Technical Papers
Apr 30, 2013

Relationship between Water Withdrawals and Freshwater Ecosystem Water Scarcity Quantified at Multiple Scales for a Great Lakes Watershed

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 139, Issue 6

Abstract

Even in relatively water-rich regions, withdrawal and consumption of water has the potential to create instream freshwater ecosystem water scarcity, especially at seasonal and local scales. Water resource policy must balance consumptive uses of water against corresponding ecosystem impacts of flow depletion. In this study, the concept of an adverse resource impact threshold, as established by the Michigan Water Withdrawal Assessment Process, is applied in conjunction with a water use database to identify the cause, location, and scale in space and time of instream freshwater ecosystem water scarcity caused by consumptive uses of water. The study results show that there is a strong multiscalar linear relationship between freshwater consumption, adverse resource impact ecological flow thresholds, and spatial scale. On average and at the whole-watershed scale, water scarcity does not exist in this watershed, but water scarcity does occur on a localized basis, especially in the summer and at small watershed scales of less than 300km2, because of a combination of irrigation withdrawals, concentrated urban withdrawals, and low ecological flow thresholds. The aggregated effects of localized flow depletion also affect 8002,000km2 scale catchments. Management of water scarcity in water-rich areas should therefore focus on the spatio-temporal locations where the impacts occur and where an average pattern of water abundance yields to localized scarcity, in this case during late summer months in subwatersheds smaller than 300km2. This analysis informs integrated water resources management approaches, contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between scale and environmental impact as water is shared among competing uses, and sheds light on the use of adverse resource impact ecological flow thresholds to define water scarcity in relatively water-rich regions. These results may be generalized to inform the implementation of the Michigan Water Withdrawal Assessment Process and similar processes throughout the Great Lakes region and in water-rich locations around the world where water is generally abundant but localized water scarcity is becoming an increasingly important issue.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding provided by the Great Lakes Protection Fund Grant #946. The conclusions are those of the authors and not necessarily of the Great Lakes Protection Fund. The authors thank their project advisory board’s valuable contributions to this work and Katelyn (FitzGerald) Watson for providing important technical support.

