Technical Notes
Mar 14, 2020

Effects of Demand, Mixing Fraction, and Rate Coefficient Uncertainty on Water Quality Models

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 146, Issue 5

Abstract

The effects uncertainty on water quality predictions by the free water distribution modeling software created by the US Environment Protection Agency (EPANET2) are assessed using both design of experiments (DOE) and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). For the test system evaluated, the DOE approach describes the effects of uncertainty with as few as eight model executions and yet shows good agreement with the more computationally demanding MCS approach. Surprisingly, first order disinfectant decay models are less sensitive to uncertainty than water age, even though an additional rate coefficient is required. This is likely because disinfectant residuals are bounded between the input concentration and zero, while water age is not. At nodes affected by water storage, up to 40% of the variability in disinfectant residual is attributed to uncertainty in tank mixing fraction (TMF). Due to seasonal and diurnal changes in water temperature, density, and mixing behavior, the TMF is inherently uncertain. Strategies to address this include MCS or sensitivity analysis using DOE. Inclusion of a wall decay coefficient appears to increase model sensitivity to uncertainty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the anonymous reviewers who greatly improved the quality of this work.

References

Andrade, M. A., C. Y. Choi, K. Lansey, and D. Jung. 2016. “Enhanced artificial neural networks estimating water quality constraints for the optimal water distribution systems design.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 142 (9): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000663.
Castelletti, A., F. Pianosi, R. Soncini-Sessa, and J. P. Antenucci. 2010. “A multiobjective response surface approach for improved water quality planning in lakes and reservoirs: Response surface for quality planning.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (6): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008389.
Chowdhury, S., P. Champagne, and P. J. McLellan. 2009. “Models for predicting disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation in drinking waters: A chronological review.” Sci. Total Environ. 407 (14): 4189–4206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.04.006.
Clark, R. M. 2015. “The USEPA’s distribution system water quality modelling program: A historical perspective: The USEPA’s distribution system research program.” Water Environ. J. 29: 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12132.
Dridi, L., A. Mailhot, M. Parizeau, and J.-P. Villeneuve. 2009. “Multiobjective approach for pipe replacement based on bayesian inference of break model parameters.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 135 (5): 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:5(344).
Hallam, N. B., J. R. West, C. F. Forster, J. C. Powell, and I. Spencer. 2002. “The decay of chlorine associated with the pipe wall in water distribution systems.” Water Res. 36 (14): 3479–3488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00056-8.
Mahmood, F., J. G. Pimblett, N. O. Grace, and W. M. Grayman. 2005. “Evaluation of water mixing characteristics in distribution system storage tanks.” Am. Water Works Assoc. J. 97 (3): 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2005.tb10846.x.
Mohapatra, S., A. Sargaonkar, and P. K. Labhasetwar. 2014. “Distribution network assessment using EPANET for intermittent and continuous water supply.” Water Resour. Manage. 28 (11): 3745–3759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0707-y.
Muranho, J., A. Ferreira, J. Sousa, A. Gomes, and A. S. Marques. 2014. “Technical performance evaluation of water distribution networks based on EPANET.” Procedia Eng. 70: 1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.133.
Rossman, L. A. 2000. EPANET 2 users manual EPA/600/R-00/057. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Rossman, L. A., R. A. Brown, P. C. Singer, and J. R. Nuckols. 2001. “DBP formation kinetics in a simulated distribution system.” Water Res. 35 (14): 3483–3489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00059-8.
Seyoum, A. G., and T. T. Tanyimboh. 2017. “Integration of hydraulic and water quality modelling in distribution networks: EPANET-PMX.” Water Resour. Manage. 31 (14): 4485–4503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1760-0.
Speight, V., and J. Boxall. 2015. “Current perspectives on disinfectant modeling.” Procedia Eng. 119: 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.906.
Vasconceles, J., L. A. Rossman, W. M. Grayman, P. Boulus, and R. M. Clark. 1997. “Kinetics of chlorine decay.” Am. Water Works Assoc. J. 89 (7): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08259.x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 146Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Jun 21, 2019
Accepted: Dec 6, 2019
Published online: Mar 14, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 14, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Consultant and Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 50 Stephanie St., Suite 2405, Toronto, ON Canada M5T 1B3 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0915-8130. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Bryan Karney, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Dean, Cross-Disciplinary Programs, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. Email: [email protected]
Yiping Guo, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share