Technical Papers
Dec 26, 2022

A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149, Issue 3

Abstract

From the Rocky Mountains in the US to the Sea of Cortez in Mexico, the Colorado River is one of the most managed and monitored rivers in the world. As decreasing river flows from drought and climate change continue to impact the Colorado River Basin, the US federal government, seven US states, and Mexico have signed agreements that would reduce deliveries, including a Drought Contingency Plan (DCP), an agreement among the US states and the Bureau of Reclamation, and Minute 323 (a treaty agreement between the US and Mexico). As part of the DCP, the US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) committed to increasing conservation efforts to augment storage in Lake Mead. This paper presents an analysis of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports that record water deliveries and conservation savings from 1964 to 2019. Overall, this analysis illustrates that (1) the agency has implemented significant conservation actions over the last three decades, (2) the agency has responded to increased accounting needs as dictated by national and international management agreements, (3) some actions have resulted in environmental costs, and (4) future actions could be designed to avoid environmental harms while also augmenting Lake Mead levels. As climate change continues to constrain Colorado River water supply, detailed accounting may help reveal areas for potential efficiencies or demonstrate where the greatest levels of savings have been reached while ensuring that environmental and social benefits are preserved.

Practical Applications

Over the last 100 years, humans have changed the path and personality of the Colorado River by distributing water to cities, communities, and agricultural fields to support over 40 million people. Throughout the twentieth century, the US federal government, seven US, and Mexico signed agreements enabling development of Colorado River water. By the early 21st century, as it became evident that water demands and climate change were reducing available supplies, these same governments signed agreements to reduce pressure on the river. All these agreements have, in part, been tracked by the US federal agency that manages the river, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), through Decree Accounting Reports. Since 1964, these reports have recorded how water is or is not accounted for that might be important to the future of the river. This paper examines those reports and reveals four main findings: (1) Reclamation has implemented numerous water conservation projects, (2) they have responded to new management agreements, (3) some of their actions have impacted the environment, and (4) there are proactive ways they can reduce environmental impacts and bolster water supplies in the future.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Non-PDF data, scripts and analysis are archived on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5048281). PDFs of Decree Accounting Reports are required for replication and can be downloaded at https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/wtracct.html.

