Case Studies
Dec 20, 2017

Performance and Cost Analysis of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Plants in Northern India: Case Study

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144, Issue 3

Abstract

In this study, a techno-economic analysis of 16 decentralized wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) based on various technologies was performed in northern India. Six elements including treatment performance, land use, capital investment, operation and maintenance, cost of treatment, and electricity consumption are discussed in this study. The technologies assessed are extended aeration (EA), moving bed bioreactor (MBBR), sequential bioreactor (SBR), rotating biological contactor (RBC), on-site package (aerobic and/or anaerobic), and membrane bioreactor (MBR). The results indicate that the treatment efficiencies of all cluster-type WWTPs differed significantly from on-site anaerobic package (AnP) types. On the other hand, the treatment efficiencies of on-site aerobic package (AP) systems were reasonably comparable to those of cluster-type plants. The land use for on-site package treatment systems was estimated between 0.125 and 0.8  m2 per population equivalent (pe) and higher than for cluster-type WWTPs, which require between 0.039 and 0.159  m2/pe. The data collected from this study show that package plant treatment costs are high compared with those of cluster types, ranging from US$0.0676 to 0.1045 (±10%) and from US$0.0353 to 0.1891/m3 (±1520%), respectively. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) was undertaken for all the WWTPs and among the considered environmental benefits nitrogen removal contributed to the most. Moreover, the operation of WWTPs was found to be economically viable even without the sale of treated water, except for one AnP plant. For all plants evaluated, specific power consumption (SPC) was found to vary between 0 and 1  kW/m3.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The European Commission, within the 7th framework program, under Grant No. 308672 and the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, are acknowledged for their support to this study.

