Case Studies
Jan 15, 2021

Benefit of PARMA Modeling for Long-Term Hydroelectric Scheduling Using Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147, Issue 3

Abstract

In the long-term management of large hydropower systems, operators generally have to maximize the benefits from energy production while ensuring they satisfy a minimal energy profile throughout the year. Enhanced hydrological information can be critical to improving the operations of the system. This need encourages the use of a more complex representation of inflow series. Stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP) is a commonly used method for optimizing multireservoir operations of hydropower systems. Within SDDP, inflow uncertainty is usually modeled using statistical time-series models such as the family of periodic autoregressive (PAR) models, which have the required linear structure to implement SDDP. Although often used in hydrological modeling for its ability to represent long-term spatiotemporal relationships, periodic autoregressive and moving average (PARMA) has yet been little used in a SDDP framework. The additional moving average component of PARMA models over PAR models provides PARMA with a deeper memory than PAR, thanks to a more complex correlation structure. This paper compares policies generated by PARMA and PAR to manage the Manicouagan hydropower system in Quebec, Canada. The comparison is made between PAR and PARMA models of the same autoregressive order to illustrate the advantages of including the moving average component. Simulations over historical scenarios are performed and reveal that PARMA derives policies that can better manage the interannual capacity present in the system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used for the study are private industrial data of a Hydro-Quebec Production, the authority in charge of the generation of hydroelectric in Quebec’s region. They are not available for the general public. For all data requests, the agreement of Hydro-Quebec Production is required and should be asked accordingly.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the reviewers, the Associate Editor, and the Editor for their constructive suggestions, which helped improve the quality of the present paper. The authors thank Laura Fagherazzi at Hydro-Quebec’s production planning unit, who provided the tools to calibrate and analyze the different hydrological models used in the paper. Finally, the authors thank the optimization practitioners of the team Planification and Strategies for their critical comments, insights, and disponibility throughout the study.

