Technical Papers
May 11, 2018

Willingness to Pay for Perceived Increased Costs of Water and Wastewater Service in Shrinking US Cities: A Latent Class Approach

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144, Issue 7

Abstract

Chronic population decline in cities nationwide has resulted in increased per capita costs for continued service of water and wastewater infrastructure. Due to the high fixed costs associated with water and wastewater infrastructures and this chronic population decline, the financial burden to maintain and operate the fixed-grid footprint has become a challenge for those who reside within these shrinking cities. With this in mind, the understanding of public opinion toward the provision of service provided by critical infrastructure sectors is crucial for informed decision making by both utilities and state agencies. Hence, this study seeks to present a new methodological approach to assess the willingness to pay for the provision of water and wastewater services, and to evaluate the drivers of the willingness to pay in shrinking cities. A latent class Tobit regression modeling approach is proposed to identify and understand the influential variables associated with a stated preference survey on the willingness to pay for increased rates in shrinking cities. In addition, the modeling approach can more accurately capture the unobserved heterogeneity across the nationwide shrinking cities. The results illustrated that the latent class Tobit outperformed the more basic Tobit model and accounted for unobserved heterogeneity. Moreover, characteristics determining an increased willingness to pay for improved reliability of water and wastewater service included the responsibility of paying the water bill, homeownership, and income level. Characteristics determining a decreased willingness to pay for improved reliability of water and wastewater service included gender, awareness of chronic population decline, having no income, marital status, and employment status.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abramson, A., N. Becker, Y. Garb, and N. Lazarovitch. 2011. “Willingness to pay, borrow, and work for rural water service improvements in developing countries.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (11): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010147.
Alcubilla, R. G., and J. R. Lund. 2006. “Derived willingness-to-pay for household water use with price and probabilistic supply.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (6): 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:6(424).
Bright, E. M. 2000. Reviving America’s forgotten neighborhoods: An investigation of inner city revitalization efforts. New York: Garland Publishing.
Brown, S., W. H. Greene, M. N. Harris, and K. Taylor. 2015. “An inverse hyperbolic sine heteroskedastic latent class panel tobit model: An application to modelling charitable donations.” Econ. Modell. 50: 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.06.018.
Burstein, P. 2003. “The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda.” Political Res. Q. 56 (1): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103.
Butts, R., and S. Gasteyer. 2011. “More cost per drop: Water rates, structural inequality, and race in the United States—The case of Michigan.” Environ. Pract. 13 (4): 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046611000391.
Castro, A. J., C. C. Vaughn, M. García-Llorente, J. P. Julian, and C. L. Atkinson. 2016. “Willingness to pay for ecosystem services among stakeholder groups in a south-central US watershed with regional conflict.” J. Water Res. Plann. Manage. 142 (9): 05016006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000671.
Dziegielewska, D. A., and R. Mendelsohn. 2007. “Does ‘no’ mean ‘no’? A protest methodology.” Environ. Resour. Econ., 38 (1): 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9057-4.
Faust, K. M., D. M. Abraham, and S. McElmurry. 2016a. “Sustainability of water and wastewater infrastructure in shrinking cities.” J. Public Works Manage. Policy 21 (2): 128–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X15606737.
Faust, K. M., F. Mannering, and D. Abraham. 2016b. “Statistical analysis of public perceptions of water infrastructure sustainability in shrinking cities.” Urban Water J. 13 (6): 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1011671.
Genius, M., E. Hatzaki, E. M. Kouromichelaki, G. Kouvakis, S. Nikiforaki, and K. P. Tsagarakis. 2008. “Evaluating consumers’ willingness to pay for improved potable water quality and quantity.” Water Resour. Manage. 22 (12): 1825–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9255-7.
Gray, V., D. Lowery, M. Fellowes, and A. McAtee. 2004. “Public opinion, public policy, and organized interests in the American states.” Political Res. Q. 57 (3): 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700306.
Greenberg, M., and D. Schneider. 1996. Environmentally devastated neighborhoods: Perceptions, policies, and realities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Greene, W. H. 2012. Econometric modeling guide. 10th ed. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software.
Halstead, J. M., A. E. Luloff, and T. H. Stevens. 1992. “Protest bidders in contingent valuation.” Northeastern J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 21 (2): 160–169.
Hensher, D., N. Shore, and K. Train. 2005. “Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 32 (4): 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-7686-7.
Hensher, D., N. Shore, and K. Train. 2006. “Water supply security and willingness to pay to avoid drought restrictions.” Econ. Rec. 82 (256): 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00293.
