Technical Papers
May 5, 2015

Lifecycle Assessment of a Water Distribution System Pump

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 12

Abstract

This article presents a methodology that combines a process-based lifecycle assessment (LCA) with an economic input-output LCA (EIO-LCA) model to quantify the net present value (NPV) lifecycle costs (LCC), energy consumption, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with a water distribution system (WDS) pump. The methodology considers the manufacturing, use, and end-of-life (EOL) disposal lifecycle stages, as well as processes that are not typically considered, including discharge valve throttling, pump testing, deterioration, refurbishment, and variable-speed pumping. A case study is used to demonstrate the methodology, assess the implications of different operating scenarios, and determine the relative importance of different processes. Results show that a combination of refurbishment and variable-speed pumping is the most effective means of improving sustainability for the case. Analysis of the results shows similar composition profiles for energy consumption and GHG emissions with pump operation representing over 80% of each, whereas manufacturing and pump operation together represent the majority of the NPV LCC. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the planning period, reference target volume, electricity cost, and discount rate are the most influential parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers whose comments helped elevate the quality and content of this article, as well as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and HydraTek & Associates for their financial support. The authors would also like to thank HydraTek & Associates for providing field data for the example WDS pump.

References

Beebe, R. (2004). “Pump performance and the effect of wear.” Chapter 2, Predictive maintenance of pumps using condition monitoring, Elsevier B.V., Oxford, U.K., 21–34.
Brion, L., and Mays, L. (1991). “Methodology for optimal operation of pumping stations in water distribution systems.” J. Hyd. Eng., 1551–1569.
Burton, F. (1996). “Water and wastewater industries: Characteristics and energy management opportunities.”, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
Carnegie Mellon. (2014). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA), US 2002 purchaser model.” Green Design Institute, 〈http://www.eiolca.net/cgi-bin/dft/use.pl〉 (Oct. 4, 2014).
Dandy, G., Roberts, A., Hewitson, C., and Chrystie, P. (2008). “Sustainability objectives for the optimization of water distribution networks.” Proc., 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symp., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Dennison, F., Azapagic, A., Clift, R., and Colbourne, J. (1999). “Life cycle assessment: Comparing strategic options for the mains infrastructure. Part 1.” J. Water Sci. Technol., 39(10–11), 315–319.
Du, F., Woods, G., Kang, D., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2013). “LCA for water and wastewater pipe materials.” J. Environ. Eng., 703–711.
Electric Power Research Institute. (2002). “Water and sustainability (volume 4): U.S. electricity consumption for water supply and treatment—the next half century.”, Palo Alto, CA.
Environment Canada. (2011). “National inventory report– greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada.” Gatineau, QC.
Filion, Y., MacLean, H., and Karney, B. (2004). “Life-cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 120–130.
Flowserve. (2013). “Worthington LNN, LNNV, and LNNC centrifugal pumps: User instructions.” Irving, TX.
Herstein, L., Filion, Y., and Hall, K. (2009). “Evaluating environmental impact in water distribution system design.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 241–250.
HydraTek & Associates. (2013). “Toward municipal sector conservation: A pump efficiency assessment and awareness pilot study.” Toronto.
Johnson, J., Reck, B., and Graedel, T. (2008). “The energy benefit of stainless steel recycling.” Energy Policy J., 36(1), 181–192.
Kurek, W., and Ostfeld, A. (2013). “Multi-objective optimization of water quality, pumps operation, and storage sizing of water distribution systems.” J. Environ. Manage., 115, 189–197.
Lundie, S., Peters, G. M., and Beavis, P. (2004). “Life cycle assessment for sustainable metropolitan water systems planning.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(13), 3465–3473.
Mala-Jetmarova, H., Barton, A., and Bagirov, A. (2014). “Exploration of the trade-offs between water quality and pumping costs in optimal operating of regional multiquality water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014077.
Ontario Ministry of Finance. (2013). “Ontario population projections update: III. Projection results.” 〈http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/economy/demographics/projections/projections2012-036.pdf〉 (Nov. 14, 2013).
Ormsbee, L., and Lansey, K. (1994). “Optimal control of water supply pumping systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann Manage, 237–252.
Ormsbee, L., Walski, T., Chase, D., and Sharp, W. (1989). “Methodology for improving pump operation efficiency.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 148–164.
Ostfeld, A., Oliker, N., and Salomons, E. (2013). “Multiobjective optimization for least cost design and resiliency of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014037.
Pascual, R., Rey, P., Hodkiewicz, M., and Cruz, C. (2011). “Integrated model for optimizing strategic overhaul planning of distributed pump stations.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 275–282.
Racoviceanu, A., Karney, B., Kennedy, C., and Colombo, A. (2007). “Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions inventory for water treatment systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 261–270.
Richardson, S., and Hodkiewicz, M. (2011). “Modeling tool to support budgeting and planning decisions for pump overhauls.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 327–334.
Siemens Building Technologies. (2013). “Sizing and selection of butterfly valves.” Buffalo Grove, IL.
Stokes, J., and Horvath, A. (2006). “Life cycle energy assessment of alternative water supply systems.” Int. J. LCA, 11(5), 335–343.
Stokes, J., and Horvath, A. (2011). “Life-cycle assessment of urban water provision: Tool and case study in California.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 15–24.
Valmatic. (1999). “Flow characteristics of series 2000 butterfly valves, drawing SS-1636.” Valve and Manufacturing Corp., Elmhurst, IL.
Wu, W., Maier, H., and Simpson, A. (2013). “Multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems accounting for economic cost, hydraulic reliability, and greenhouse gas emissions.” Water Resour. Research, 49(3), 1211–1225.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2010a). “Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in multiobjective genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 146–155.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2010b). “Single-objective versus multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems accounting for greenhouse gas emissions by carbon pricing.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 555–565.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141Issue 12December 2015

History

Received: Aug 1, 2014
Accepted: Mar 19, 2015
Published online: May 5, 2015
Discussion open until: Oct 5, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

J. Nault, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
F. Papa, M.ASCE
Principal, HydraTek and Associates, 204-216 Chrislea Rd., Woodbridge, ON, Canada L4L 8S5.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share