References

Anderson, P. L., M. M. Meerschaert, and A. V. Vecchia. 1999. “Innovations algorithm for periodically stationary time series.” Stochastic Processes Appl. 83 (1): 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4149(99)00027-7.
Bartolini, P., and J. D. Salas. 1993. “Modeling of streamflow processes at different time scales.” Water Resour. Res. 29 (8): 2573–2587. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00747.
Bellman, R. 1961. Adaptive control processes: A guided tour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Birge, J. R., and F. Louveaux. 1997. Introduction to stochastic programming. Berlin: Springer.
Castelletti, A., D. De Rigo, A. E. Rizzoli, R. Soncini-Sessa, and E. Weber. 2007. “Neuro-dynamic programming for designing water reservoir network management policies.” Control Eng. Pract. 15 (8): 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.02.011.
Cervellera, C., V. C. P. Chen, and A. Wen. 2006. “Optimization of a large-scale water reservoir network by stochastic dynamic programming with efficient state space discretization.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171 (3): 1139–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.022.
Girardeau, P., V. Leclere, and A. B. Philpott. 2014. “On the convergence of decomposition methods for multistage stochastic convex programs.” Math. Oper. Res. 40 (1): 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2014.0664.
Gjerden, K. S., A. Helseth, B. Mo, and G. Warland. 2015. “Hydrothermal scheduling in Norway using stochastic dual dynamic programming; a large-scale case study.” In Proc., 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, 1–6. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PTC.2015.7232278.
Hersbach, H. 2000. “Decomposition of the continuous ranked probability score for ensemble prediction systems.” Weather Forecasting 15 (5): 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015%3C0559:DOTCRP%3E2.0.CO;2.
Homem-De Mello, T., V. L. De Matos, and E. C. Finardi. 2011. “Sampling strategies and stopping criteria for stochastic dual dynamic programming: A case study in long-term hydrothermal scheduling.” Energy Syst. 2 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-011-0024-y.
Infanger, G., and D. P. Morton. 1996. “Cut sharing for multistage stochastic linear programs with interstage dependency.” Math. Program. 75 (2): 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592154.
Lohmann, T., A. S. Hering, and S. Rebennack. 2016. “Spatio-temporal hydro forecasting of multireservoir inflows for hydro-thermal scheduling.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255 (1): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.011.
Maceira, M., and J. Damazio. 2006. “Use of the PAR(p) model in the stochastic dual dynamic programming optimization scheme used in the operation planning of the Brazilian hydropower system.” Probab. Eng. Inf. Sci. 20 (1): 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964806060098.
Maceira, M. E. P., V. S. Duarte, D. D. J. Penna, L. A. M. Moraes, and A. C. G. Melo. 2008. “Ten years of application of stochastic dual dynamic programming in official and agent studies in brazil-description of the newave program.” In Proc., 16th Power Systems Computation Conf., 14–18. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ELECTROBRAS Group.
Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. 2019. “La géobase du réseau hydrographique du Québec.” Accessed August 10, 2020. https://mern.gouv.qc.ca/repertoire-geographique/reseau-hydrographique-grhq/.
Pereira, M. V. F., and L. M. V. G. Pinto. 1985. “Stochastic optimization of a multireservoir hydroelectric system: A decomposition approach.” Water Resour. Res. 21 (6): 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i006p00779.
Pereira, M. V. F., and L. M. V. G. Pinto. 1991. “Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning.” Math. Program. 52 (1): 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582895.
Philpott, A. B., and Z. Guan. 2008. “On the convergence of stochastic dual dynamic programming and related methods.” Oper. Res. Lett. 36 (4): 450–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2008.01.013.
Pina, J. A., A. Tilmant, and P. Côté. 2017. “Optimizing multireservoir system operating policies using exogenous hydrologic variables.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (11): 9845–9859. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021701.
Poorsepahy-Samian, H., V. Espanmanesh, and B. Zahraie. 2016. “Improved inflow modeling in stochastic dual dynamic programming.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 142 (12): 04016065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000713.
Pritchard, G. 2015. “Stochastic inflow modeling for hydropower scheduling problems.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 246 (2): 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.022.
Rasmussen, P. F., L. Mathier, J. D. Salas, L. Fagherazzi, and J. C. Rassam. 1995. “Calibration of a multivariate PARMA model for the Ottawa river system.” Accessed May 23, 2020. http://espace.inrs.ca/id/eprint/1191/1/R000432.pdf.
Rasmussen, P. F., J. D. Salas, L. Fagherazzi, J.-C. Rassam, and B. Bobée. 1996. “Estimation and validation of contemporaneous PARMA models for streamflow simulation.” Water Resour. Res. 32 (10): 3151–3160. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR01528.
Raso, L., P.-O. Malaterre, and J.-C. Bader. 2017. “Effective streamflow process modeling for optimal reservoir operation using stochastic dual dynamic programming.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 143 (4): 04017003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000746.
Rotting, T. A., and A. Gjelsvik. 1992. “Stochastic dual dynamic programming for seasonal scheduling in the Norwegian power system.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 7 (1): 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.141714.
Saad, M., A. Turgeon, P. Bigras, and P. Duquette. 1994. “Learning disaggregation technique for the operation of long-term hydroelectric power systems.” Water Resour. Res. 30 (11): 3195–3202. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR01731.
Salas, J. D., J. W. Delleur, V. Yevjevich, and W. L. Lane. 1980. Applied modeling of Hydrologic time series. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications.
Salas, J. D., and J. T. B. Obeysekera. 1992. “Conceptual basis of seasonal streamflow time series models.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 118 (8): 1186–1194. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:8(1186).
Shapiro, A. 2011. “Analysis of stochastic dual dynamic programming method.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 209 (1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.007.
Shapiro, A., and P. R. Andrzej. 2003. Stochastic programming. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Tejada-Guibert, J. A., S. A. Johnson, and J. R. Stedinger. 1993. “Comparison of two approaches for implementing multireservoir operating policies derived using stochastic dynamic programming.” Water Resour. Res. 29 (12): 3969–3980. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR02277.
Tesfaye, Y. G., M. M. Meerschaert, and P. L. Anderson. 2006. “Identification of periodic autoregressive moving average models and their application to the modeling of river flows.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (1): W01419. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003772.
Tilmant, A., and R. Kelman. 2007. “A stochastic approach to analyze trade-offs and risks associated with large-scale water resources systems.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (6): W06425. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005094.
Tilmant, A., D. Pinte, and Q. Goor. 2008. “Assessing marginal water values in multipurpose multireservoir systems via stochastic programming.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (12): W12431. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007024.
Turgeon, A. 2005. “Solving a stochastic reservoir management problem with multilag autocorrelated inflows.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (12): W12414. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003846.
Vecchia, A. V. 1985a. “Maximum likelihood estimation for periodic autoregressive moving average models.” Technometrics 27 (4): 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1985.10488076.
Vecchia, A. V. 1985b. “Periodic autoregressive-moving average (PARMA) modeling with applications to water resources.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 21 (5): 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb00167.x.
Vecchia, A. V., J. T. Obeysekera, J. D. Salas, and D. C. Boes. 1983. “Aggregation and estimation for low-order periodic ARMA models.” Water Resour. Res. 19 (5): 1297–1306. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i005p01297.
Yildiran, U. 2019. “Nonnegative wind speed time series models for SDDP and stochastic programming applications.” In Proc., 2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe), 1–5. New York: IEEE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147Issue 3March 2021

History

Received: Feb 13, 2020
Accepted: Sep 18, 2020
Published online: Jan 15, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 15, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation and the Dept. of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3A7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8983-3065. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Full Professor, Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation and the Dept. of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3A7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-3648. Email: [email protected]
G. Emiel, Ph.D. [email protected]
Risk Analysis, Dept. of Finance, Hydro-Quebec, 75, boul. René-Lévesque Ouest, Montréal, QC, Canada H2Z 1A4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share