Technical Papers
Sep 23, 2014

Water Distribution System Pumping Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Minimization by Considering Time-Dependent Emissions Factors

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 7

Abstract

Human-induced climate change caused by greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has become a significant concern. Although water distribution systems (WDSs) provide an essential service, they also contribute to the release of GHG emissions through the use of electricity from fossil fuel sources for pumping purposes. In this paper, the reduction of both costs and GHG emissions associated with the pumping operation of WDSs is considered. Actual (time-varying) emissions factors (EFs) for the South Australia electricity grid from February 2011 to January 2012 with a 5-min time step are used to evaluate pumping operational GHG emissions and are compared with the use of an average EF, which does not consider the time dependency of EFs. An estimated (typical) 24-h EF curve, which aims to replicate the important aspects of the time dependency of actual EFs, is developed and compared for use in place of actual EFs, for when the actual variations in EFs cannot be accurately predicted for the future. Additionally, modified estimated 24-h EF curves, representing different amounts of renewable energy (wind generation) penetration, are considered to test the sensitivity of solution development to the magnitude of the variations of time-dependent EFs. Through the multiobjective optimization of pumping operations of a case study WDS, it is shown that solutions found using actual EFs can minimize GHG emissions by moving pumping to low-EF times of the day. Conversely, solutions found using an average EF can only minimize GHG emissions by pumping more consistently during the day. Additionally, solutions found using the estimated 24-h EF curve are very similar to those found using the actual EFs, suggesting that the estimated 24-h EF curve can accurately replicate the important characteristics of the time dependency of EFs and can be used in place of actual EFs to find solutions of reduced pumping operational costs and GHG emissions. Furthermore, solutions found using the modified estimated 24-h EF curves show that the development of solutions is dependent on the magnitude of the variations of time-dependent EFs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by resources supplied by eResearch SA. Electricity generation data were provided by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). Funding for this research was provided by the University of Adelaide and the Goyder Institute for Water Research. The authors would like to thank Stephen Carr for his help with modifying and debugging the optimization algorithm used for this study. The authors would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers, whose comments helped to improve the quality of this paper.

