Technical Papers
Sep 27, 2022

Analysis of Sewer Network Performance in the Context of Modernization: Modeling, Sensitivity, and Uncertainty Analysis

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 12

Abstract

Specific flood volume and degree of flooding are important parameters for evaluating the performance of stormwater networks. Hydrodynamic models are usually used to calculate these important measures, but this task requires the collection of detailed data on land use, the sewer network, rainfall, and flows, which are not always possible to obtain. The present research consists in the development of a methodology, using the USEPA Stormwater Management Model (SWMM), for simulating the performance of a stormwater network to determine whether it is in need of modernization. This determination is based on independent variables including rainfall data, catchment retention, and channel capacity. A logistic regression was developed to assess the sewer network performance based on simulation of specific flood volume and degree of flooding in the context of modernization. An extended sensitivity analysis was also used to assess the influence of rainfall intensity on the results of sensitivity coefficient calculations for the calibrated SWMM parameters. Using the extreme gradient boosting method, a tool has been developed to optimize the combination of SWMM parameters, reducing the uncertainty of simulation results, which can be used in the selection of their measurement methods prior to model development. It has been shown that, using the logistic regression model, it is possible to rapidly simulate the operation of a stormwater system to assess its need for modernization. It was confirmed that an increase in rainfall intensity leads to a significant decrease in the values of the calculated sensitivity coefficients associated with the SWMM parameters. The highest sensitivity coefficient was shown for a correction coefficient for percentage of impervious areas; for rainfall intensity 33133  L·(s·ha)1 varied from 1.45 to 12.38. This result leads to a method for selecting specific rainfall events for calibration of the model, thereby improving the ability to assess the performance of the stormwater system. Interestingly, however, for the exemplary catchment in Kielce, Poland, the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method was used, combined with the XGboost machine learning technique, to determine that the reliability of the SWMM parameters has a negligible impact on the probability of a stormwater network failure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. SWMM model code, and calculations of the likelihood function depending on SWMM parameters are the property of the corresponding author.

