Multiobjective Functions to Identify the High-Power-Density Stream Reaches in Hydropower Resource Assessment
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144, Issue 3
Abstract
A hydropower resource assessment (HRA) can be considered a reconnaissance survey in which the total hydropower potential in a region is quantified. Hydropower potential for purposes of this paper is defined as the potential power that can be extracted from a reservoir. A product of mean annual streamflow flowing in a stream reach and the hydraulic head in a potential reservoir to be constructed in the stream reach with turbine efficiency and unit weight of water determines the power potential. Traditionally, an HRA considered only hydrologic and hydraulic information to quantify the total hydropower potential in a region. With the advancements in computational technology, the HRA can be enriched with geospatial environmental information. This additional information can help to identify the potential stream reaches and their rank for future hydropower development in a region. This paper considers three different types of information, and hence, three criteria, including (1) hydrologic and hydraulic information; (2) environmental information; and (3) combined hydrologic and hydraulic and environmental information to search for potential stream reaches. A methodology was proposed to identify the high-power-density sites for potential development using these three criteria. The methodology was tested to a USGS subbasin in the state of California. The impacts of the criteria on potential site identification are clearly observed in the results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Wind and Water Power Technologies Program. Support from California State University, Fresno, is also acknowledged.
Disclaimer
This manuscript has been coauthored by employees of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. DOE. The U.S. Government retains, and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains, a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. The DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).
References
Anderson, E. P., Freeman, M. C., and Pringle, C. M. (2006). “Ecological consequences of hydropower development in Central America: Impacts of small dams and water diversion on neotropical stream fish assemblages.” River Res. Appl., 22(4), 397–411.
Bohlen, C., and Lewis, L. Y. (2009). “Examining the economic impacts of hydropower dams on property values using GIS.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(Jul), S258–S269.
Burke, M., Jorde, K., and Buffington, J. M. (2009). “Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operations: Changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(Jul), S224–S236.
Carlisle, D. M., Wolock, D. M., and Meador, M. R. (2011). “Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: A multiregional assessment.” Front. Ecol. Environ., 9(5), 264–270.
Carroll, G., Reeves, K., Lee, R., and Cherry, S. (2004). “Evaluation of potential hydropower sites throughout the United States.” Proc., 24th Annual ESRI Int. User Conf., Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., San Diego.
Church Ciocci, L., Suloway, J., and Brown, S. R. (2003). “Hydropower research and development recommendations.” J. Energy Eng., 33–41.
Conner, A., and Francfort, J. (1999). “Hydropower resource assessment modeling results.” Waterpower ‘99, Lockheed Martin, 1–10.
Graf, W. L. (1999). “Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts.” Water Resour. Res., 35(4), 1305–1311.
Gregory, S., Li, H., and Li, J. (2002). “The conceptual basis for ecological responses to dam removal.” BioScience, 52(8), 713–723.
Guo, L., Xia, Z., Yu, L., Yu, W., Su, L., and Ma, X. (2013). “Ecological significance of instream hydrological statistical parameters.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1088–1097.
Hadjerioua, B., et al. (2013). An assessment of energy potential from new stream-reach development in the United States, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Hall, D. G., et al. (2004). “Water energy resources of the United States with emphasis on low head/low power resources.”, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID.
Hall, D. G., and Lee, R. D. (2014). “Assessment of opportunities for new United States pumped storage hydroelectric plants using existing water features as auxiliary reservoirs.”, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID.
Hall, D. G., Reeves, K. S., Brizzee, J., Lee, R. D., Carrol, G. R., and Sommers, G. L. (2006). “Feasibility assessment of the water resources of the United States for new low power and small hydro classes of hydroelectric plants.”, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID.
Kao, S.-C., et al. (2014). “New stream-reach development: A comprehensive assessment of hydropower energy potential in the United States.”, Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC.
Kondolf, G. M. (1997). “Hungry water: Effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels.” Environ. Manage., 21(4), 533–551.
Lian, Y., You, J.-Y., Sparks, R., and Demissie, M. (2012). “Impact of human activities to hydrologic alteration on the Illinois river.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 537–546.
Manyari, W. V., and Abilio de Carvalho, J. O. (2007). “Environmental considerations in energy planning for the Amazon region: Downstream effects of dams.” Energy Policy, 35(12), 6526–6534.
Mathews, R., and Richter, B. D. (2007). “Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(6), 1400–1413.
Pasha, M. F. K., Yang, M., Yeasmin, D., Saetern, S., Kao, S., and Smith, B. T. (2016a). “Identifying high power–density stream reaches through refined geospatial resolution in hydropower resource assessment.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 06016001.
Pasha, M. F. K., Yeasmin, D., Kao, S., Hadjerioua, B., Wei, Y., and Smith, B. T. (2014). “Stream-reach identification for new run-of-river hydropower development through a merit matrix-based geospatial algorithm.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014016.
Pasha, M. F. K., Yeasmin, D., Saetern, S., Yang, M., Kao, S., and Smith, B. T. (2016b). “Uncertainty analysis in geospatial merit matrix-based hydropower resource assessment.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04016020.
Poff, N. L., et al. (2010). “The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards.” Freshwater Biol., 55(1), 147–170.
Ritcher, B. D., Bumgartner, J. V., Wigington, R., and Braun, D. P. (1997). “How much water does a river need?” Freshwater Biol., 37(1), 231–249.
Rosenberg, D. M., McCully, P., and Pringle, C. M. (2000). “Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alterations: Introduction.” BioScience, 50(9), 746–751.
Shuman, J. R. (1995). “Environmental considerations for assessing dam removal alternatives for river restoration.” Regulated Rivers Res. Manage., 11(3–4), 249–261.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). (1983). “National hydroelectric power resources study.”, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). (2013). “Hydropower resource assessment at non powered USACE sites.” ⟨http://cdm16021.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p266001coll1/id/2333⟩ (May 30, 2014).
USBR (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation). (2011). Hydropower resource assessment at existing reclamation facilities, Denver.
USEIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2014). “Short-term energy outlook.” ⟨http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/pdf/steo_full.pdf⟩ (May 29, 2014).
USGS. (2017a). “Hydrography—National hydrography dataset.” ⟨https://nhd.usgs.gov/⟩ (Nov. 15, 2017).
USGS. (2017b). “National elevation dataset (NED).” ⟨https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/NED⟩ (Nov. 15, 2017).
U.S. Water Resources Council. (1983). “Economic and environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies.” ⟨https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/technical/econ/⟩ (Jun. 1, 2017).
Verdin, K. L., and Jenson, S. K. (1996). “Development of continental scale digital elevation models and extraction of hydrographic features.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf./Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144 • Issue 3 • March 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 26, 2016
Accepted: Sep 1, 2017
Published online: Jan 5, 2018
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.