Hollander, J. B. 2010. “Moving toward a shrinking cities metric: Analyzing land use changes associated with depopulation in Flint, Michigan.” Cityscape 12 (1): 133–151. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1585405.
Hollander, J. B. 2011. “Can a city successfully shrink? Evidence from survey data on neighborhood quality.” Urban Affairs Rev. 47 (1): 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410379099.
Jordan, J. L., and A. H. Enlnagheeb. 1993. “Willingness to pay for improvements in air quality.” Water Resour. Res. 29 (2): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02420.
Jorgensen, B. S., G. Syme, B. Bishop, and B. Nancarrow. 1999. “Protest responses in contingent valuation.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 14 (1): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008372522243.
Loomis, J. 2011. “What’s to know about hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation studies?” J. Econ. Surv. 25 (2): 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00675.
Mannering, F. L., V. Shankar, and C. R. Bhat. 2016. “Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 11: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001.
Martinez-Fernandez, C., and C. Wu. 2009 “Shrinking cities: A global overview and concerns about Australian mining cities cases.” In The future of shrinking cities: Problems, patterns and strategies of urban transformation in a global context, edited by K. Pallagst, et al. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Univ. of California.
McGuirk, A. M., K. Stephenson, and D. B. Taylor. 1989. The use of Tobit analysis in the valuation of nonmarket resources. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ.
Merrett, S. 2002. “Deconstructing households’ willingness-to-pay for water in low-income countries.” Water Policy 4 (2): 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00002-8.
Pallagst, K. 2008. “Shrinking cities: Planning challenges from an international perspective.” In Cities growing smaller, edited by S. Rugare and T. Schwarz, 17–31. Cleveland, OH: Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative, College of Architecture and Environmental Design, Kent State Univ.
Raje, D. V., P. S. Dhobe, and A. W. Deshpande. 2002. “Consumer’s willingness to pay more for municipal supplied water: A case study.” Ecol. Econ. 42 (3): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00054-X.
Randall, A. 1986. “The possibility of satisfactory benefit estimation with contingent markets.” In Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method, edited by R. G. Cummings, D. S. Brookshire, and W. D. Schulze. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
Rybczynski, W., and P. Linneman. 1999. “How to save our shrinking cities.” Public Interest 135: 30–44.
Soroka, S. N., and C. Wlezien. 2004. “Opinion representation and policy feedback: Canada in comparative perspective.” Can. J. Political Sci. 37 (3): 531–559.
Strazzera, E., M. Genius, R. Scarpa, and G. Hutchinson. 2003. “The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 25 (4): 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025098431440.
Tentes, G., and D. Damigos. 2014. “Discrete choice experiment for groundwater valuation: Case of the Asopos River Basin, Greece.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (7): 04014089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000481.
Tobin, J. 1958. “Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables.” Econometrica 26 (1): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382.
US Census Bureau. 2016. “Population.” Accessed January 15, 2016. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217.
Veronesi, M., F. Chawla, M. Maurer, and J. Lienert. 2014. “Climate change and the willingness to pay to reduce ecological and health risks from wastewater flooding in urban centers and the environment.” Ecol. Econ. 98: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.005.
Wang, H., J. Xie, and H. Li. 2010. “Water pricing with household surveys: A study of acceptability and willingness to pay in Chongqing, China.” China Econ. Rev. 21 (1): 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2009.12.001.
Wang, W., K. Parker, and P. Taylor. 2013. “Breadwinner moms: Mothers are the sole or primary provider in four-in-ten households with children; public conflicted about the growing trend.” Accessed January 15, 2016. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/29/breadwinner-moms/.
Washington, S. P., M. G. Karlaftis, and F. L. Mannering. 2010. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Whittington, D., J. Briscoe, X. Mu, and W. Barron. 1990. “Estimating the willingness to pay for water services in developing countries: A case study of the use of contingent valuation surveys in southern Haiti.” Econ. Dev. Cultural Change 38 (2): 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1086/451794.
Willis, K. G., R. Scarpa, and M. Acutt. 2005. “Assessing water company customer preferences and willingness to pay for service improvements: A stated choice analysis.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003277.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144Issue 7July 2018

History

Received: Jun 28, 2017
Accepted: Jan 16, 2018
Published online: May 11, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton C1752, Austin, TX 78712 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-4757. Email: [email protected]
Salvador Hernandez, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. Email: [email protected]
Jason Anderson [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share