelines with Spoilers on a Cohesive Seabed: Case Study of Hangzhou Bay, China
Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 1
Abstract
This study focused on scour beneath and adjacent to submarine pipelines with spoilers on a cohesive seabed. Field data about the seabed bathymetry and seabed subbottom imagery along the pipeline length direction in the Hangzhou Bay, China were collected between 2005 and 2016 for analysis. Results showed that during the last 12 years, self-buried pipelines increased from 40 to 90%; while distributions of scour pits changed randomly with time. Statistical parameters (depth and length of free span) of the scour pits beneath the pipeline in this study were roughly consistent with the values published in previous studies. However, scour adjacent to pipelines was different from that beneath pipelines in that it was much larger, and the formation of it was related to the erosion of the silt loam of the seabed. Three factors (decreased sediment supply, seabed scouring, and installation of spoilers), which probably led to the scouring, were investigated. Sediment supply to the Hangzhou Bay was reduced remarkably during the last 30 years, and the decrease of sediment load in the Yangtze River was the primary cause. In the Hangzhou Bay, the seabed near deep channels was continuously eroded, and the extent of erosion near the pipelines was the largest. Spoilers on pipelines could increase the degree of local turbulence and stimulate the suspension and transportation of sediment. Under the measured spring tidal current condition, the dimensionless scour depth calculated by Goncharov’s equation was relatively large; for example, the 273.1-mm (10.75-in.) diameter pipeline as an example, it was in the range of 0.33–2.49. According to the easily erodible property of silt loam, a hypothesis about the random distribution of scour pits was presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (Grant 2017YFC0405605), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 51609146), and the National Nonprofit Research Program of Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute of China (Grants Y217011 and Y218012).
References
Chen, C., and J. Zhang. 2009. “A review on scour modeling below pipelines.” In Proc., Pipelines 2009: Infrastructures Hidden Assets, edited by J. J. Galleher and M. K. Kenny, 1019–1028. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chen, S-L., G.-A. Zhang, S.-L. Yang, and J. Z. Shi. 2006. “Temporal variations of fine suspended sediment concentration in the Changjiang River estuary and adjacent coastal waters, China.” J. Hydrol. 331 (1–2): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.013.
Chiew, Y.-M. 1991. “Prediction of maximum scour depth at submarine pipelines.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 117 (4): 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:4(452).
Chiew, Y.-M. 1992. “Effect of spoilers on scour at submarine pipelines.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 118 (9): 1311–1317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1311).
Dai, Z., and J. T. Liu. 2013. “Impacts of large dams on downstream fluvial sedimentation: An example of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) on the Changjiang (Yangtze River).” J. Hydrol. 480: 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.003.
Dai, Z.-j., J. T. Liu, H.-l. Xie, and W.-y. Shi. 2014. “Sedimentation in the outer Hangzhou Bay, China: The influence of Changjiang sediment load.” J. Coastal Res. 30 (6): 1218–1225. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00164.1.
Dey, S., and N. P. Singh. 2008. “Clear-water scour below underwater pipelines under steady flow.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (5): 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:5(588).
Garde, R. J., and S. R. S. Amraei. 2009. “Goncharov’s total load equation.” ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. 15 (1): 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2009.10514933.
Hosseini, D., H. Hakimzadeh, and R. Ghiassi. 2005. “Numerical and experimental modeling of scour around submarine pipeline due to currents.” In Proc., Pipelines 2005: Optimizing Pipeline Design, Operations, and Maintenance in Today’s Economy, edited by C. Vipulanandan and R. Ortega, 793–802. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kizilöz, B., E. Çevik, and B. Aydoğan. 2015. “Estimation of scour around submarine pipelines with Artificial Neural Network.” Appl. Ocean Res. 51 (Jun): 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.006.
Kramer, H. 1935. “Sand mixtures and sand movements in fluvial models.” Trans. ASCE 100 (1): 798–838.
Larsen, B. E., D. R. Fuhrman, and B. M. Sumer. 2016. “Simulation of wave-plus-current scour beneath submarine pipelines.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 142 (5): 4016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000338.
Li, F., and L. Cheng. 1999. “Numerical model for local scour under offshore pipelines.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 125 (4): 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:4(400).
Lucassen, R. J. 1984. “Scour underneath submarine pipelines.” Master’s thesis, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Mao, Y. 1986. The interaction between a pipeline and an erodible bed. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical Univ. of Denmark.
Sumer, B. M., and J. Fredsøe. 1990. “Scour below pipelines in waves.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 116 (3): 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1990)116:3(307).
Sumer, B. M., and J. Fredsøe. 1992. “A review of wave/current-induced scour around pipelines.” In Coastal Engineering 1992, edited by B. L. Edge, 2839–2852. New York: ASCE.
Sumer, B. M., and J. Fredsøe. 1996. “Scour around pipelines in combined waves and current.” In Vol. 5 of Proc., 15th Conf. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, edited by A. Murray and R. Bruschi, 595–602. New York: ASME.
Sumer, B. M., and J. Fredsøe. 2002. The mechanics of scour in the marine environment. Vol. 17 of Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
Vijaya Kumar, A., S. Neelamani, and S. Narasimha Rao. 2003. “Wave pressures and uplift forces on and scour around submarine pipeline in clayey soil.” Ocean Eng. 30 (2): 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(02)00022-7.
Wang, B. C., and D. Eisma. 1990. “Supply and deposition of sediment along the north bank of Hangzhou Bay, China.” Neth. J. Sea Res. 25 (3): 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90045-I.
Wu, Y., and Y.-M. Chiew. 2015. “Mechanics of pipeline scour propagation in the spanwise direction.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 141 (4): 04014045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000288.
Xu, J., G. Li, P. Dong, and J. Shi. 2010. “Bedform evolution around a submarine pipeline and its effects on wave-induced forces under regular waves.” Ocean Eng. 37 (2–3): 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.10.002.
Xu, J., J. Pu, and G. Li. 2012. “Field observations of seabed scours around a submarine pipeline on cohesive bed.” In Vol. 142 of 2012 Int. Conf., Environment Science (ICES 2012), Advances in Computational Environment Science, edited by G. Lee, 23–33. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Yang, L., B. Shi, Y. Guo, and X. Wen. 2012. “Calculation and experiment on scour depth for submarine pipeline with a spoiler.” Ocean Eng. 55: 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.07.031.
Zhang, Q., S. Draper, L. Cheng, and H. An. 2017. “Time scale of local scour around pipelines in current, waves, and combined waves and current.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (3): 04016093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001247.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 8, 2017
Accepted: Jun 11, 2018
Published online: Oct 11, 2018
Published in print: Jan 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 11, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.