Technical Papers
Mar 10, 2022

Impact of Penalty Policy on Farmers’ Overexploitation Based on Agent-Based Modeling Framework

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 5

Abstract

One strategy to deal with unauthorized groundwater withdrawals by farmers is to impose penalties. Because farmers’ over-exploitation is subject to social, economic, cultural, and agricultural characteristics of the region, feedback assessments of a penalty policy using socio-economic simulation is indispensable. This study presents an agent-based framework to study the interaction among agricultural, environmental, and regulator agents within an agricultural system. The behavior of the agricultural sector was simulated at two levels: agricultural sub-agents, and agricultural group-agents. For agricultural sub-agents, individual benefit was maximized under behavioral and physical constraints simulated by a fuzzy inference system (FIS) and mathematical programing. A coupled linear optimization and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) were adopted to identify the best solution, from the agricultural sector’s viewpoint. The proposed framework was implemented in the Najaf Abad hydrological unit, situated in Isfahan province, central Iran, considering fixed and stepwise penalty approaches. Sensitivity analysis of the amount of base penalty in the fixed penalty scenario indicated that, under a $0.12 per cubic meter penalty, the annual over-exploitation declined from the current 79 million cubic meters (MCM) to zero. Furthermore, the results indicated that if the width of the step increased from 1 to 9  MCM/year, the over-exploitation increased by about 18  MCM/year.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Aghaie, V., H. Alizadeh, and A. Afshar. 2020. “Agent-based hydro-economic modelling for analysis of groundwater-based irrigation water market mechanisms.” Agric. Water Manage. 234 (May): 106140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106140.
Akhbari, M., and N. S. Grigg. 2013. “A framework for an agent-based model to manage water resources conflicts.” Water Resour. Manage. 27 (11): 4039–4052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0394-0.
Al-Amin, S., E. Z. Berglund, G. Mahinthakumar, and K. L. Larson. 2018. “Assessing the effects of water restrictions on socio-hydrologic resilience for shared groundwater systems.” J. Hydrol. 566 (Nov): 872–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.045.
Barreteau, O., F. Bousquet, C. Millier, and J. Weber. 2004. “Suitability of multi-agent simulations to study irrigated system viability: Application to case studies in the Senegal River Valley.” Agric. Syst. 80 (3): 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.07.005.
Berglund, E. Z. 2015. “Using agent-based modeling for water resources planning and management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (11): 04015025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000544.
Castilla-Rho, J. C., G. Mariethoz, R. Rojas, M. S. Andersen, and B. F. J. Kelly. 2015. “An agent-based platform for simulating complex human-aquifer interactions in managed groundwater systems.” Environ. Modell. Software 73 (Nov): 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.018.
Darbandsari, P., R. Kerachian, and S. Malakpour-Estalaki. 2017. “An agent-based behavioral simulation model for residential water demand management: The case-study of Tehran, Iran.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 78 (Nov): 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2017.08.006.
Farhadi, S., M. R. Nikoo, G. R. Rakhshandehroo, M. Akhbari, and M. R. Alizadeh. 2016. “An agent-based-nash modeling framework for sustainable groundwater management: A case study.” Agric. Water Manage. 177 (Nov): 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.018.
Figureau, A. G., M. Montginoul, and J. D. Rinaudo. 2015. “Policy instruments for decentralized management of agricultural groundwater abstraction: A participatory evaluation.” Ecol. Econ. 119: 147–157.
Ghazali, M., T. Honar, and M. R. Nikoo. 2018. “A hybrid TOPSIS-agent-based framework for reducing the water demand requested by stakeholders with considering the agents’ characteristics and optimization of cropping pattern.” Agric. Water Manage. 199 (Feb): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.014.
Giacomoni, M. H., L. Kanta, and E. M. Zechman. 2013. “Complex adaptive systems approach to simulate the sustainability of water resources and urbanization.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 139 (5): 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000302.
Giacomoni, M. H., and E. M. Zechman. 2010. “A complex adaptive systems approach to simulate urban water resources sustainability.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change, 2543–2549. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41114(371)262.
Graveline, N. 2020. “Combining flexible regulatory and economic instruments for agriculture water demand control under climate change in Beauce.” Water Resour. Econ. 29 (Jan): 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2019.100143.
Heydari, F., B. Saghafian, and M. Delavar. 2016. “Coupled quantity-quality simulation-optimization model for conjunctive surface-groundwater use.” Water Resour. Manage. 30 (12): 4381–4397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1426-3.
Kaiser, K. E., A. N. Flores, and V. Hillis. 2020. “Identifying emergent agent types and effective practices for portability, scalability, and intercomparison in water resource agent-based models.” Environ. Modell. Software 127 (May): 104671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104671.
Khan, H. F., Y. C. E. Yang, C. Ringler, S. Wi, M. J. M. Cheema, and M. Basharat. 2017. “Guiding groundwater policy in the Indus Basin of Pakistan using a physically based groundwater model.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 143 (3): 05016014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000733.
Kim, D., and J. J. Kaluarachchi. 2016. “A risk-based hydro-economic analysis for land and water management in water deficit and salinity affected farming regions.” Agric. Water Manage. 166 (Mar): 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.019.
Levin, S., et al. 2013. “Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Modeling and policy implications.” Environ. Dev. Econ. 18 (2): 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x12000460.
Manning, D. T., M. R. Rad, J. F. Suter, C. Goemans, Z. Xiang, and R. Bailey. 2020. “Non-market valuation in integrated assessment modeling: The benefits of water right retirement.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 103: 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102341.
Montginoul, M., J.-D. Rinaudo, N. Brozović, and G. Donoso. 2016. “Controlling groundwater exploitation through economic instruments: Current practices, challenges and innovative approaches.” In Integrated groundwater management, edited by A. J. Jakeman, O. Barreteau, R. J. Hunt, J. D. Rinaudo, and A. Ross. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_22.
Mulligan, K. B., C. Brown, Y.-C. E. Yang, and D. P. Ahlfeld. 2014. “Assessing groundwater policy with coupled economic-groundwater hydrologic modeling.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (3): 2257–2275. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013666.
Nouri, A., B. Saghafian, M. Delavar, and M. R. Bazargan-Lari. 2019. “Agent-based modeling for evaluation of crop pattern and water management policies.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (11): 3707–3720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02327-3.
Ohab-Yazdi, S. A., and A. Ahmadi. 2018. “Using the agent-based model to simulate and evaluate the interaction effects of agent behaviors on groundwater resources, a case study of a sub-basin in the Zayandehroud River Basin.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 87 (Sep): 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.07.003.
Voinov, A., and F. Bousquet. 2010. “Modelling with stakeholders.” Environ. Modell. Software 25 (11): 1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007.
Wolf, A. T. 2008. “Healing the enlightenment rift: Rationality, spirituality and shared waters.” J. Int. Aff. 51–73.
Zhao, J., X. Cai, and Z. Wang. 2013. “Comparing administered and market-based water allocation systems through a consistent agent-based modeling framework.” J. Environ. Manage. 123 (Jul): 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Jan 20, 2021
Accepted: Dec 23, 2021
Published online: Mar 10, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alireza Nouri [email protected]
Ph.D. Graduate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Tehran 1477893855, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Bahram Saghafian [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Tehran 1477893855, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mohammad Reza Bazargan-Lari [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Tehran 1866113118, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Majid Delavar [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Tarbiat Modares Univ., Tehran 14115336, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Amin Hassanjabbar [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Environmental Systems Engineering, Univ. of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada S4S 0A2. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Local water market development based on multi-agent based simulation approach, Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100826, 19, (100826), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share