References

Barbosa, A. E., J. N. Fernandes, and L. M. David. 2012. “Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management.” Water Res. 46 (20): 6787–6798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.029.
Beger, A. 2016. “Precision-recall curves.” Accessed April 15, 2016. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2765419.
Beven, K., and A. Binley. 1992. “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes 6 (3): 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
Biecek, P. 2018. “DALEX: Explainers for complex predictive models in R.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 19 (1): 3245–3249.
Bogdanowicz, E., and J. Stachy. 1998. “Maximum rainfall in Poland—Design characteristics.” [In Polish.] Res. Mater. 23: 98.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2017. Drain and sewer systems outside buildings—Sewer system management. BS EN 752:2017. London: BSI.
Chen, T., and C. Guestrin. 2016. “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system.” In Proc., ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785.
De Risi, R., F. De Paola, J. Turpie, and T. Kroeger. 2018. “Life cycle cost and return on investment as complementary decision variables for urban flood risk management in developing countries.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 28 (Jun): 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.026.
Di Matteo, M., G. C. Dandy, and H. R. Maier. 2017. “Multiobjective optimization of distributed stormwater harvesting systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 143 (6): 04017010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000756.
Dotto, C. B. S., G. Mannina, M. Kleidorfer, L. Vezzaro, M. Henrichs, D. T. McCarthy, G. Freni, W. Rauch, and A. Deletic. 2012. “Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.” Water Res. 46 (8): 2545–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.009.
DWA (German Association for Water, Wastewater and Waste). 2006. Hydraulic dimensioning and verification of drain and sewer systems. DWA-A118E. Hennef, Germany: DWA.
Fatone, F., B. Szeląg, A. Kiczko, D. Majerek, M. Majewska, J. Drewnowski, and G. Łagód. 2021. “Advanced sensitivity analysis of the impact of the temporal distribution and intensity in a rainfall event on hydrograph parameters in urban catchments: A case study.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2021 (Apr): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-99.
Fletcher, T. D., H. Andrieu, and P. Hamel. 2013. “Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art.” Adv. Water Resour. 51 (Jan): 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001.
Fraga, I., L. Cea, J. Puertas, J. Suárez, V. Jiménez, and A. Jácome. 2016. “Global sensitivity and GLUE-based uncertainty analysis of a 2D-1D dual urban drainage model.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 21 (5): 04016004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001335.
Fu, G., and D. Butler. 2014. “Copula-based frequency analysis of overflow and flooding in urban drainage systems.” J. Hydrol. 510 (Mar): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.006.
Fu, G., D. Butler, S. T. Khu, and S. Sun. 2011. “Imprecise probabilistic evaluation of sewer flooding in urban drainage systems using random set theory.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008944.
Jato-Espino, D., N. Sillanpää, I. Andrés-Doménech, and J. Rodriguez-Hernandez. 2018. “Flood risk assessment in urban catchments using multiple regression analysis.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (2): 04017085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000874.
Kiczko, A., B. Szeląg, A. P. Kozioł, M. Krukowski, E. Kubrak, J. Kubrak, and R. J. Romanowicz. 2018. “Optimal capacity of a stormwater reservoir for flood peak reduction.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (4): 04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001636.
Li, X., and P. Willems. 2020. “A hybrid model for fast and probabilistic urban pluvial flood prediction.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (6): e2019WR025128. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025128.
Löwe, R., L. Vezzaro, P. S. Mikkelsen, M. Grum, and H. Madsen. 2016. “Probabilistic runoff volume forecasting in risk-based optimization for RTC of urban drainage systems.” Environ. Modell. Software 80 (Jun): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.027.
Mobley, W., A. Sebastian, R. Blessing, W. E. Highfield, L. Stearns, and S. D. Brody. 2021. “Quantification of continuous flood hazard using random forest classification and flood insurance claims at large spatial scales: A pilot study in southeast Texas.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (2): 807–822. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-807-2021.
Notaro, V., C. M. Fontanazza, G. La Loggia, and G. Freni. 2018. “Flood frequency analysis for an urban watershed: Comparison between several statistical methodologies simulating synthetic rainfall events.” J. Flood Risk Manage. 11 (Feb): S559–S574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12283.
O’Connell, M., C. B. Hurley, and K. Domijan. 2017. “Conditional visualization for statistical models: An introduction to the condvis package in R.” J. Stat. Software 81 (5): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v081.i05.
Petersen, B., K. Gernaey, M. Henze, and P. A. Vanrolleghem. 2002. “Evaluation of an ASM1 model calibration procedure on a municipal—industrial wastewater treatment plant.” J. Hydroinform. 4 (1): 15–38. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2002.0003.
Razavi, S., and H. V. Gupta. 2015. “What do we mean by sensitivity analysis? The need for comprehensive characterization of ‘global’ sensitivity in Earth and Environmental systems models.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (5): 3070–3092. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016527.
Romanowicz, R. J., and K. J. Beven. 2006. “Comments on generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 (10–11): 1315–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.030.
Rossman, L. A. 2010. Storm water management model user’s manual version 5.0 1–295. Cincinnati, OH: Water Supply and Water Resources Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory.
Sañudo, E., L. Cea, and L. Puertas. 2020. “Modelling pluvial flooding in urban areas coupling the models IBER and SWMM.” Water 12 (9): 2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092647.
Sheather, S. 2009. A modern approach to regression with R, Springer texts in statistics. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09608-7.
Siekmann, M., and J. Pinnekamp. 2011. “Indicator based strategy to adapt urban drainage systems in regard to the consequences caused by climate change.” In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Urban Drainage. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Urban Water Research Group, Dept. of the Built Environment, Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Aalborg Universitet.
Song, X., J. Zhang, C. Zhan, Y. Xuan, M. Ye, and C. Xu. 2015. “Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications.” J. Hydrol. 523 (Apr): 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.013.
Szeląg, B., A. Kiczko, G. Łagód, and F. De Paola. 2021. “Relationship between rainfall duration and sewer system performance measures within the context of uncertainty.” Water Res. Manage. 35 (15): 5073–5087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02998-x.
Thorndahl, S. 2009. “Stochastic long term modelling of a drainage system with estimation of return period uncertainty.” Water Sci. Technol. 59 (12): 2331–2339. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.305.
Thorndahl, S., and P. Willems. 2008. “Probabilistic modelling of overflow, surcharge and flooding in urban drainage using the first-order reliability method and parameterization of local rain series.” Water Res. 42 (1–2): 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.038.
Wang, Y., A. S. Chen, G. Fu, S. Djordjević, C. Zhang, and D. A. Savić. 2018. “An integrated framework for high-resolution urban flood modelling considering multiple information sources and urban features.” Environ. Modell. Software 107 (Sep): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.010.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 12December 2022

History

Received: Jan 14, 2022
Accepted: Jun 28, 2022
Published online: Sep 27, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 27, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bartosz Szeląg, Ph.D., D.Sc. [email protected]
Dept. of Geotechnics and Water Engineering, Kielce Univ. of Technology, Kielce 25-314, Poland (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Dariusz Majerek, Ph.D.
Dept. of Applied Mathematics, Lublin Univ. of Technology, Lublin 20-618, Poland.
Adam Kiczko, Ph.D., D.Sc. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-2413
Dept. of Hydraulic and Sanitary Engineering, Warsaw Univ. of Life Sciences, Warsaw 02-797, Poland. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-2413
Grzegorz Łagód, Ph.D., D.Sc.
Dept. of Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal, Lublin Univ. of Technology, Lublin 20-618, Poland.
Francesco Fatone, Ph.D., D.Sc. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Science and Engineering of Materials, Environment, and Urban Planning, Polytechnic Univ. of Marche Ancona, Ancona 60121, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Engineering, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave., Swarthmore, PA 19081. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-5088

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Impact Coefficient Evaluation for Sensor Location in Sewer Systems, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6093, 149, 11, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share