Case Studies
Jul 20, 2021

IGDT-Based Medium-Term Optimal Cascade Hydropower Operation in Multimarket with Hydrologic and Economic Uncertainties

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Hydrologic uncertainty and economic uncertainty both affect market-oriented hydropower operation. For medium-term cascade hydropower operation, the uncertainties of daily reservoir inflow and market clearing power price can pose risks to operation, especially when power stations participate in multiple power markets. It is difficult to obtain the fluctuation range of uncertain variables for different expected power sale profits, and to plan the operation range of cascade hydropower stations. For a cascade hydropower system dispatching power to two markets, this work developed a risk assessment method for medium-term optimal cascade hydropower operation based on information gap decision-making theory (IGDT). We established a bilevel stochastic IGDT model for the main hydrologic and economic uncertainties in hydropower market participation. The lower-level model solves the minimum robustness profit or maximum opportunity profit from power sale, and the upper-level model solves the maximum robustness fluctuation range or minimum opportunity fluctuation range of the uncertain variables for different expected profits. Then we converted the bilevel model to two equivalent single-level models, and provided solutions. The proposed method does not require the probability distribution of uncertain variables, which is often unavailable; moreover, it reduces computational complexity while ensuring accuracy of results. The proposed method can provide decision makers with reasonable power dispatch options. This work used a cascade hydropower system in Southwest China as a case study. The proposed method provided acceptable fluctuation range of uncertain reservoir inflow and power price under different expected profits, and provided the operation range to guarantee the expected profit. Decision makers with different risk preferences can evaluate various strategies to optimize medium-term cascade hydropower operation to ensure the expected profit.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Most data used in this study appear in the published article, and are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51879030 and 52039002). The authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their constructive comments.

