Technical Papers
Aug 16, 2021

Storm Intensification: Implications for Environmental Design in Maryland

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Extreme precipitation is predicted to increase over the 21st century. Stormwater infrastructure designs based on historic climate experience will have reduced margins of safety and could fail to provide intended levels of services. Climate-adjusted rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves were estimated at locations throughout Maryland for multiple climate models and land cover assumptions and linked to rainfall-runoff models with green and gray stormwater control measures (SCMs). These data are used to evaluate three classes of responses: highway flooding, stream stability, and performance of SCMs. Results suggest greater changes for larger, low recurrence events. Current guidance for road culverts may be inadequate to prevent flooding over their expected design life. Impacts on stream stability and water quality SCMs may be less severe due to smaller anticipated changes in high recurrence events; however, the large variability and incomplete knowledge of uncertainty bounds on future storm event magnitudes create challenges for planning. Given uncertainty in prediction of future precipitation it will be important to choose resilient management strategies that can be adapted as climate evolves.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Available items include Python code for generating the future IDF curves and 90th percentile event analyses, databases of resulting IDF curves, and workbooks summarizing all analyses reported in the paper. Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies (Butcher 2021).

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was provided by the Chesapeake Bay Trust Restoration Research Program under Request #16928. I thank Sadie Drescher (Chesapeake Bay Trust), Ari Engelberg (Maryland Dept. of Natural Resources), and Nancy Roth (Tetra Tech) for providing review and comments. Scott Job of Tetra Tech refined and executed much of the Python programming. Dr. Tan Zi of the San Francisco Estuary Institute implemented the original Python code for the 90th-percentile event analysis described in the Appendix. I acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling, which is responsible for CMIP5, and thank these modeling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP5, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.