References

116th Congress. 2019. Vol. 133 of Colorado river basin drought contingency plans. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office.
Arizona Department of Water Resources and Bureau of Reclamation. 2016. “Recommendations of the bypass flows workgroup.” Accessed October 3, 2022. https://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/States/ContingencyPlanning/AZ/WorkgroupFinalReportFinal.pdf.
Baeza, K. 2013. “Salinity limits of vegetation in Cienega de Santa Clara, an oligotrophic marsh in the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico: Implications for an increase in salinity.” Ecol. Eng. 59 (Oct): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.08.019.
Bureau of Reclamation. 1984. 13th annual report: Operation of the Colorado River Basin 1983, Projected operations 1984. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2003. Inadvertent overrun and payback policy in the record of decision for the Colorado River water delivery agreement. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2004. Lower Colorado river accounting system: Demonstration of technology. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2006. Summary description of accounting for water use in the Yuma area beginning with calendar year 2003. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2007. Record of decision: Colorado river interim guidelines for lower basin shortages and the coordinated operations for lake powell and lake mead. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2010. Lower Colorado region policy for apportioned but unused water. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2012. Colorado river basin water supply and demand study: Study report. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2015. Colorado river basin stakeholders moving forward to address challenges identified in the Colorado river basin water supply and demand study: Phase 1 report: Executive summary. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2018. “U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Lower Colorado River Region.” US Government. Accessed January 23, 2018. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2019. “Pilot system conservation program.” US Government. Accessed September 11, 2019. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/PilotSysConsProg/pilotsystem.html.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2020. Review of the Colorado River interim guidelines for lower basin shortages and coordinated operations for Lake Powell and lake mead. Upper and lower Colorado basin regions. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2022a. “Bureau of reclamation: Boulder Canyon Operations Office—Lower Colorado river water accounting.” Accessed May 13, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/wtracct.html.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2022b. “Lower Colorado region: Boulder Canyon Operations Office—Programs and activities.” Bureau of Reclamation. Accessed May 13, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/wtracct.html.
Calleros, J. R. 1991. “The impact on Mexico of the lining of the All-American canal.” Nat. Resour. J. 31: 11.
CAWCD (Central Arizona Water Conservation District). 2005. “Balancing water needs on the lower Colorado river: Recommendations of the Yuma desalting plant/Cienega de Santa Clara Workgroup.” Yuma Desalting Plant and Cienega de Santa Clara Workgroup. Accessed September 21, 2019. https://www.cap-az.com/documents/public-information/Balancing-water-needs.pdf.
Cohen, M. J., C. Henges-Jeck, and G. Castillo-Moreno. 2001. “A preliminary water balance for the Colorado River Delta, 1992–1998.” J. Arid. Environ. 49 (1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2001.0834.
Colorado River Governance Initiative. 2013. Cross-boundary water transfers in the Colorado River Basin: A review of efforts and issues associated with marketing water across state lines or reservation boundaries, 67. Boulder, CO: Univ. of Colorado Law School.
Cook, B. I., T. R. Ault, and J. E. Smerdon. 2015. “Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American southwest and central plains.” Sci. Adv. 1 (1): e1400082. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400082.
Cook, B. I., J. S. Mankin, and K. J. Anchukaitis. 2018. “Climate change and drought: From past to future.” Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 4 (2): 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0093-2.
Cook, B. I., R. Seager, A. Park Williams, M. J. Puma, S. McDermid, M. Kelley, and L. Nazarenko. 2019. “Climate change amplification of natural drought variability: The historic mid-twentieth-century North American drought in a warmer world.” J. Clim. 32 (17): 5417–5436. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0832.1.
Cook, E. R. 2004. “Long-term aridity changes in the western United States.” Science 306 (5698): 1015–1018. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102586.
Corez-Lara, A., and M.-R. García-Acevedo. 2000. “The lining of the All-American Canal: The forgotten voices.” Nat. Resour. J. 40 (2): 261–279.
Defenders of Wildlife v. Babbitt. 2003. “Civil action no. 00-1544 (JR).” Accessed March 31, 2003. https://casetext.com/case/defenders-of-wildlife-v-babbitt-3.
Department of the Interior. 2001. Record of decision: Colorado river interim surplus guidelines final environmental impact statement. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
Fleck, J. 2022. “John Fleck github data repository.” Accessed May 1, 2022. https://github.com/johnrfleck.
Fradkin, P. L. 1981. A river no more: The Colorado River and the West. Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona Press.
Glenn, E. P., K. W. Flessa, and J. Pitt. 2013. “Restoration potential of the aquatic ecosystems of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico: Introduction to special issue on ‘Wetlands of the Colorado River Delta.’” Ecol. Eng. 59 (Oct): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.057.
Glenn, E. P., P. L. Nagler, R. Romo, and O. Hinojosa-Huerta. 2004. “Regeneration of native trees and wetlands in the Delta.” Southwest Hydrol. 3 (1): 12–13.
Hinojosa-Huerta, O., P. L. Nagler, Y. Carrillo-Guerrero, J. Garcia, F. Zamora-Arroyo, K. Gillon, and E. P. Glenn. 2002. “Andrade mesa wetlands of the All-American Canal.” Nat. Resour. J. 42 (4): 899–914.
IBWC (International Boundary and Water Commission). 1973. Minute 242: Permanent and definitive solution to the international problem of the salinity of the Colorado River. El Paso, TX: IBWC.
IBWC (International Boundary and Water Commission). 2010. Minute 316: Utilization of the Wellton-Mohawk bypass drain and necessary infrastructure in the United States for the conveyance of water by Mexico and non-governmental organizations of both countries to the Santa Clara wetland during the Yuma desalting plant pilot run. El Paso, TX: IBWC.
IBWC (International Boundary and Water Commission). 2012. Minute No. 319: Interim international cooperative measures in the Colorado river basin through 2017 and extension of Minute 318 cooperative measures to address the continued effects of the April 2010 earthquake in the Mexicali valley, Baja California. El Paso, TX: IBWC.
IBWC (International Boundary and Water Commission). 2016a. Minute 319: Colorado river limitrophe and delta environmental flows monitoring—Interim report. El Paso, TX: IBWC.
IBWC (International Boundary and Water Commission). 2016b. A report on Colorado river salinity operations under international boundary and water commission Minute No. 242: January 1 to December 31, 2013. El Paso, TX: IBWC.