References

Allison, L., and Kaminsky, J. (2016). “Onsite wastewater treatment management systems.” Construction Research Congress 2016, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1577–1587.
APHA (American Public Health Association). (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st Ed., Washington, DC.
Balkema, A. J., Preisig, H., Otterpohl, R., and Lambert, F. J. (2002). “Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems.” Urban Water, 4(2), 153–161.
Banyal, P., Singh, N., and Kazmi, A. A. (2015). “Assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment systems for sanitation of small communities using a qualitative approach methodology: A case study from Northern India.” Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., 4(4), 32–39.
Bhoye, V. Y., Saner, A. B., and Aher, P. D. (2016). “Life cycle cost analysis of sewage treatment plants.” Int. J. Mod. Trends Eng. Res., 3(4), 426–429.
Brown, F. (1991). “Small is beautiful.” Space Policy, 7(2), 165–167.
Butler, R., and MacCormick, T. (1996). “Opportunities for decentralized treatment, sewer mining and effluent re-use.” Desalination, 106(1–3), 273–283.
CPHEEO (Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation). (2015). Manual on water supply and treatment, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Diaz, J., and Barkdoll, B. (2006). “Comparison of wastewater treatment in developed and developing countries.” World Environmental and Water Resource Congress 2006: Examining the Confluence of Environmental and Water Concerns, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Donovan, D. J., Katzer, T., Brothers, K., Cole, E., and Johnson, M. (2002). “Cost-benefit analysis of artificial recharge in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 356–365.
Engin, G. O., and Demir, I. (2006). “Cost analysis of alternative methods for wastewater handling in small communities.” J. Environ. Manage., 79(4), 357–363.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A., and Yaisawarng, S. (1993). “Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: A distance function approach.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 75(2), 374–380.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Weber, W. (2016). “Shadow prices of Missouri public conservation land.” Public Finance Rev., 29(6), 444–460.
Flores-Alsina, X., Gallego, A., Feijoo, G., and Rodriguez-Roda, I. (2010). “Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives.” J. Environ. Manage., 91(5), 1193–1201.
Gallego, A., Hospido, A., Moreira, M. T., and Feijoo, G. (2008). “Environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants for small populations.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 52(6), 931–940.
Gani, K. M., Ali, M., Rajpal, A., Jaiswal, H., and Kazmi, A. A. (2016). “Sewage treatment efficacy and heavy metal removal in moving bed biofilm based treatment plants of Northern India.” J. Water. Sanitation Hyg. Dev., 6(1), 115–120.
Gani, K. M., and Kazmi, A. A. (2016). “Evaluation of three full scale sewage treatment plants for occurrence and removal efficacy of priority phthalates.” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 4(3), 2628–2636.
Godfrey, S., Labhasetwar, P., and Wate, S. (2009). “Greywater reuse in residential schools in Madhya Pradesh, India—A case study of cost–benefit analysis.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 53(5), 287–293.
Guerrini, A., Romano, G., Leardini, C., and Martini, M. (2015). “Measuring the efficiency of wastewater services through data envelopment analysis.” Water Sci. Technol., 71(12), 1845–1851.
Hamouda, M., Anderson, W. B., and Huck, P. M. (2009). “Decision support systems in water and wastewater treatment process selection and design: A review.” Water Sci. Technol., 60(7), 1757–1770.
Hernández-Sancho, F., Molinos-Senante, M., and Sala-Garrido, R. (2010). “Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: An empirical approach for Spain.” Sci. Total Environ., 408(4), 953–957.
Hernández-Sancho, F., Molinos-Senante, M., and Sala-Garrido, R. (2011). “Cost modelling for wastewater treatment processes.” Desalination, 268(1–3), 1–5.
Hingorani, P. (2011). “The economics of municipal sewage water recycling and reuse in India.” Chapter 21, India infrastructure report-2011: Water: Policy and performance for sustainable development, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India.
Jamwal, P., Mittal, A. K., and Mouchel, J.-M. (2009). “Efficiency evaluation of sewage treatment plants with different technologies in Delhi (India).” Environ. Monit. Assess., 153(1–4), 293–305.
Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., and Asolekar, S. R. (2012). “Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach.” J. Environ. Manage., 113, 158–169.
Kazmi, A. A., Tyagi, V. K., Trivedi, R. C., and Kumar, A. (2008). “Coliforms removal in full-scale activated sludge plants in India.” J. Environ. Manage., 87(3), 415–419.
Libralato, G., Volpi Ghirardini, A., and Avezzù, F. (2012). “To centralise or to decentralise: An overview of the most recent trends in wastewater treatment management.” J. Environ. Manage., 94(1), 61–68.
Lund, J. R. (1992). “Benefit-cost ratios: Failures and alternatives.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 94–100.
Lundin, M., and Morrison, G. M. (2002). “A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems.” Urban Water, 4(2), 145–152.
Massoud, M., Tarhini, A., and Nasr, J. (2009). “Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: Applicability in developing countries.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(1), 652–659.
Mburu, N., Tebitendwa, S. M., van Bruggen, J. J., Rousseau, D. P. L., and Lens, P. N. L. (2013). “Performance comparison and economics analysis of waste stabilization ponds and horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater: A case study of the Juja sewage treatment works.” J. Environ. Manage., 128, 220–225.
Metcalf & Eddy, Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., and Stensel, H. D. (2003). Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Molinos-Senante, M., Garrido-Baserba, M., Reif, R., Hernández-Sancho, F., and Poch, M. (2012). “Assessment of wastewater treatment plant design for small communities: Environmental and economic aspects.” Sci. Total Environ., 427–428, 11–18.
