Case Studies
Feb 20, 2020

Assessing the Impacts of Urban Water-Use Restrictions at the District Level: Case Study of California’s Drought Mandate

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 146, Issue 5

Abstract

This paper estimates feasible water savings for a sample of nine urban water districts in California during the height of the 2012–2016 drought, just prior to the implementation of mandatory water-use reductions, using household production theory and stochastic frontier analysis. Estimates of feasible savings are compared to mandated reductions and actual reductions in each district. Although the mandated reductions were generally feasible, the results reported here show that they had asymmetric impacts across districts and tended to impose larger burdens on some disadvantaged groups.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this paper compose a large household-level data set that includes monthly water consumption records and household characteristics considered by the water districts to be confidential information. The code generated during the study is available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, Hatch Project CA-R-ENS-5087-H.

References

Aigner, D., C. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. 1977. “Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models.” J. Econom. 6 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5.
Amsler, C., A. Prokhorov, and P. Schmidt. 2016. “Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models.” J. Econom. 190 (2): 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.013.
Baerenklau, K. A., K. A. Schwabe, and A. Dinar. 2014. “The residential water demand effect of increasing block rate water budgets.” Land Econ. 90 (4): 683–699. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.4.683.
Becker, G. S. 1965. “A theory of the allocation of time.” Econ. J. 75 (299): 493–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949.
Blasch, J., N. Boogen, M. Filippini, and N. Kumar. 2017. “Explaining electricity demand and the role of energy and investment literacy on end-use efficiency of Swiss households.” Supplement, Energy Econ. 68 (S1): 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.004.
Cook, B. I., J. S. Mankin, and K. J. Anchukaitis. 2018. “Climate change and drought: From past to future.” Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 4 (2): 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0093-2.
Filippini, M., and L. C. Hunt. 2011. “Energy demand and energy efficiency in the OECD countries: A stochastic demand frontier approach.” Energy J. 32 (2): 59–80. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No2-3.
Filippini, M., and L. C. Hunt. 2015. “Measurement of energy efficiency based on economic foundations.” Supplement, Energy Econ. 52 (S1): S5–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.023.
Kay, R. D., W. M. Edwards, and P. A. Duffy. 1994. Farm management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kumbhakar, S., and C. Lovell. 2000. Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lund, J., J. Medellin-Azuara, J. Durand, and K. Stone. 2018. “Lessons from California’s 2012–2016 Drought.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (10): 04018067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000984.
Lund, J., and R. Reed. 1995. “Drought water rationing and transferable rations.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 121 (6): 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1995)121:6(429).
McCann, H., E. Hanak, K. A. Baerenklau, A. Escrivá-Bou, D. Mitchell, and K. A. Schwabe. 2017. Building drought resilience in California’s cities and suburbs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Mitchell, D., E. Hanak, K. A. Baerenklau, A. Escrivá-Bou, H. McCann, M. Pérez-Urdiales, and K. A. Schwabe. 2017. Building drought resilience in California’s cities and suburbs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Mount, J., et al. 2016. California’s water: Managing droughts. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Rougoor, C. W., G. Trip, R. B. Huirne, and J. A. Renkema. 1998. “How to define and study farmers’ management capacity: Theory and use in agricultural economics.” Agric. Econ. 18 (3): 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00021-8.
Sebri, M. 2014. “A meta-analysis of residential water demand studies.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 16 (3): 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9490-9.
Simar, L., and P. W. Wilson. 2009. “Inferences from cross-sectional, stochastic frontier models.” Econom. Rev. 29 (1): 62–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930903324523.
Spinoni, J., G. Naumann, H. Carrao, P. Barbosa, and J. Vogt. 2014. “World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951–2010.” Int. J. Climatol. 34 (8): 2792–2804. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3875.
Stevens, M., and R. Lin. 2016. “Targeted over a rate hike, Yorba Linda water board incumbents likely to be recalled from office.” LA Times. August 16, 2018.
Waldman, D. M. 1982. “A stationary point for the stochastic frontier likelihood.” J. Econom. 18 (2): 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90041-0.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 146Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Oct 22, 2018
Accepted: Aug 14, 2019
Published online: Feb 20, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 20, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Scholar, School of Public Policy, Univ. of California, Riverside, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-8020. Email: [email protected]
Kenneth A. Baerenklau [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Public Policy, Univ. of California, Riverside, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share