References

Barros, M. T., F. T. Tsai, S. L. Yang, E. G. Lopes, and W. W. Yeh. 2003. “Optimization of large-scale hydropower system operations.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 129 (3): 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(178).
Ben-Haim, Y. 2006. Info-gap decision theory: Decisions under severe uncertainty. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
Brown, C., Y. Ghile, M. Laverty, and K. Li. 2012. “Decision scaling: Linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (9): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011212.
Camal, S., F. Teng, A. Michiorri, G. Kariniotakis, and L. Badesa. 2019. “Scenario generation of aggregated wind, photovoltaics and small hydro production for power systems applications.” Appl. Energy 242 (May): 1396–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.112.
Carrión, M., J. M. Arroyo, and A. J. Conejo. 2009. “A bilevel stochastic programming approach for retailer futures market trading.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24 (3): 1446–1456. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2019777.
Chen, K., W. Wu, B. Zhang, and H. Sun. 2014. “Robust restoration decision-making model for distribution networks based on information gap decision theory.” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6 (2): 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2363100.
Cheng, C., F. Chen, G. Li, B. Ristić, A. Mirchi, T. Qiyu, and K. Madani. 2018. “Reform and renewables in China: The architecture of Yunnan’s hydropower dominated electricity market.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 94 (Oct): 682–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.033.
Garcés, L. P., A. J. Conejo, R. García-Bertrand, and R. Romero. 2009. “A bilevel approach to transmission expansion planning within a market environment.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24 (3): 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021230.
García-González, J., E. Parrilla, and A. Mateo. 2007. “Risk-averse profit-based optimal scheduling of a hydro-chain in the day-ahead electricity market.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 (3): 1354–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.047.
Gianfreda, A. 2010. “Volatility and volume effects in European electricity spot markets.” Econ. Notes 39 (1–2): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0300.2009.00220.x.
Hansen, P. V. 2009. “Inflow uncertainty in hydropower markets.” Scand. J. Econ. 111 (1): 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.01559.x.
Inzunza, A., R. Moreno, A. Bernales, and H. Rudnick. 2016. “CVaR constrained planning of renewable generation with consideration of system inertial response, reserve services and demand participation.” Energy Econ. 59 (Sep): 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.020.
Jaworski, P., F. Durante, W. K. Hardle, and T. Rychlik. 2010. Copula theory and its applications. Berlin: Springer.
Kasprzyk, J. R., S. Nataraj, P. M. Reed, and R. J. Lempert. 2013. “Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change.” Environ. Modell. Software 42 (Apr): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.007.
Lempert, R. J., S. W. Popper, D. G. Groves, N. Kalra, J. R. Fischbach, S. C. Bankes, and D. J. McInerney. 2013. Making good decisions without predictions: Robust decision making for planning under deep uncertainty. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Li, X., S. Guo, P. Liu, and G. Chen. 2010. “Dynamic control of flood limited water level for reservoir operation by considering inflow uncertainty.” J. Hydrol. 391 (1–2): 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.011.
Liu, S., Q. Yang, H. Cai, M. Yan, M. Zhang, D. Wu, and M. Xie. 2019. “Market reform of Yunnan electricity in southwestern China: Practice, challenges and implications.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 113 (Oct): 109265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109265.
Löhndorf, N., D. Wozabal, and S. Minner. 2013. “Optimizing trading decisions for hydro storage systems using approximate dual dynamic programming.” Oper. Res. 61 (4): 810–823. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1182.
Lu, J., G. Li, C. Cheng, and H. Yu. 2020. “Risk analysis method of cascade plants operation in medium term based on multi-scale market and settlement rules.” IEEE Access 8: 90730–90740. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994093.
Marchau, V. A., W. E. Walker, P. J. Bloemen, and S. W. Popper. 2019. Decision making under deep uncertainty: From theory to practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., H. Zareipour, N. Amjady, and M. Ehsan. 2013. “Application of information-gap decision theory to risk-constrained self-scheduling of GenCos.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28 (2): 1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2212727.
Moiseeva, E., and M. R. Hesamzadeh. 2018. “Strategic bidding of a hydropower producer under uncertainty: Modified benders approach.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33 (1): 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2696058.
Moradi-Dalvand, M., B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, N. Amjady, H. Zareipour, and A. Mazhab-Jafari. 2015. “Self-scheduling of a wind producer based on information gap decision theory.” Energy 81 (Mar): 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.002.
Nelsen, R. B. 2006. An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.
Saâdaoui, F. 2013. “The price and trading volume dynamics relationship in the EEX power market: A wavelet modeling.” Comput. Econ. 42 (1): 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-012-9346-7.
Soroudi, A. 2013. “Robust optimization based self scheduling of hydro-thermal Genco in smart grids.” Energy 61 (Nov): 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.014.
Soroudi, A., and M. Ehsan. 2013. “IGDT based robust decision making tool for DNOs in load procurement under severe uncertainty.” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4 (2): 886–895. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2012.2214071.
Wu, X., C. Cheng, S. Miao, G. Li, and S. Li. 2020. “Long-term market competition analysis for hydropower stations using SSDP-games.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (6): 04020037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001195.
Xu, B., P. A. Zhong, B. Du, J. Chen, W. Liu, J. Li, and Y. Zhao. 2018. “Analysis of a stochastic programming model for optimal hydropower system operation under a deregulated electricity market by considering forecasting uncertainty.” Water 10 (7): 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070885.
Xu, B., P. A. Zhong, R. C. Zambon, Y. Zhao, and W. W. G. Yeh. 2015. “Scenario tree reduction in stochastic programming with recourse for hydropower operations.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (8): 6359–6380. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016828.
Xu, W., C. Zhang, Y. Peng, G. Fu, and H. Zhou. 2014. “A two stage Bayesian stochastic optimization model for cascaded hydropower systems considering varying uncertainty of flow forecasts.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (12): 9267–9286. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015181.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Nov 17, 2020
Accepted: Apr 25, 2021
Published online: Jul 20, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 20, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Institute of Hydropower and Hydroinformatics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7099-1589. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Institute of Hydropower and Hydroinformatics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
M.D. Student, Institute of Hydropower and Hydroinformatics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Chuntian Cheng [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Hydropower and Hydroinformatics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Medium-Term Scheduling and Transaction Decision Method for Cascade Hydropower Stations Based on IGDT and Prospect Theory, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6003, 149, 9, (2023).
  • Optimal Decomposition for the Monthly Contracted Electricity of Cascade Hydropower Plants Considering the Bidding Space in the Day-Ahead Spot Market, Water, 10.3390/w14152347, 14, 15, (2347), (2022).
  • Optimum day-ahead clearing for high proportion hydropower market considering complex hydraulic connection, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108211, 141, (108211), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share