Technical Papers
May 30, 2017

Application of Dynamic Simulation Modeling Approach and Load-Resistance Concept to Water–Infrastructure Interactions in Coastal Areas

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 143, Issue 8

Abstract

Climate variability and expansion of communities and their infrastructure have increased vulnerability of coastal regions to flood. Flooding can cause failure of infrastructure, which could result in seriously interrupting or even paralyzing the daily life in those communities. Manhattan in New York City is a coastal metropolitan area surrounded by several waterbodies. Interactions among these waterbodies at the time of flooding significantly affect the water level fluctuation. Devastation caused by Superstorm Sandy in October 2012 is evidence of how interconnected NYC waterbodies amplified the adverse effects on the shoreline and the coastal system. Proposing models to study the coastal areas where there are interactions among waterbodies that affect water level variations, and results in infrastructure vulnerability to flooding, is a challenge. In response to this challenge, the main objectives of this study are to simulate water-level variation in the New York Bay (lower Manhattan) during storm events, and to investigate the effect of storms on coastal infrastructure. For this purpose, by using the concept of system dynamics (SD), a dynamic simulation model (DSM) has been formulated to model the interactions among the water entities of the system for normal water level (harmonic tide) simulation. In the DSM framework, the governing equations among different waterbodies are used based on flood (forward) and ebb (backward) effects in each tidal cycle. The simulated water level by DSM is then fine-tuned using an artificial neural network (ANN) model, providing a better match between simulation results and the observed values. An envelope graph is then developed to simulate surge elevation at the time of storm in a representative station (Battery Park south of lower Manhattan). A load-resistance concept has been developed to investigate the effect of flood (storm) as load on the infrastructure resistance. Then, the probability of coastal infrastructure failure to flood load is determined. Results show the significant value of using a coupled SD-ANN platform to simulate water-level fluctuations at the time of storm. The developed load-resistance concept is a framework to link the simulated storm (load) to the resistance of lifelines (infrastructure) of coastal communities. This study targeted two important growing concerns in the coastal communities that can be further integrated, replicated, and extended in this and other similar settings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ahmad, S., and Simonovic, S. P. (2000). “System dynamics modeling of reservoir operations for flood management.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 190–198.
Alemu, E. T., Palmer, R. N., Polebitski, A., and Meaker, B. (2011). “Decision support system for optimizing reservoir operations using ensemble streamflow predictions.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 72–82.
Beardsley, R. C., Chapman, D. C., Brink, K. H., Ramp, S. R., and Schlitz, R. (1985). “The Nantucket shoals flux experiment (NSFE79). Part I: A basic description of the current and temperature variability.” J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15(6), 713–748.
Blumberg, A. F., Khan, L. A, and John, P. St. (1999). “Three-dimensional hydrodynamic model of New York harbor region.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 799–816.
Box, M. J. (1965). “A new method of constrained optimization and a comparison with other methods.” Comput. J., 8(1), 42–52.
Brown, W. S., Pettigrew, N. R., and Irish, J. D. (1985). “The Nantucket shoals flux experiment (NSFE79). Part II: The structure and variability of across-shelf pressure gradients.” J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15(6), 749–771.
Chaloulakou, A., Saisana, M., and Spyrellis, N. (2003). “Comparative assessment of neural networks and regression models for forecasting summertime ozone in Athens.” Sci. Total Environ., 313(1), 1–13.
Chapman, D. C., Barth, J. A., Beardsley, R. C., and Fairbanks, R. G. (1986). “On the continuity of mean flow between the Scotian shelf and the Middle Atlantic Bight.” J. Phys. Oceanogr., 16(4), 758–772.
Chung, G., et al. (2008). “A general water supply planning model: Evaluation of decentralized treatment.” Environ. Modell. Software, 23(7), 893–905.
Crossett, K. M. (2005). “Population trends along the coastal United States: 1980–2008.” Government Printing Office, U.S. Dept. of Commerce and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA’s National Ocean Service, Management and Budget Office, Special Projects, Silver Spring, MD.
Downer, C. W., and Ogden, F. L. (2004). “GSSHA: Model to simulate diverse stream flow producing processes.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 161–174.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). “New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program.”, Washington, DC.
Forrester, J. W. (1990). Principles of systems, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.
Gao, Y., and Liu, C. (1997). “Research on simulated optimal decision making for a regional water resources system.” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 13(1), 123–134.
Gardner, M. W., and Dorling, S. R. (2000). “Statistical surface ozone models: an improved methodology to account for non-linear behaviour.” Atmos. Environ., 34(1), 21–34.
