Technical Papers
Aug 1, 2018

CFD Investigation of Mutual Interaction between Hull, Propellers, and Rudders for an Inland Container Ship in Deep, Very Deep, Shallow, and Very Shallow Waters

Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 6

Abstract

A ship is generally characterized by three principal elements: the propulsive system, the steering system, and the hull geometry. The interaction between these elements is very strong; therefore, it is essential to be able to estimate the effect of this interaction for better control and prediction of the ship’s trajectory. This interaction is mostly affected by the drift angle, rudder angle, propeller rotation rate, and form of the stern hull. However, for ships navigating on inland waterways, the ratio, h/T, of the water depth, h, to the ship’s draught, T, can significantly affect this interaction. In this paper, we present the results of a full numerical study about the impact of the navigation environment (deep and shallow waters) on the hull–propeller–rudder interaction. A scaled inland container ship with twin propellers and quadruple rudders was selected to carry out this work. A steady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code based on Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations was validated and used to simulate the flow around the hull, propellers, and rudders. The flow was considered with a free surface and full turbulence. The influence of the confined environment on the force interaction was investigated by simulating various operating configurations of a ship; therefore, several values of the ship’s underkeel clearance, rudder angles, and propeller thrust loading were tested. The results of this work clearly show the influence of each parameter tested and confirm that the hull–propeller–rudder interaction is strongly impacted by waterway confinement.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Badoe, C. E., A. B. Phillips, and S. R. Turnock. 2015. “Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull-propeller-rudder interaction.” Ocean Eng. 103: 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059.
Baumgarten, B. 1985. Der Einfluss der Propellerbelastung auf die Ruderkräfte [The influence of the propeller load on the rudder forces]. Cologne, Germany: Experimental Office for Inland Shipbuilding, Institute at the Rheinisch-Westfalische Technischen, Univ. of Aachen.
Carlton, J. S. 2012. Marine propellers and propulsion. Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
El-Moctar, O. 1999. “Numerical investigation of propeller-rudder interaction.” In Proc., 2nd Numerical Towing Tank Symp., 38–41. Landerneau, France: Volker Bertram.
El-Moctar, O. A. M. 2001. “Numerische berechnung von strömungskräften beim manövrieren von schiffen [Numerical calculation of fluid forces during ships maneuvering].” Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Construction and Strength of Ships, Technical Univ. Hamburg.
English, J. 1979. “Cavitation induced hull surface pressures—Measurements in water tunnels.” In RINA Symp., Propeller Induced Ship Vibration. London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects.
Ghassemi, H., and P. Ghadimi. 2008. “Computational hydrodynamic analysis of the propeller–rudder and the AZIPOD systems.” Ocean Eng. 35 (1): 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.07.008.
ITTC (International Towing Tank Conference). 2017. Recommended procedures and guidelines. Verification and validation of linear and weakly nonlinear seakeeping computer codes. Lyngby, Denmark: ITTC.
Inui, T., and H. Miyata. 1979. “On the optimization of the overall performance of rudders.” J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Japan 1979 (145): 18–25. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1979.18.
Jialun, L., and H. Robert. 2016. “Sixty years of research on ship rudders: effects of design choices on rudder performance.” Ships Offshore Struct. 12 (4): 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2016.1178205.
Kaidi, S., H. Smaoui, and P. Sergent. 2017. “Numerical estimation of bank-propeller-hull interaction effect on ship manoeuvring using CFD method.” J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B 29 (1): 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60727-8.
Kang, D., V. Nagarajan, K. Hasegawa, and M. Sano. 2008. “Mathematical model of single-propeller twin-rudder ship.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 13 (3): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-008-0027-0.
