Optimization Framework to Assess the Demand Response Capacity of a Water Distribution System
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 146, Issue 8
Abstract
As large electricity consumers, water distribution system (WDS) pumping stations have the potential to become meaningful participants in demand response (DR) programs. The authors propose an optimization framework for assessing the DR capacity of a WDS and identifying the optimal bidding strategy for maximizing WDS revenue in the DR spot market. The proposed mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model overcomes computational constraints of previous DR optimization models by adopting a preprocessing procedure to minimize the number of binary variables and implementing a convex relaxation technique to linearize the hydraulic equations. The proposed MILP model also explicitly accounts for varying levels of risk tolerance of WDS operators by varying the recovery period over which pumping returns to business-as-usual operation. The optimization framework is implemented on a skeletonized 48-node WDS model that includes 7 pumps, 6 tanks, and 39 pipes. Using a simulated DR event and water consumption profile, the authors derive the optimal DR supply curves (i.e., compensation price versus load curtailment quantity) and revenue potential of the WDS under six scenarios for DR participation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, discretionary funds of M. Mauter at Stanford and CMU, and the Center for Climate and Energy Decision Making through a cooperative agreement between CMU and NSF (SES-0949710).
References
Abbott, M., and B. Cohen. 2009. “Productivity and efficiency in the water industry.” Util. Policy 17 (3–4): 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2009.05.001.
Albadi, M. H., and E. F. El-Saadany. 2008. “A summary of demand response in electricity markets.” Electron. Power Syst. Res. 78 (11): 1989–1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2008.04.002.
Chen, L., N. Li, S. H. Low, and J. C. Doyle. 2010. “Two market models for demand response in power networks.” In Proc., 1st IEEE Int. Conf. on Smart Grid Communications, 397–402. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
D’Ambrosio, C., A. Lodi, S. Wiese, and C. Bragalli. 2015. “Mathematical programming techniques in water network optimization.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 243 (3): 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.039.
Electric Power Research Institute. 2013. Electricity use and management in the municipal water supply and wastewater industries, 1–194. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
Energyonline.com. 2018. “Average wholesale price of electricity in CAISO.” Accessed May 12, 2018. http://www.energyonline.com/Data/GenericData.aspx?DataId=20&CAISO___Average_Price.
Ghaddar, B., J. Naoum-Sawaya, A. Kishimoto, N. Taheri, and B. Eck. 2015. “A Lagrangian decomposition approach for the pump scheduling problem in water networks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 241 (2): 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.033.
Gils, H. C. 2016. “Economic potential for future demand response in Germany—Modeling approach and case study.” Appl. Energy 162 (Jan): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.083.
Gingerich, D. B., and M. S. Mauter. 2018. “Air emission reduction benefits of biogas electricity generation at municipal wastewater treatment plants.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (3): 1633–1643. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04649.
Klise, K. A., M. Bynum, D. Moriarty, and R. Murray. 2017a. “A software framework for assessing the resilience of drinking water systems to disasters with an example earthquake case study.” Environ. Modell. Software 95 (Sep): 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.022.
Klise, K. A., D. Hart, D. M. Moriarty, M. L. Bynum, R. Murray, J. Burkhardt, and T. Haxton. 2017b. Water network tool for resilience (WNTR) user manual. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Klise, K. A., R. Murray, and T. Haxton. 2018. “An overview of the Water Network Tool for Resilience (WNTR) software capabilities.” In Proc., 1st Int. WDSA/CCWI 2018 Joint Conf. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Kreyzsig, E., H. Kreyszig, and E. J. Norminton. 2011. Advanced engineering mathematics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lansey, K. E., and K. Awumah. 1994. “Optimal pump operations considering pump switches.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 120 (1): 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:1(17).
López-Ibáñez, M., T. D. Prasad, and B. Paechter. 2008. “Ant colony optimization for optimal control of pumps in water distribution networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 134 (4): 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:4(337).
Ma, O., et al. 2013. “Demand response for ancillary services.” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4 (4): 1988–1995. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2013.2258049.
Macak, J. 2002. Evaluation of gas turbine startup and shutdown emissions for new source permitting, 1–13. Chicago: Mostardi Platt Environmental.
Marchi, A., A. R. Simpson, and M. F. Lambert. 2017. “Pump operation optimization using rule-based controls.” Procedia Eng. 186 (Jan): 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.229.
McCormick, G., and R. S. Powell. 2004. “Derivation of near-optimal pump schedules for water distribution by simulated annealing.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55 (7): 728–736. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601718.
Menke, R., E. Abraham, P. Parpas, and I. Stoianov. 2016. “Demonstrating demand response from water distribution system through pump scheduling.” Appl. Energy 170 (May): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.136.
Menke, R., E. Abraham, P. Parpas, and I. Stoianov. 2017. “Extending the envelope of demand response provision though variable speed pumps.” Procedia Eng. 186: 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.274.
Morsi, A., B. Geißler, and A. Martin. 2012. “Mixed integer optimization of water supply networks.” In Mathematical optimization of water networks, 35–54. Basel, Switzerland: Springer.
Odan, F. K., L. F. Ribeiro Reis, and Z. Kapelan. 2015. “Real-time multiobjective optimization of operation of water supply systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (9): 04015011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000515.
Oikonomou, K., M. Parvania, and R. Khatami. 2018. “Optimal demand response scheduling for water distribution systems.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14 (11): 5112–5122. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2801334.
Rossman, L. A. 2000. EPANET2 user’s manual. Cincinati: National Risk Management Research Laboratory.
Savic, D. A., G. A. Walters, and M. Schwab. 1997. Multiobjective genetic algorithms for pump scheduling in water supply, 227–235. Berlin: Springer.
Sparn, B., and R. Hunsberger. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for water and wastewater industries to provide exchangeable services. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
US DoE. 2006. Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them. Washington, DC: US DoE.
Van Zyl, J. E. 2001. A methodology for improved operational optimization of water distribution systems. Exeter, UK: Univ. of Exeter.
Van Zyl, J. E., D. A. Savic, and G. A. Walters. 2004. “Operational optimization of water distribution systems using a hybrid genetic algorithm.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 130 (2): 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(160).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 9, 2019
Accepted: Feb 24, 2020
Published online: May 29, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.