Technical Notes
Jun 9, 2015

Systematic Assessment of Water Sustainability at U.S. State and Region Scales

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 12

Abstract

Accurately conveying sustainability status and trends in a way that is understandable to broad audiences is a critical responsibility of state agencies. The difficulty in doing this lies in several important areas: stakeholder involvement, basis in science, selection of representative indicators, scoring relative to social priorities, recognition of uncertainty, and reporting in easily understood formats. The purpose of the study described here was development of a comprehensive system for measuring and reporting water sustainability at watershed, regional, and state scales. An analytical framework developed to quantify water system sustainability indicators for California was included in the California Water Plan Update 2013 and tested at multiple scales in multiple stakeholder settings. The novel scoring system compares measured condition against desired and undesired target conditions. Indicators were organized according to social goals and more conventional domains (e.g., water supply reliability). Uncertainty was represented as a combination of confidence in the strength of the indicator, natural variation, and measurement error. An online decision support tool was developed to contain an encyclopedia of more than 1,800 sustainability indicators and the results of their use at watershed, regional, and state scales as part of Water Plan Update 2013. The authors conclude that the indicators framework and the online decision support tool can be used in any comparable system in the world.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a contract (agreement # 4600007984) between the California Department of Water Resources and the University of California, Davis, and an agreement between the U.S. EPA and the California Department of Water Resources (agreement #X7-00T60401-0). The authors thank Vance Fong and Don Hodge of EPA Region 9 for their invaluable and thoughtful assistance. The authors also appreciate the assistance of Celeste Cantu, Jeff Beehler, Rick Whetzel, Peter Vitt, and Mark Norton of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority and Mike Antos, Nancy Steele, and Deborah Glaser of the Council for Watershed Health. Lara Lacher and Susana Cardenas at UC Davis deserve gratitude, as does Kamyar Guivetchi, chief of the Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management, California Department of Water Resources, for his consistent support and thoughtful guidance on the project.