References

Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Poff, N. L., and Naiman, R. J. (2006). “The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.” Ecol. Appl., 16(4), 1311–1318.
Barlow, P. M., Alley, W. M., and Myers, D. N. (2004). “Hydrologic aspects of water sustainability and their relation to a national assessment of water availability and use.” Water Res. Update, (127), 76–86.
Bovee, K. D. (1982). “A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology.” Instream Flow Information Paper No. 12, FWS/OBS 82/26, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
Bovee, K. D., Lamb, B. L., Bartholow, J. M., Stalnaker, C. B., Taylor, J., and Henriksen, J. (1998). “Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology.”, USGS, Biological Resources Div., Fort Collins, CO.
Carreño, L., Frank, F. C., and Viglizzo, E. F. (2012). “Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change.” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 154, 68–77.
Casper, A. F., Dixon, B., Earls, J., and Gore, J. A. (2011). “Linking a spatially explicit watershed model (SWAT) with an in-stream fish habitat model (PHABSIM): A case study of setting minimum flows and levels in a low gradient, sub-tropical river.” River Res. Appl., 27(3), 269–282.
Cavendish, M. G., and Duncan, M. I. (1986). “Use of the instream flow incremental methodology: A tool for negotiation.” Environ. Imp. Assess. Rev., 6(4), 347–363.
Chapagain, A. K., and Hoekstra, A. Y. (2004). “Water footprints of nations.” UNESCO-IHE Research Rep. Series No. 16., UNESCO-IHE, Delft, Netherlands.
Cruickshank, A., and Grover, V. I. (2012). “A brief introduction to integrated water resources management.” Great Lakes: Lessons in participatory governance, V. I. Grover and G. Krantzberg, eds., Science, Enfield, NH, 167–183.
Dodge, J. C. I. (2004). “Background to modern hydrology.” The basis of civilization—Water science?, J. C. Rodda and L. Ubertini, eds., International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, UK.
Dore, M. H. I., and Whorley, D. (2006). “A tale of two waters: The Missouri River, the Great Lakes and management of future water conflicts.” Water Int., 31(4), 488–498.
Dorfman, M., and Rosselot, K. S. (2010). “A guide to water quality at vacation beaches.” 20th Annual Rep., Natural Resources Defense Council, New York.
Great Lakes Commission. (2000). “Assessment of the Lake Michigan monitoring inventory.” Rep. on the Lake Michigan Tributary Monitoring Project, 〈http://www.glc.org/monitoring/lakemich/pdf/full_report.PDF〉 (Sep. 20, 2011).
Hamilton, D. A., and Seelbach, P. W. (2011). “Michigan’s water withdrawal assessment process and internet screening tool.” Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Rep. 55, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Lansing, MI.
Hamilton, D. A., Sorrell, R. C., and Holtschlag, D. J. (2008). “A regression model for computing index flows describing the median flow for the summer month of lowest flow in Michigan.” USGS Scientific Investigations Rep. 2008–5096, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Hobbs, K., and Osann, E. R. (2011). Assessing and advancing the sustainable management of the great lakes through water conservation and efficiency, Natural Resources Defense Council, New York.
Hoekstra, A. Y., and Chapagain, A. K. (2008). Globalization of water: Sharing the planet’s freshwater resources, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
Hoekstra, A. Y., and Mekonnen, M. M. (2012). “The water footprint of humanity.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109(9), 3232–3237.
Hooper, B. P. (2003). “Integrated water resources management and river basin governance.” Water Res. Update, (126), 12–20.
Hunt, B. (1999). “Unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping.” Ground water, 37(1), 98–102.
Jensen, K. H., and Illangasekare, T. H. (2011). “HOBE: A hydrological observatory.” Vadose Zone J., 10(1), 1–7.
Kendy, E., et al. (2009). “Applications of the ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA) in the United States.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Implementing Environmental Water Allocations, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Loik, M. E., Breshears, D. D., Lauenroth, W. K., and Belnap, J. (2004). “A multi-scale perspective of water pulses in dry land ecosystems: Climatology and ecohydrology of the western USA.” Oecologia, 141(2), 269–281.
Luukkonen, C. L., Blumer, S. P., Weaver, T. L., and Jean, J. (2004). “Simulation of the ground-water-flow system in the Kalamazoo County area, Michigan.” USGS Scientific Investigations Rep. 2004-5054, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Lyons, J., Zorn, T. G., Stewart, J., Seelbach, P. W., Wehrly, K. E., and Wang, L. (2009). “Defining, characterizing, and quantifying coolwater streams and their fish assemblages in Michigan and Wisconsin, USA.” N. Am. J. Fisheries Manage., 29(4), 1130–1151.
McDonald, R. I., et al. (2011). “Global urban growth and the geography of water availability, quality, and delivery.” Ambio, 40(5), 437–446.