Geyer, W. R., and Chant, R. (2006). The physical oceanography processes in the Hudson River estuary, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Guo, H. C., Liu, L., Huang, G. H., Fuller, G. A., Zou, R., and Yin, Y. Y. (2001). “A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: A study for the Lake Erhai Basin.” J. Environ. Manage., 61(1), 93–111.
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open channel hydraulics, Macmillan, New York.
Karamouz, M., Razmi, A., Nazif, S., and Zahmatkesh, Z. (2017). “Integration of Inland and Coastal Storms for Flood Hazard Assessment Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model.” Environmental Earth Sciences, in press.
Karamouz, M., Zahraie, B., Araghi Nejhad, S., Shahsavari, M., and Torabi, S. (2001). “An integrated approach to water resources development of the Tehran region in Iran.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 37(5), 1301–1311.
Kortenhaus, A. (2003). “Probabilistische Methoden für Nordseedeiche.” Ph.D. thesis, Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen, Leichtweiß-Institut für Wasserbau, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Kortright, E. (1997). “Modeling and simulation with UML and JAVA.” Proc., 30th Annual Simulation Symp., IEEE, New York, 43–48.
Minsker, B., et al. (2015). “Progress and recommendations for advancing performance-based sustainable and resilient infrastructure design.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., A4015006.
Mirchi, A., et al. (2012). “Synthesis of system dynamics tools for holistic conceptualization of water resources problems.” Water Resour. Manage., 26(9), 2421–2442.
Oey, L. Y., Mellor, G. L., and Hires, R. I. (1985). “Tidal modeling of the Hudson-Raritan estuary.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 20(5), 511–527.
Panico, A., Lanzanoa, G., and Salzanoc, E. (2013). “Seismic vulnerability of wastewater treatment plants.” Chem. Eng. Trans., 32, 13–18.
Parsons, H. (1913). “Tidal phenomena in New York harbor.” Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA.
Porse, E., and Lund, J. (2015). “Network analysis and visualizations of water resources infrastructure in California: Linking connectivity and resilience.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04015041.
Raczynski, S. (1990). “Pasion: Object-oriented simulation on the PC.” Proc., Int. Systems Dynamics Society, System Dynamics Society, Chestnut Hill, MA.
Scheffner, N. W., Vermulakonda, S. R., Mark, D. J., Butler, H. L., and Kim, K. W. (1994). “New York bight study. Report 1: Hydrodynamic modeling.”, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
Simonovic, S. P. (2009). Water resources: Methods and tools for a systems approach, Earthscan, London.
Simonovic, S. P. (2011). Systems approach to management of disasters: Methods and applications, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Simonovic, S. P. (2012). Managing water resources: Methods and tools for a systems approach, Routledge, Abingdon, U.K.
Simonovic, S. P., and Fahmy, H. (1999). “A new modeling approach for water resources policy analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 295–304.
Sousa, S. I. V., Martins, F. G., Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M., and Pereira, M. C. (2007). “Multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks based on principal components to predict ozone concentrations.” Environ. Modell. Software, 22(1), 97–103.
Stave, K. A. (2003). “A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada.” J. Environ. Manage., 67(4), 303–313.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex World, McGraw Hill, New York.
Tidwell, V. C., Passell, H. D., Conrad, S. H., and Thomas, R. P. (2004). “System dynamics modeling for community-based water planning: Application to the Middle Rio Grande.” Aquat. Sci., 66(4), 357–372.
Traynham, L., Palmer, R., and Polebitski, A. (2011). “Impacts of future climate conditions and forecasted population growth on water supply systems in the Puget Sound Region.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 318–326.
Tung, Y. K., Yen, B. C., and Melching, C. S. (2006). “Hydrosystems engineering reliability assessment and risk analysis.” McGraw-Hill, New York, 495.
Vano, J. A., et al. (2010). “Climate change impacts on water management and irrigated agriculture in the Yakima River Basin, Washington, USA.” Clim. Change, 102(1–2), 287–317.
Willmott, C. J., et al. (1985). “Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 90(C5), 8995–9005.
Winz, I., Brierley, G., and Trowsdale, S. (2009). “The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management.” Water Resour. Manage., 23(7), 1301–1323.
Xu, Z. X., Takeuchi, K., Ishidaira, H., and Zhang, X. W. (2002). “Sustainability analysis for Yellow River water resources using the system dynamics approach.” Water Resour. Manage., 16(3), 239–261.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 143Issue 8August 2017

History

Received: May 20, 2016
Accepted: Feb 21, 2017
Published online: May 30, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Karamouz, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, 1417466191 Tehran, Iran (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Zahra Zahmatkesh [email protected]
Research Associate, Faculty of Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2. E-mail: [email protected]
Mohammad Ali Olyaei [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, 1417466191 Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share