Molinos-Senante, M., Gómez, T., and Garrido-Baserba, M. (2014). “Assessing the sustainability of small wastewater treatment systems: A composite indicator approach.” Sci. Total Environ., 497–498, 607–617.
Molinos-Senante, M., Hernández-Sancho, F., and Sala-Garrido, R. (2010). “Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: A cost-benefit analysis.” Sci. Total Environ., 408(20), 4396–4402.
Moller, K., Fryd, O., De Neergaard, A., and Magid, J. (2012). “Economic, environmental and socio-cultural sustainability of three constructed wetlands in Thailand.” Environ. Urban., 24(1), 305–323.
Muga, H. E., and Mihelcic, J. R. (2008). “Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies.” J. Environ. Manage., 88(3), 437–447.
NWS (Navyaa Watertech Solutions). (2016). “Sintex sewage treatment plant.” ⟨http://www.navyaawatertechsolutions.com/sewage%20_treatment_plant.html⟩ (Nov. 6, 2016).
Palme, U., Lundin, M., Tillman, A. M., and Molander, S. (2005). “Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems: Researchers and indicator users in a co-operative case study.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 43(3), 293–311.
Paraskevas, P., Glokas, D. L., and Lekkas, T. D. (2002). “Wastewater management in coastal urban areas: The case of Greece.” Water Sci. Technol., 46(8), 177–186.
Patel, U. D., and Tandel, D. V. (2016). “Comparative evaluation of low-cost, self-sustainable sewage treatment reactors for the non-potable reuse of treated effluent.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2016, ASCE, Reston, VA, 215–223.
Pinkham, R., et al. (2004). Valuing decentralized wastewater technologies: A catalog of benefits, costs, and economic analysis techniques, Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, CO.
Poch, M., Comas, J., Rodríguez-Roda, I., Sànchez-Marrè, M., and Cortés, U. (2004). “Designing and building real environmental decision support systems.” Environ. Model. Software, 19(9), 857–873.
Rodriguez-Garcia, G., Molinos-Senante, M., Hospido, A., Hernández-Sancho, F., Moreira, M. T., and Feijoo, G. (2011). “Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants.” Water Res., 45(18), 5997–6010.
Rousseau, D. P. L., Lesage, E., Story, A., Vanrolleghem, P. A., and De Pauw, N. (2008). “Constructed wetlands for water reclamation.” Desalination, 218(1–3), 181–189.
Sala-Garrido, R., Hernández-Sancho, F., and Molinos-Senante, M. (2012). “Assessing the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in an uncertain context: A DEA with tolerances approach.” Environ. Sci. Policy, 18, 34–44.
Sato, N., Okubo, T., Onodera, T., Agrawal, L. K., Ohashi, A., and Harada, H. (2007). “Economic evaluation of sewage treatment processes in India.” J. Environ. Manage., 84(4), 447–460.
Shabman, L., and Stephenson, K. (2000). “Environmental valuation and its economic critics.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 382–3888.
Sharma, M. K., and Kazmi, A. A. (2016). “Performance evaluation of package plant for treatment of single household domestic wastewater.” Water Pract. Technol., 11(1), 1–9.
Sharma, M. K., Khursheed, A., and Kamzi, A. A. (2014). “Modified septic tank-anaerobic filter unit as a two-stage onsite domestic wastewater treatment system.” Environ. Technol., 35(17), 2183–2193.
Singh, N. K., Banyal, P., and Kazmi, A. A. (2016). “Techno-economic assessment of full scale MBBRs treating municipal wastewater followed by different tertiary treatment strategies: A case study from India.” Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol., 15(4), 1311–1316.
Singh, N. K., Kazmi, A. A., and Starkl, M. (2015). “A review on full-scale decentralized wastewater treatment systems: Techno-economical approach.” Water. Sci. Technol., 71(4), 468–478.
Suneethi, S., et al. (2015). “Qualitative evaluation of small scale municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in South India.” Water Pract. Technol., 10(4), 711–719.
Tecle, A., Fogel, M., and Duckstein, L. (1988). “Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 383–398.
Tsagarakis, K. P., Mara, D. D., and Angelakis, A. N. (2003). “Application of cost criteria for selection of municipal wastewater treatment systems.” Water. Air. Soil Pollut., 142(1–4), 187–210.
Tung, Y. K. (1992). “Probability distribution for benefit/cost ratio and net benefit.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 133–150.
Venkatesh, G., and Brattebø, H. (2013). “Typifying cities to streamline the selection of relevant environmental sustainability indicators for urban water supply and sewage handling systems: A recommendation.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability., 15(3), 765–782.
Von Sperling, M. (1996). “Comparison among the most frequently used systems for wastewater treatment in developing countries.” Water Sci. Technol., 33(3), 59–72.
Wicklein, R. C. (1998). “Designing for appropriate technology in developing countries.” Technol. Soc., 20(3), 371–375.
Wikramanayake, N., and Corea, E. J. H. (2003). “Alternative technology for urban wastewater treatment: Case studies and issues of implementation and sustainability.” World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–15.
Wilderer, P., and Shereff, D. (2000). “Decentralised and centralised wastewater management: A challenge for technology developers.” Water Sci. Technol., 41(1), 1–8.
Wong, J. W. C., Kurade, M. B., and Show, K. Y. (2016). “On-site treatment systems: Biological treatment and nutrient removal.” Chapter 11, Green technologies for sustainable water management, ASCE, Reston, VA, 375–418.
Woods, G. J., et al. (2012). “Centralized versus decentralized wastewater reclamation in the Houghton area of Tucson, Arizona.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 313–324.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144Issue 3March 2018

History

Received: Nov 17, 2016
Accepted: Aug 8, 2017
Published online: Dec 20, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 20, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nitin Kumar Singh, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Scholar, Environmental Engineering Group, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Absar Ahmad Kazmi [email protected]
Professor, Environmental Engineering Group, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share