References

Ahmadi, M., Arabi, M., Fontane, D. G., and Engel, B. A. (2015). “Application of multicriteria decision analysis with a priori knowledge to identify optimal nonpoint source pollution control plans.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014054.
ArcGIS 10.1 [Computer software]. Redlands, CA, Environmental Systems Research Institute.
ASCE Task Committee on Sustainability Criteria, Water Resources Planning and Management Division, and UNESCO/IHP IV Project M-4.3 Working Group. (1998). Sustainability criteria for water resource systems, Reston, VA.
Bellucci, C. (2007). “Stormwater and aquatic life: Making the connection between impervious cover and aquatic life impairments for TMDL development in Connecticut.” TMDL 2007, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA, 1003–1018.
Berryman, D., Bobee, B., Cluis, D., and Haemmerli, J. (1988). “Nonparametric tests for trend detection in water quality time series.” Water Resour. Bull., 24(3), 545–556.
Brown, K., Hall, W. L., Snook, M. H., and Garvin, K. (2010). Sustainable land development and restoration: Decision consequence analysis, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA, 528.
Christia, C., Giordani, G., and Papastergiadou, E. (2014). “Assessment of ecological quality of coastal lagoons with a combination of phytobenthic and water quality indices.” Mar. Pollut. Bull., 86(1–2), 411–423.
Ejeta, M. Z. (2013). “System stability in model complexity for integrated water management in California.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014024.
Esterby, S. R. (1996). “Review of methods for the detection and estimation of trends with emphasis on water quality applications.” Hydrol. Processes, 10(2), 127–149.
Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., Kim, C. H., de Sherbinin, A., Srebotnjak, T., and Mara, V. (2008). “2008 environmental performance index.” Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT.
Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Pfister, S., Yu, Y., and Sun, L. (2014). “Virtual scarce water in China.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 48(14), 7704–7713.
Fitzgerald, E. P., Bowden, W. B., Parker, S. P., and Kline, M. L. (2012). “Urban impacts on streams are scale-dependent with nonlinear influences on their physical and biotic recovery in Vermont, United States.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assn., 48(4), 679–697.
Fry, J., et al. (2011). “Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States.” PE&RS, 77(9), 858–864.
Hajkowicz, S., and Collins, K. (2007). “A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management.” Water Resour. Manage., 21(9), 1553–1566.
Harter, T., et al. (2012). “Addressing nitrate in California’s drinking water with a focus on Tulare Lake basin and Salinas Valley groundwater.”, Center for Watershed Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, 78.
Hirsch, R. M., and Slack, J. R. (1984). “A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence.” Water Resour. Res., 20(6), 727–732.
Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R., and Smith, R. A. (1982). “Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data.” Water Resour. Res., 18(1), 107–121.
Juwana, I., Muttil, N., and Perera, B. J. C. (2012). “Indicator-based water sustainability assessment—A review.” Sci. Total Environ., 438, 357–371.
Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, P. T. P., and Linkov, I. (2005). “Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making.” Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage., 1(2), 95–108.
Lancker, E., and Nijkamp, P. (2000). “A policy scenario analysis of sustainable agricultural development options: A case study for Nepal.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 18(2), 111–124.
Loucks, D. P., and Gladwell, J. S. (1999). Sustainability criteria for water resource systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Mays, L. W. (2006). Water resources sustainability, McGraw-Hill, New York City.
Mirchi, A., Watkins, D. W. J., and Madani, K. (2010). “Modeling for watershed planning, management, and decision making.” Watersheds management, restoration and environmental impact, J. C. Vaughn, ed., Nova Science, New York, 420.
Moyle, P. B. (2002). Inland fishes of California, 2nd Ed., Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Moyle, P. B., Katz, J., and Quinones, R. (2011). “Rapid decline of California’s native inland fishes: A status assessment.” Biol. Conserv., 144(10), 2414–2423.
Nardo, M. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and users guide, working paper, OECD, Paris.
National Research Council. (2000). Ecological indicators for the nation, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
OECD (Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation). (2008). “Key environmental indicators.” Paris, 38.
Phillis, Y. A., Kouikoglou, V. S., and Manousiouthakis, V. (2010). “A review of sustainability assessment models as systems of systems.” IEEE Syst. J., 4(1), 15–25.
PPIC (Public Policy Institute of California). (2013). “Data set: PPIC statewide survey data—2013 (Mark Baldassare, survey director; PPIC bears no responsibility for the interpretations presented or conclusions reached based on analysis of the data).” 〈http://www.ppic.org/main/datadepot.asp〉 (Jan. 2013).
Rothman, D., and Mays, L. (2014). “Water resources sustainability: Development of a multiobjective optimization model.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014039.
Sanchez, G. M., et al. (2014). “Development of a socio-ecological environmental justice model for watershed-based management.” J. Hydrol., 518, 162–177.
Santos, N. R., Katz, J. V. E., Moyle, P. B., and Viers, J. H. (2014). “A programmable information system for management and analysis of aquatic species range data in California.” Environ. Modell. Softw., 53, 13–26.
Schueler, T. R., Fraley-McNeal, L., and Cappiella, K. (2009). “Is impervious cover still important? Review of recent research.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 309–315.
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., and Dikshit, A. K. (2009). “An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies.” Ecol. Indic., 9(2), 189–212.
Spangenberg, J. H., and Bonniot, O. (1998). “Sustainability indicators: A compass on the road towards sustainability.” Wuppertal Institute, Dortmund, Germany.
Stojkovic, M., Milosevic, D., Simic, S., and Simic, V. (2014). “Using a fish-based model to assess the ecological status of lotic systems in Serbia.” Water Resour. Manage., 28(13), 4615–4629.
SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board). (2013). “Communities that rely on a contaminated groundwater source for drinking water.” 〈http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/gama/ab2222/docs/ab2222.pdf〉 (Apr. 2013).
Venkatesh, G., Saegrov, S., and Brattebo, H. (2014). “Dynamic metabolism modelling of urban water services—Demonstrating effectiveness as a decision-support tool for Oslo, Norway.” Water Res., 61, 19–33.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
Young, T. F., and Sanzone, S. (2002). “A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological condition: An SAB report.”, EPA Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141Issue 12December 2015

History

Received: May 2, 2014
Accepted: Apr 10, 2015
Published online: Jun 9, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 9, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fraser M. Shilling [email protected]
Academic Coordinator, Dept. of Environmental Science and Policy, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
David P. Waetjen [email protected]
Analyst, Dept. of Environmental Science and Policy, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]
Supervising Water Resources Engineer, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management, California Dept. of Water Resources, P.O. Box 942836, Sacramento, CA 94236-0001. E-mail: [email protected]
Rich Juricich, M.ASCE [email protected]
Principal Water Resources Engineer, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management, California Dept. of Water Resources, P.O. Box 942836, Sacramento, CA 94236-0001. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share