References

Abatzoglou, J. T., and T. J. Brown. 2012. “A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications.” Int. J. Climatol. 32 (5): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2312.
Balkema, A. A., and L. de Haan. 1974. “Residual life time at great age.” Ann. Probab. 2 (5): 792–804. https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176996548.
Bledsoe, B. P. 2002. “Stream erosion potential and stormwater management strategies.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 128 (6): 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2002)128:6(451).
Bledsoe, B. P., M. C. Brown, and D. A. Raff. 2007. “GeoTools: A toolkit for fluvial system analysis.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43 (3): 757–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00060.x.
Bledsoe, B. P., and C. C. Watson. 2001. “Logistic analysis of channel pattern thresholds: Meandering, braiding, and incising.” Geomorphology 38 (3–4): 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00099-4.
Bonnin, G. M., D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M. Yekta, and D. Riley. 2006. NOAA Atlas 14, Precipitation-frequency analysis of the United States, volume 2, version 3.0: Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Butcher, J. B. 2021. “Maryland IDF curves (LOCA CMIP5).” Accessed April 27, 2021. https://osf.io/c6fq9/?view_only=2bf5cf00944d4ae788475f44be7f9876.
Butcher, J. B., T. Zi, B. R. Pickard, S. C. Job, T. E. Johnson, and B. A. Groza. 2021. “Efficient statistical approach to develop intensity-duration-frequency curves for precipitation and runoff under future climate.” Clim. Change 164 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02963-y.
Chang, H. H. 1985. “River morphology and thresholds.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 111 (3): 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1985)111:3(503).
Cheng, L., and A. AghaKouchak. 2014. “Nonstationary precipitation intensity-duration-frequency curves for infrastructure design in a changing climate.” Sci. Rep. 4 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07093.
Daly, C., J. I. Smith, and K. V. Olson. 2015. “Mapping atmospheric moisture climatologies across the conterminous United States.” PLoS One 10 (10): e0141140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141140.
Davison, A. C., and R. L. Smith. 1990. “Models for exceedances over high thresholds.” J. R. Stat. Soc. 52 (3): 393–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01796.x.
Dessai, S., and M. Hulme. 2004. “Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities?” Clim. Policy 4 (2): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2004.9685515.
Fassman-Beck, E., S. Wang, R. Simcock, and R. Liu. 2015. “Assessing the effects of bioretention’s engineered media composition and compaction on hydraulic conductivity and water holding capacity.” J. Sustainable Water Built Environ. 1 (4): 04015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000799.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2012. Hydraulic design of highway culverts, third edition. Washington, DC: USDOT and FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2019. “HY-8 culvert hydraulic analysis program.” Accessed May 14, 2020. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/software/hy8/.
Fischbach, J. R., R. J. Lempert, E. Molina-Perez, A. A. Tariq, M. L. Finucane, and F. Hoss. 2015. Managing water quality in the face of uncertainty: A robust decision making demonstration for EPA’s national water program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Galloway, G. E. 2011. “If stationarity is dead, what do we do now?” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 47 (3): 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00550.x.
Groves, D. G., and R. J. Lempert. 2007. “A new analytical method for finding policy-relevant scenarios.” Global Environ. Change 17 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.006.
Hallegatte, S. 2009. “Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change.” Global Environ. Change 19 (2): 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003.
Hayhoe, K., D. J. Wuebbles, D. R. Easterling, D. W. Fahey, S. Doherty, J. Kossin, W. Sweet, R. Vose, and M. Wehner. 2018. “Our changing climate.” Chap. 2 in Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth national climate assessment, volume II, edited by D. R. Reidmiller, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, K. L. M. Lewis, T. K. Maycock, and B. C. Stewart. Washington, DC: US Global Change Research Program.
Hoffman, J., E. Rowland, C. Hawkins Hoffman, J. West, S. Herrod-Julius, and M. Hayes. 2014. “Decision making under uncertainty.” Chap. 12 in Climate-smart conservation: Putting adaptation principles into practice, edited by B. A. Stein, P. Glick, N. Edelson, and A. Staudt. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation.
Hosking, J. R. M., and J. R. Wallis. 1997. Regional frequency analysis, an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kalra, N., S. Hallegatte, R. Lempert, C. Brown, A. Fozzard, S. Gill, and A. Shah. 2014. “Agreeing on robust decisions: New processes for decision making under deep uncertainty.” Accessed January 23, 2021. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/18772/WPS6906.pdf.
Kilgore R. T., G. Herrmann, W. O. Thomas Jr., and D. B. Thompson. 2016. Highways in the river environment—Floodplains, extreme events, risk, and resilience. Washington, DC: USDOT and FHWA.
Langousis, A., A. Mamalakis, M. Puliga, and R. Deidda. 2016. “Threshold detection for the generalized Pareto distribution: Review of representative methods and application to the NOAA NCDC daily rainfall database.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (4): 2659–2681. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018502.
Li, H., J. Sheffield, and E. F. Wood. 2010. “Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching.” J. Geophys. Res. D: Atmos. 115 (10): D10101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012882.