Kracht, A. M. 1992. “Ship-propeller-rudder interaction.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp., Propellers and Cavitation, 181–190. Hangzhou, China: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
Li, D.-Q. 1996. “A non-linear method for the propeller-rudder interaction with the slipstream deformation taken into account.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 130 (Mar): 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(96)80458-0.
Linde, F., A. Ouahsine, N. Huybrechts, and P. Sergent. 2017. “Three-dimensional numerical simulation of ship resistance in restricted waterways: Effect of ship sinkage and channel restriction.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 143 (1): 06016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000353.
Mach, K. P. 2011. “Potsdam propeller test case (PPTC).” LDV velocity measurements with the model propeller VP1304, SVA Potsdam Model Basin. Report 3754, SVA Potsdam.
Menter, F. R. 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J. 32 (8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
Molland, A. F., and S. R. Turnock. 1991. Wind tunnel investigation of the propeller loading on ship rudder performance. Ship Science Rep. 46. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.
Molland, A. F., and S. R. Turnock. 1996. “A compact computational method for predicting forces on a rudder in a propeller slipstream.” Trans. RINA 138: 227–244.
Skaar, K. T., and A. E. Raestad. 1979. “The relative importance of ship vibration excitation forces.” In Proc., RINA Symp., Propeller Induced Ship Vibration. London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects.
Söding, H. 1999. “Limits of potential theory in rudder flow predictions.” In Proc., 22nd Symp. Naval Hydrodynamics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Szantyr, J. A. 2007. “Mutual hydrodynamic interaction between the operating propeller and the rudder.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 7 (3): 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60026-0.
Tezdogan, T., A. Incecik, and O. Turan. 2016. “A numerical investigation of the squat and resistance of ships advancing through a canal using CFD.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 21 (1): 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-015-0334-1.
Turnock, S. 1999. “Interpretation of CFD results for use in ship hydrodynamic design.” In Proc. 2nd Int. CFD Conference. Philadelphia: IOP Publishing.
van Wijngaarden, E. 2005. “Recent developments in predicting propeller-induced hull pressure pulses.” In Proc., 1st Int. Ship Noise and Vibration Conf. London: Maritime Research Institute Netherlands.
Vantorre, M., K. Eloot, and B. Heylbroeck. 1995. “Evaluation of the mathematical models for propulsion and rudder forces by the captive model tests with bulkcarriers in shallow water.” In Proc., Int. Symposium on Manoeuvrability of Ships at Slow Speed, 39–54. Ilawa, Poland.
Yamazaki, R. 1968. “On the propulsion theory of ships on still water—Introduction.” Mem. Faculty Eng. Kyushu Univ. 27 (4): 187–220.
Yumuro, A. 1974. “An experimental studies on incoming flow direction to the rudder of a ship sailing obliquely on rudder performance.” IHI Eng. Rev. 3 (4).
Yumuro, A. 1978. “An experimental study on inflow direction and inflow velocity to the rudder of a ship in manoeuvring motion.” In Proc., 7th Scientific and Methodological Seminar Ship Hydrodynamics: Ship Manoeuvring and Handling, Bulgaria.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 144Issue 6November 2018

History

Received: Feb 2, 2017
Accepted: Feb 6, 2018
Published online: Aug 1, 2018
Published in print: Nov 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 1, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Researcher, Cerema Direction Technique Eau, Mer et Fleuves, 134 rue de Beauvais, CS 60039–60280, Margny Lès Compiègne, France; CNRS, UMR 7337, Roberval Centre de recherche Royallieu, Sorbonne Univ., Univ. de Technologie de Compiègne, CS 60319–60203 Compiègne Cedex, France (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Researcher Director, Cerema Direction Technique Eau, Mer et Fleuves, 134 rue de Beauvais, CS 60039–60280, Margny Lès Compiègne, France; CNRS, UMR 7337, Roberval Centre de recherche Royallieu, Sorbonne Univ. Univ. de Technologie de Compiègne, CS 60319–60203, Compiègne Cedex, France. Email: [email protected]
Scientific Director, Cerema Direction Technique Eau, Mer et Fleuves, 134 rue de Beauvais, Margny Lès Compiègne, CS 60039-60280, France. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share