Technical Papers
Apr 20, 2022

Distributional Implications of Supply Constraints in Water Markets

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 7

Abstract

In California, after three decades of water market development, volume of water traded in the market remains lower than desired. Total volume of water traded annually accounts for just around 2%–5% of total water used. Vast difference in the marginal values of water in agriculture and urban or environmental uses suggest that significant economic gains can be achieved by easing the barriers to trading water across sectors. This paper draws attention to the role of state and local policies in restricting water transfers. Using novel, purpose-built, satellite-mapped data of a sample of water-trading irrigation districts in California, this paper shows how districts’ water transfer decisions are made in response to conflicting pressures of drought-induced high-water demand against the need to support the agricultural economy and the environment in water-exporting areas. The time period under study is 1991–2019, which spans the entire history of water market activity in California from inception to maturity, and helps illustrate the role of changing local and state policies on irrigation districts’ water market participation. Despite policy-induced restrictions, this paper shows that sample irrigation districts are highly responsive to demand in water-buying areas, have increased the volume and frequency of water transfers, particularly in the last decade. This paper highlights important research and policy questions about the distribution of economic and environmental effects of water transfers in source area communities that could affect the future potential of water markets in easing structural and drought-induced water scarcity in California.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Alyssa Caldwell for providing excellent research assistance. Conversations with staff of the Department of Water Resources and managers of the sample irrigation districts, particularly Ted Trimble, were immensely helpful. Also, comments and suggestions from participants of the Ostrom Workshop Colloquium, associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers helped to improve the manuscript and are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Bigelow, D. P., A. M. Chaudhry, J. Ifft, and S. Wallander. 2019. “Agricultural water trading restrictions and drought resilience.” Land Econ. 95 (4): 473–493. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.95.4.473.
Bourgeon, J. M., K. W. Easter, and R. B. Smith. 2008. “Water markets and third-party effects.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 90 (4): 902–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01146.x.
Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
CDWR and BOR (California Department of Water Resources, and Bureau of Reclamation). 2019. “Information for parties preparing proposals for water transfers requiring Department of Water Resources or Bureau of Reclamation approval.” Accessed January 1, 2020. https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web-Pages/Programs/State-Water-Project/Management/Water-Transfers/Files/Draft_WTWhitePaper_20191203.pdf.
CDWR (California Data Exchange Center). 2020. “Water year hydrologic classification indices.” Accessed March 13, 2014. https://cdec.water.ca.gov/reportapp/javareports?name=WSIHIST.
Chong, H., and D. Sunding. 2006. “Water markets and trading.” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31 (Nov): 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100323.
Colby, B. G. 1990. “Transactions costs and efficiency in western water allocation.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 72 (5): 1184–1192. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242530.
Culp, P. W., R. J. Glennon, and G. Libecap. 2014. Shopping for water: How the market can mitigate water shortages in the American West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Fairbanks, D. H. K. 2011. California cultural landscapes: An exploration over space and time. 2nd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publishers.
Grafton, R. Q., et al. 2018. “The paradox of irrigation efficiency.” Science 361 (6404): 748–750. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9314.
Gray, B., E. Hanak, J. Lund, A. Dine, R. Howitt, J. Mount, P. Moyle, and B. Thompson. 2010. “Myths of California water—Implications and reality.” Hastings West Northwest J. Environ. Law Policy 16 (1): 3–74.
Gray, B. E. 1989. “A primer on California water transfer law.” Arizona Law Rev. 31: 745.
Griffin, R. C. 2012. “Engaging irrigation organizations in water reallocation.” Nat. Resour. J. 52 (2): 277–313.
Griffin, R. C. 2016. “Water marketing.” Chap. 8 in Water resource economics: The analysis of scarcity, policies, and projects, 255–297. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hanak, E. 2003. Who should be allowed to sell water in California? Third-party issues and the water market. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Hanak, E. 2015. “A California postcard: Lessons for a maturing water market.” In Routledge handbook of water economics and institutions, edited by K. Burnett, R. Howitt, J. A. Roumasset, and C. A. Wada, 253–280. New York: Routledge.
Hanak, E., and E. Stryjewski. 2012. California’s water market, by the numbers: Update 2012. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Howe, C. W., D. R. Schurmeier, and W. D. Shaw. 1986. “Innovative approaches to water allocation: The potential for water markets.” Water Resour. Res. 22 (4): 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR022i004p00439.
Howitt, R. E. 2014. “Are lease water markets still emerging in California?” In Water markets for the 21st century: What have we learned?, edited by K. W. Easter and Q. Huang. New York: Springer.
Howitt, R. E., and J. R. Lund. 1999. “Measuring the economic impacts of environmental reallocations of water in California.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81 (5): 1268–1272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244120.
Israel, M., and J. R. Lund. 1995. “Recent California water transfers: Implications for water management.” Nat. Resour. J. 35 (Jan): 1–32.
Khokha, S. 2014. “As their wells run dry, California residents blame thirsty farms.” Accessed January 1, 2015. http://www.npr.org/2014/10/19/357273445/as-their-wells-run-dry-california-residents-blame-thirsty-farms.
Libecap, G. D. 2011. “Institutional path dependence in climate adaptation: Coman’s ‘some unsettled problems of irrigation’.” Am. Econ. Rev. 101 (1): 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.1.64.
Regnacq, C., A. Dinar, and E. Hanak. 2016. “The gravity of water: Water trade frictions in California.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 98 (5): 1273–1294. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw051.
Richter, B. D., J. D. Brown, R. DiBenedetto, A. Gorsky, E. Keenan, C. Madray, and S. Ryu. 2017. “Opportunities for saving and reallocating agricultural water to alleviate water scarcity.” Water Policy 19 (5): 886–907. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2017.143.
Rosen, M. D., and R. J. Sexton. 1993. “Irrigation IDs and water markets: An application of cooperative decision-making theory.” Land Econ. 69 (1): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146277.
Schwabe, K., M. Nemati, C. Landry, and G. Zimmerman. 2020. “Water markets in the western United States: Trends and opportunities.” Water 12 (1): 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010233.
Thomas, G. A. 2001. Designing successful groundwater banking programs in the Central Valley: Lessons from experience. San Francisco: Natural Heritage Institute.
Thompson, B. H., Jr. 1993. “Institutional perspectives on water policy and markets.” Calif. Law Rev. 81 (3): 671. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480942.
Vaux, H. J., and R. E. Howitt. 1984. “Managing water scarcity: An evaluation of interregional transfers.” Water Resour. Res. 20 (7): 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i007p00785.
Wyman, K. M. 2019. “Second generation property rights issues.” Nat. Resour. J. 59 (1): 215–240.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 7July 2022

History

Received: Jul 19, 2021
Accepted: Feb 14, 2022
Published online: Apr 20, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 20, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anita M. Chaudhry, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Economics, California State Univ., Chico, CA 95929 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Dean H. K. Fairbanks, Ph.D.
Professor, Dept. of Geography and Planning, California State Univ., Chico, CA 95929.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Seasonal Forecast of the California Water Price Index, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6239, 150, 1, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share