IBWC (International Boundary and Water Commission). 2017. Minute No. 323: Extension of cooperative measures and adoption of a binational water scarcity contingency plan in the Colorado River Basin. El Paso, TX: IBWC.
Imperial Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and Coachella Valley Water District. 2003. Quantification settlement agreement. Sacramento, CA: Water Education Foundation.
Jenkins, M. 2007. “The efficiency paradox.” High Country News, February 5, 2007. https://www.hcn.org/issues/339/16808.
Kennedy, J., J. Eliana Rodríguez-Burgueño, and J. Ramírez-Hernández. 2017. “Groundwater response to the 2014 pulse flow in the Colorado River Delta.” Ecol. Eng. 106 (Sep): 715–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.072.
Lesser, L. E., J. Mahlknecht, and M. López-Pérez. 2019. “Long-term hydrodynamic effects of the All-American Canal lining in an arid transboundary multilayer aquifer: Mexicali valley in north-western Mexico.” Environ. Earth Sci. 78 (16): 504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8487-6.
Luecke, D. F., J. Pitt, C. Congdon, E. P. Glenn, C. Valdés-Casillas, M. Briggs, and Environmental Defense Fund. 1999. A delta once more: Restoring riparian and wetland habitat in the Colorado River Delta. Washington, DC: Environmental Defense Fund.
Milly, P. C. D., and K. A. Dunne. 2020. “Colorado river flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation.” Science 367 (6483): 1252–1255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187.
Milly, P. C. D., K. A. Dunne, and A. V. Vecchia. 2005. “Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate.” Nature 438 (7066): 347–350. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04312.
Pitt, J., C. W. Fitzer, and L. Force. 2002. “New water for the Colorado River: Economic and environmental considerations for replacing the bypass flow.” U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 6: 68.
Ramírez-Hernández, J., O. Hinojosa-Huerta, M. Peregrina-Llanes, A. Calvo-Fonseca, and E. Carrera-Villa. 2013. “Groundwater responses to controlled water releases in the Limitrophe region of the Colorado River: Implications for management and restoration.” Ecol. Eng. 59 (Oct): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.016.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community. 1988. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian community water rights settlement agreement of 1988. Albuquerque, NM: Univ. of New Mexico.
Sanchez, R., V. Lopez, and G. Eckstein. 2016. “Identifying and characterizing transboundary aquifers along the Mexico–US Border: An initial assessment.” J. Hydrol. 535 (Apr): 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.070.
Sánchez Munguía, V., ed. 2006. The U.S.-Mexican border environment: Lining the All-American Canal: Competition or cooperation for the water in the U.S.-Mexican Border. San Diego: San Diego State University Press.
Secretary of the Interior, Arizona Water Banking Authority, Southern Nevada Water Authority, and Colorado River Commission of Nevada. 2002. “Storage and interstate release agreement.” Accessed September 10, 2019. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/contracts/SIRAfinal.pdf.
Supreme Court of the United States. 1964. State of Arizona v. State of California. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
Ten Tribes Partnership. 2018. Colorado river basin Ten Tribes Partnership tribal water study. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
Tillman, F. D., A. L. Coes, D. W. Anning, J. P. Mason, and T. B. Coplen. 2019. “Investigation of recent decadal-scale cyclical fluctuations in salinity in the lower Colorado river.” J. Environ. Manage. 235 (Apr): 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.072.
Udall, B., and J. Overpeck. 2017. “The twenty-first century Colorado river hot drought and implications for the future.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (3): 2404–2418. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019638.
US Congress. 1921. Colorado river compact 1922. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office.
US Congress. 1928. Boulder canyon project act. 70th congress. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office.
US Congress. 1974. Vol. 1571 of Colorado river basin salinity control act. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office.
US Department of State. 1944. Utilization of waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande: Treaty between the United States of America and Mexico. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office.
US Department of the Interior. 1964. Compilation of records in accordance with article V(B) of the decree of the supreme court of the United States in Arizona v. California: Calendar year 1964. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
US Department of the Interior. 1965. Compilation of records in accordance with article V(B) of the decree of the supreme court of the United States in Arizona v. California: Calendar year 1965. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
US Department of the Interior. 1966. Compilation of records in accordance with article V(B) of the decree of the supreme court of the United States in Arizona v. California: Calendar year 1966. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
US Department of the Interior. 1970. Compilation of records in accordance with article V(B) of the decree of the supreme court of the United States in Arizona v. California: Calendar year 1970. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
US Department of the Interior. 1974. Compilation of records in accordance with article V of the decree of the supreme court of the United States in Arizona v. California: Calendar year 1973. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
US Department of the Interior. 1994. Compilation of records in accordance with article V(B) of the decree of the supreme court of the United States in Arizona v. California: Calendar year 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
US Department of the Interior. 2004. Compilation of records in accordance with article V(B) of the decree of the supreme court of the United States in Arizona v. California: Calendar year 2004. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
Wilson, K. 2021. “Zenodo: Martin-McCoy/Decree_accounting_analysis.” Accessed June 30, 2021. https://zenodo.org/record/5048281#.Y0mm2OzMLUI.
Zamora-Arroyo, F., O. Hinojosa-Huerte, E. Santiago, E. Brott, and P. Culp. 2008. “Collaboration in Mexico: Renewed hope for the Colorado River Delta.” Nevada Law J. 8 (3): 7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Aug 7, 2021
Accepted: Jul 31, 2022
Published online: Dec 26, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 26, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Director, AMP Insights, P.O. Box 1461, Bend, OR 97709 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-1909. Email: [email protected]
Director, National Audubon Society, 225 Varick St., Seventh Floor, New York, NY 10014. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-9556
J. Keaton Wilson, Ph.D.
Senior Data Scientist, Virga Labs, 11201 Tatum Blvd. Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ 85028.
Season Martin
Director, Virga Labs, 11201 Tatum Blvd. Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ 85028.
Julia Morton
Manager, National Audubon Society, 225 Varick St., Seventh Floor, New York, NY 10014.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share