Livneh, B., T. J. Bohn, D. W. Pierce, F. Munoz-Arriola, B. Nijssen, R. Vose, and L. Brekke. 2015. “A spatially comprehensive, hydrometeorological data set for Mexico, the US, and Southern Canada 1950–2013.” Sci. Data 2 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.42.
Maraun, D., et al. 2010. “Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user.” Rev. Geophys. 48 (3): RG3003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000314.
MDE (Maryland Department of the Environment). 2009. 2000 Maryland stormwater design manual, volumes I and II (revised May 2009). Baltimore: MDE.
MDOT-SHA (Maryland DOT, State Highway Administration). 2009. Highway drainage manual design guidelines. Culverts. Baltimore: MDOT-SHA.
Mehran, A., A. AghaKouchak, and T. J. Philips. 2014. “Evaluation of CMIP5 continental precipitation simulations relative to satellite-based gauge-adjusted observations.” J. Geophys. Res. D: Atmos. 119 (4): 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021152.
Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. “Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?” Science 319 (5863): 573–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2017. “Precipitation frequency data server.” Accessed June 14, 2021. https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/index.html.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Washington, DC: USDA and NRCS.
Palmer, M. A., et al. 2005. “Standards for ecologically successful river restoration.” J. Appl. Ecol. 42 (2): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x.
Perica, S., D. Martin, S. Pavlovic, I. Roy, M. St. Laurent, C. Trypaluk, D. Unruh, M. Yekta, and G. Bonnin. 2013. Precipitation-frequency Atlas of the United States. NOAA Atlas no. 14, volume 8 version 2.0: Midwestern states (Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Wisconsin). Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Pickands, J., III. 1975. “Statistical inference using extreme order statistics.” Ann. Stat. 3 (1): 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176343003.
Pierce, D. W., D. R. Cayan, and B. L. Thrasher. 2014. “Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA).” J. Hydrometeorol. 15 (6): 2558–2585. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1.
Raff, D. A., B. P. Bledsoe, A. N. Flores, and M. C. Brown. 2007. GeoTools user’s manual. Fort Collins, CO: Engineering Research Center, Colorado State Univ.
Ragno, E., A. AghaKouchak, C. A. Love, L. Cheng, F. Vahedifard, and C. H. R. Lima. 2018. “Quantifying changes in future intensity-duration-frequency curves using multimodel ensemble simulations.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (3): 1751–1764. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021975.
Rossman, L. 2015. Storm water management model, user’s manual version 5.1. Cincinnati: National Risk Management Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US EPA.
Schall, J. D., P. L. Thompson, S. M. Zerges, R. T. Kilgore, and J. L. Morris. 2012. Hydraulic design of highway culverts, third edition. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Serinaldi, F., and C. G. Kilsby. 2014. “Rainfall extremes: Toward reconciliation after the battle of distributions.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (1): 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014211.
Sillmann, J., V. V. Kharin, X. Zhang, F. W. Zwiers, and D. Bronaugh. 2013. “Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate.” J. Geophys. Res. D: Atmos. 118 (4): 1716–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50203.
Simon, A., W. Dickerson, and A. Heins. 2004. “Suspended-sediment transport rates at the 1.5-year recurrence interval for ecoregions of the United States: Transport conditions at the bankfull and effective discharge?” Geomorphology 58 (1–4): 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2003.07.003.
USGCRP (US Global Change Research Program). 2018. Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth national climate assessment, volume II. Edited by D. R. Reidmiller, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, K. L. M. Lewis, T. K. Maycock, and B. C. Stewart. Washington, DC: USGCRP.
Wang, G., C. J. Kirchhoff, A. Seth, J. T. Abatzoglou, B. Livneh, D. W. Pierce, L. Fomenko, and T. Ding. 2020. “Projected changes of precipitation characteristics depend on downscaling method and training data: MACA versus LOCA using the US Northeast as an example.” J. Hydrometeorol. 21 (12): 2739–2758. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0275.1.
Weaver, C. P., R. J. Lempert, C. Brown, J. A. Hall, D. Revell, and D. Sarewitz. 2013. “Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: The value and demands of robust decision frameworks.” WIREs Clim. Change 4 (1): 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.202.
West, J. M., C. A. Courtney, A. T. Hamilton, B. A. Parker, D. A. Gibbs, P. Bradley, and S. H. Julius. 2018. “Adaptation design tool for climate-smart management of coral reefs and other natural resources.” Environ. Manage. 62 (4): 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1065-y.
West, J. M., S. H. Julius, and C. P. Weaver. 2012. “Assessing confidence in management adaptation approaches for climate-sensitive ecosystems.” Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (1): 014016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014016.
Wilby, R. L., et al. 2010. “Evidence needed to manage freshwater ecosystems in a changing climate: Turning adaptation principles into practice.” Sci. Total Environ. 408 (19): 4150–4164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.014.
Wolman, M. G., and J. P. Miller. 1960. “Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes.” J. Geol. 68 (1): 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/626637.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Dec 3, 2020
Accepted: May 9, 2021
Published online: Aug 16, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 16, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.H.
Senior Hydrologist, Tetra Tech, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1894-4419. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share