Technical Papers
Mar 22, 2016

Lifecycle Assessment Analysis of Engineered Stormwater Control Methods Common to Urban Watersheds

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142, Issue 7

Abstract

Best management practice (BMP) selection typically focuses on economic costs and management criteria. Generally, there is very little consideration of lifecycle assessment (LCA)-determined environmental impacts (LCA impacts) associated with management practice implementation and operation, although the inclusion of LCA considerations are becoming increasingly common within state governments and industries as part of sustainability initiatives. LCA modeling provides an evaluation of the environmental impacts of a product or process in a cradle to grave scenario following ISO 140440 protocol. LCA can provide value in preliminary decision making for construction of sustainable stormwater management structures. To assist in that effort, the LCA impacts of typical upper Midwest U.S. urban stormwater management scenarios were evaluated. Primary, traditional structures (porous detention, sand filtration basins) were considered both as stand-alone systems and as systems coupled with green BMPs (rain gardens, vegetated swales, porous pavement). Designs were based on a Rapid City, South Dakota U.S. drainage basin configuration and national stormwater design manuals. Both midpoint and endpoint LCA impacts were determined based on a 30-year design life. The functional unit used was the volume of stormwater treated by the system for a design storm of 51 mm of rain in 24 h. LCA modeling results demonstrated that although implementation of green stormwater BMP offsets did effectively reduce LCA impacts compared with traditional management strategies, there was little difference between each of the green BMPs implemented. Transportation of management practice infrastructure was the greatest LCA-impact contributor, whereas the use of locally-sourced materials provided significant benefits to the impact categories examined.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part from a grant from USGS 104B Grant Program, South Dakota Water Research Institute.

References

Andrew, R., and Vesely, E. (2008). “Life-cycle energy and CO2 analysis of stormwater treatment devices.” Water Sci. Technol., 58(5), 985–993.
ARC (Auckland Regional Council). (2003). “Design guideline manual stormwater treatment devices.” Technical Publication 10, Auckland, New Zealand.
ARC (Auckland Regional Council). (2013). “Mulch specification for stormwater bioretention devices.”, Auckland, New Zealand.
AWA (Autrialian Water Association). (2000). National water quality management strategy: Australian guidelines for urban stormwater management, Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Brown, W., and Schueler, T. R. (1997). The economics of stormwater BMPs in the mid-Atlantic region: An examination of the real cost of providing storm water control, Center for Watershed Protection, Silver Spring, MD.
CNT (Center for Neighborhood Technology). (2010). The value of green infrastructure: A guide to recognizing its economic, environmental and social benefits, Chicago.
Cronshey, R. (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division, Washington, DC.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minami, C. (2001). “Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management.” Water Environ. Res., 73(1), 5–14.
Ellis, J. B., Deutsch, J.-C., Mouchel, J.-M., Scholes, L., and Revitt, M. (2004). “Multicriteria decision approaches to support sustainable drainage options for the treatment of highway and urban runoff.” Sci. Total Environ., 334, 251–260.
Flynn, K. M. (2011). “Evaluation of green infrastructure practices using life cycle assessment.” M.Sc. thesis, Villanova Univ., Villanova, PA.
Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., and Van Zelm, R. (2009). “ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level.” Ruimte en Milieu: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Hague, Netherlands.
Guo, J. C. Y., Ramaswami, A., and Kockman, S. M. (2010). “Sustainable design of urban porous landscape detention basin.” Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and the Urban Watersheds Research Institute, Denver.
Hoyer, J., Dickhaut, W., Kronawitter, L., and Weber, B. (2011). Water sensitive urban design principles and inspiration for sustainable stormwater management in the city of the future, HafenCity Univ., Hamburg, Germany.
Kirk, B. (2006). “Surburban stormwater management: An environmental life-cycle approach.” Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Li, H. (2015). “Green infrastructure for highway stormwater management: Field investigation for future design, maintenance, and management needs.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 05015001.
Martineau, G., and Samson, R. (2011). “Lifecycle assessment of the environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of urban heat island mitigation measures.” Institut National de Sante Publique du Québec Ouanos, Montréal.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2013a). “Annual precipitation amounts for Northeastern WY and Western SD.” National Weather Service (NWS) Forecast Office Rapid City, SD, 〈http://www.crh.noaa.gov〉 (Nov. 1, 2015).
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2013b). “Black Hills climate overview.” National Weather Service (NWS) Forecast Office Rapid City, SD, 〈http://www.weather.gov/unr/bhco〉 (Nov. 1, 2015).
NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). (2012). “U.S. life cycle inventory database.” 〈https://www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search〉 (Mar. 1, 2015).
NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation). (2010). New York State stormwater management design manual, Albany, NY.
Ramberg, J. D. (2007). “Stormwater mitigation: A case study on the use of porous pavements, filter cartridges, and retention ponds to mitigate stormwater runoff.” Thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
RC (Rapid City). (2009). City of Rapid City stormwater quality manual, Rapid City, SD.
Saygin, N., and Ulusoy, P. (2011). “Stormwater management and green infrastructure techniques for sustainable campus design.” Gazi Üniversitesi Politeknik Dergisi, 14(3), 223–231.
SimaPro version 7.3 [Computer software]. Pré Consultants, Netherlands.
Spatari, S., Yu, Z., and Montalto, F. A. (2011). “Life cycle implications of urban green infrastructure.” Environ. Pollut., 159(8–9), 2174–2179.
Strassler, E., Pritts, H., and Strellec, K. (2006). “Preliminary data summary of urban storm water best management practices.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Streutker, D. R. (2003). “Satellite-measured growth of the urban heat island of Houston, Texas.” Remote Sens. Environ., 85(3), 282–289.
USDA. (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” Technical Release-55, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services, Washington, DC.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2005). “Stormwater Phase II final rule fact sheet series.”, Washington, DC.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2007). “Reducing stormwater costs through low impact development (LID) strategies and practices.” EPA 841-F-07-006, Washington, DC.
Wang, T., Harvey, J., and Jones, D. (2010). “A framework for life-cycle cost analyses and environmental LCAs for fully permeable pavements.” Storm water program, division of environmental analysis, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
Wossink, G., and Hunt, B. (2003). The economics of structural stormwater BMPs in North Carolina, Water Resources Research Institute of the Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142Issue 7July 2016

History

Received: Jul 21, 2015
Accepted: Dec 16, 2015
Published online: Mar 22, 2016
Published in print: Jul 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 22, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tyler J. Hengen
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701.
Heidi L. Sieverding
Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701.
James J. Stone [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share