References

American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). (2013). U.S. Wind Industry Annual Market Rep., Washington, DC.
Asea Brown Boveri (ABB). (2013). Denmark Energy Efficiency Rep., Zurich, Switzerland.
Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). (2011). South Australian supply and demand outlook, Melbourne, Australia.
Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). (2013a). “Electricity NEM data.” 〈http://www.aemo.com.au/data/market_data.html〉 (Jul. 01, 2013).
Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). (2013b). South Australia Wind Study Rep., Melbourne, Australia.
Australian Energy Regulator. (2012). State of the energy market 2012, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Barán, B., von Lücken, C., and Sotelo, A. (2005). “Multi-objective pump scheduling optimisation using evolutionary strategies.” Adv. Eng. Softw., 36(1), 39–47.
Basupi, I., Kapelan, Z., and Butler, D. (2013). “Reducing life-cycle carbon footprints in the redesign of water distribution systems.” J. Water Clim. Change, 4(3), 176–192.
Basupi, I., Kapelan, Z., and Butler, D. (2014). “Reducing life-cycle carbon footprint in the (re) design of water distribution systems using water demand management interventions.” Urban Water J., 11(2), 91–107.
Boulos, P. F., and Bros, C. M. (2010). “Assessing the carbon footprint of water supply and distribution systems.” J. Am. Water Works Assn., 102(11), 47–54.
Cutler, N. J., Boerema, N. D., MacGill, I. F., and Outhred, H. R. (2011). “High penetration wind generation impacts on spot prices in the Australian national electricity market.” Energy Policy, 39(10), 5939–5949.
Dandy, G., Roberts, A., Hewitson, C., and Chrystie, P. (2006). “Sustainability objectives for the optimization of water distribution networks.” Proc., 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symp., ASCE, Cincinnati, OH.
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., and Meyarivan, T. (2000). “A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II.” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1917, 849–858.
Deb, K., Mohan, M., and Mishra, S. (2003). “Towards a quick computation of well-spread pareto-optimal solutions.” Proc., Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Springer, Faro, Portugal, 222–236.
Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism. (2009). National energy policy—Framework 2030 strategic directions paper, Australian Government, Canberra, Australia.
Du, F., Woods, G. J., Kang, D., Lansey, K. E., and Arnold, R. G. (2013). “Life cycle analysis for water and wastewater pipe materials.” J. Environ. Eng., 703–711.
Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA) Utilities. (2009). Notice of change to ETSA utilities’ distribution tariffs from 1 July 2009, Adelaide, Australia.
Geoscience Australia and Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics (ABARE). (2010). Australian energy resource assessment, Canberra, Australia.
Hadka, D., and Reed, P. (2013). “Borg: An auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing framework.” Evol. Comput., 21(2), 231–259.
Herstein, L., Filion, Y., and Hall, K. (2011). “Evaluating the environmental impacts of water distribution systems by using EIO-LCA-based multiobjective optimization.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 162–172.
Herstein, L. M., and Filion, Y. R. (2011). “Life-cycle assessment of common water main materials in water distribution networks.” J. Hydroinf., 13(3), 346–357.
Herstein, L. M., Filion, Y. R., and Hall, K. R. (2009). “Evaluating environmental impact in water distribution system design.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 241–250.
Kang, D., and Lansey, K. (2012). “Dual water distribution network design under triple-bottom-line objectives.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 162–175.
Kazantzis, M. D., Simpson, A. R., Kwong, D., and Tan, S. M. (2002). “A new methodology for optimizing the daily operations of a pumping plant.” Proc., Conf. on Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Roanoke, VA.
Kollat, J. B., and Reed, P. M. (2006). “Comparing state-of-the-art evolutionary multi-objective algorithms for long-term groundwater monitoring design.” Adv. Water Resour., 29(6), 792–807.
Lopez-Ibanez, M., Devi Prasad, T., and Paechter, B. (2008). “Ant colony optimization for optimal control of pumps in water distribution networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 337–346.
Mackle, G., Savic, D. A., and Walters, G. A. (1995). “Application of genetic algorithms to pump scheduling for water supply.” Proc., Genetic Algorithms in Engineering Systems: Innovations and Applications, Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), Sheffield, England, 400–405.
MacLeod, S., Roshani, E., and Filion, Y. R. (2010). Impact of pipe material selection on greenhouse gas mitigation in water networks under uncertain discount rates and carbon prices, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1014–1027.
MacLeod, S. P., and Filion, Y. R. (2011). “Issues and implications of carbon-abatement discounting and pricing for drinking water system design in Canada.” Water Resour. Manage., 26(1), 43–61.
Marchi, A., et al. (2014). “Battle of the water networks II.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04014009.
McCormick, G., and Powell, R. (2004). “Derivation of near-optimal pump schedules for water distribution by simulated annealing.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 55(7), 728–736.
Molly, J. P. (2011). Status der Windenenergienutzung in Deutschland (Status of wind energy use in Germany), Deutsches Windenergie Institut (DEWI), Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
National Energy Board. (2013). Canada’s energy future 2013, Calgary, AB.
National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE). (2007). Getting to 2050: Canada’s transition to a low-emission future, ON, Canada.
Ormsbee, L. E., and Lansey, K. E. (1994). “Optimal control of water supply pumping systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 237–252.
Ramos, H. M., Kenov, K. N., and Vieira, F. (2011). “Environmentally friendly hybrid solutions to improve the energy and hydraulic efficiency in water supply systems.” Energy Sustainable Dev., 15(4), 436–442.
Red Eléctrica de España. (2013). The Spanish electricity system preliminary report, Madrid, Spain.
Roshani, E., MacLeod, S. P., and Filion, Y. R. (2012). “Evaluating the impact of climate change mitigation strategies on the optimal design and expansion of the Amherstview, Ontario Water Network: A Canadian case study.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 100–110.
Rossman, L. A. (2000). EPANET2 user’s manual, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Salomons, E., Ostfeld, A., Kapelan, Z., Zecchin, A., Marchi, A., and Simpson, A. R. (2012). “The battle of the water networks II.” 14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf., Engineers Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Stokes, C. S., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2014). “The cost–greenhouse gas emission nexus for water distribution systems including the consideration of energy generating infrastructure: An integrated conceptual optimization framework and review of literature.” Earth Perspect., 1(1), 1–17.
Szemis, J. M., Dandy, G. C., and Maier, H. R. (2013). “A multiobjective ant colony optimization approach for scheduling environmental flow management alternatives with application to the River Murray, Australia.” Water Resour. Res., 49(10), 6393–6411.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2012). Electric power monthly February 2012, Washington, DC.
Vrugt, J. A., and Robinson, B. A. (2007). “Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 104(3), 708–711.
Wu, W., Maier, H. R., and Simpson, A. R. (2010a), “Single-objective versus multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems accounting for greenhouse gas emissions by carbon pricing.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 555–565.
Wu, W., Maier, H. R., and Simpson, A. R. (2012a). “Sensitivity of optimal tradeoffs between cost and greenhouse gas emissions for water distribution systems to electricity tariff and generation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 182–186.
Wu, W., Maier, H. R., and Simpson, A. R. (2013). “Multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems accounting for economic cost, hydraulic reliability, and greenhouse gas emissions.” Water Resour. Res., 49(3), 1211–1225.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2010b). “Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in multiobjective genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 146–155.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., Maier, H. R., and Marchi, A. (2012b). “Incorporation of variable-speed pumping in multiobjective genetic algorithm optimization of the design of water transmission systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 543–552.
Zessler, U., and Shamir, U. (1989). “Optimal operation of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 735–752.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141Issue 7July 2015

History

Received: Feb 7, 2014
Accepted: Aug 5, 2014
Published online: Sep 23, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 23, 2015
Published in print: Jul 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher S. Stokes [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Holger R. Maier
Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Angus R. Simpson, M.ASCE
Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share