Michigan Dept. of Agriculture. (2004). Generally accepted agricultural and management practices for irrigation water use, Michigan Commission of Agriculture, Lansing, MI.
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality (MI DEQ). (2006). “Water withdrawals for agricultural irrigation in Michigan 2006.” 〈http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/deq-wd-wurp-Agriculture2006_208270_7.pdf〉 (Oct. 5, 2011).
Miller, J. R., Turner, M. G., Smithwick, E. A. H., Dent, C. L., and Stanley, E. H. (2004). “Spatial extrapolation: The science of predicting ecological patterns and processes.” Bio-sciences, 54(4), 310–320.
Moerke, A. H., and Lamberti, G. A. (2006). “Scale-dependent influences on water quality, habitat, and fish communities in streams of the Kalamazoo River Basin, Michigan (USA).” Aquat. Sci., 68(2), 193–205.
Poff, N. L., et al. (2010). “The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards.” Freshwater Biol., 55(1), 1147–1170.
Reeves, H. W., et al. (2008). “Water withdrawal assessment tool GIS data download.” 〈http://www.miwwat.org/download.asp〉 (Dec. 30, 2011).
Reeves, H. W., Hamilton, D. A., Seelbach, P. W., and Asher, A. J. (2009). “Ground-water-withdrawal component of the Michigan water-withdrawal screening tool.” USGS Scientific Investigations Rep. 2009-5003, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Richter, B. D., Davis, M. M., Apse, C., and Konrad, C. (2012). “Short communication: A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection.” River Res. Applic., 28(8), 1312–1321.
Riseng, C. M., Wiley, M. J., Seelbach, P. W., and Stevenson, R. J. (2010). “An ecological assessment of great lakes tributaries in the Michigan peninsulas.” J. Great Lakes Res., 36(3), 505–519.
Ruddell, B. L. (2006). “Virtual water trade for the future of the Great Lakes.” 〈http://www.public.asu.edu/~bruddell/documents/Ruddell%20(2006)%20Virtual%20Water%20for%20the%20Future%20of%20the%20Great%20Lakes.pdf〉 (Jun. 12, 2012).
Ruddell, B. L. (2009). “Virtual water (for the future of the great lakes).” Proc., ASCE World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE EWRI, Reston, VA.
Sanderson, J. S., Rowan, N., Wilding, T., Bledsoe, B. P., Miller, W. J., and Poff, N. L. (2012). “Getting to scale with environmental flow assessment: The watershed flow evaluation tool.” River Res. Appl., 28(9), 1369–1377.
Schindler, D. W. (1998). “Whole-ecosystem experiments: replication versus realism: the need for ecosystem-scale experiments.” Ecosystem, 1(4), 323–334.
Seaber, P. R., Kapinos, F. P., and Knapp, G. L. (1987). “Hydrologic unit maps.” USGS Water-Supply Paper 2294, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Seelbach, P. W. (2009). “Environmental flow tools used to frame new water management policy in Michigan.” Proc., North American Benthological Society (NABS) 57th Annual Meeting, North American Benthological Society (NABS), Waco, TX.
Shaffer, K. H. (2009). “Variations in withdrawal, return flow, and consumptive use of water in Ohio and Indiana, with selected data from Wisconsin, 1999–2004.” USGS Scientific Investigations Rep. 2009–5096, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Spooner, D. E., Xenopoulos, M. A., Schneider, C., and Woolnough, D. A. (2011). “Coextirpation of host-affiliate relationships in rivers: The role of climate change, water withdrawal, and host-specificity.” Global Change Biol. 17(4), 1720–1732.
Stack, N. T. (2010). “Great Lakes Compact and an Ohio constitutional amendment: Local protectionism and regional cooperation.” Boston Coll. Environ. Aff. Law Rev., 37(2), 493–522.
Steinman, A. D., Luttenton, M., and Havens, K. E. (2004). “Sustainability of surface and subsurface water resources: Case studies from Florida and Michigan, U.S.A.” Water Resour. Update., (127), 100–107.
Steinman, A. D., Nicholas, J. R., Seelbach, P. W., Allan, J. W., and Ruswick, F. (2011). “Science as a fundamental framework for shaping policy discussions regarding the use of groundwater in the state of Michigan: A case study.” Water Policy, 13(1), 69–86.
Tharme, R. E. (2003). “A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers.” River Res. Appl., 19(5–6), 397–442.
Watson, K., Mayer, A., and Reeves, H. (2013). “Groundwater availability as constrained by hydrogeology and environmental flows.” Ground Water.
Weerasinghe, H., and Schneider, U. A. (2010). “Assessment of economically optimal water management and geospatial potential for large-scale water storage.” Geophy. Res. Abstr., 12, 6696.
Yang, Y. E., and Cai, X. (2011). “Reservoir reoperation for fish ecosystem restoration using daily inflows—case study of Lake Shelbyville.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 137(6), 470–480.
Zorn, T. G., Seelbach, P. W., Rutherford, E. S., Wills, T. C., Cheng S. T., and Wiley, M. J. (2008). “A regional-scale habitat suitability model to assess the effects of flow reduction on fish assemblages in Michigan streams.” Fisheries Research Rep. 2089, Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor, MI.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 139Issue 6November 2013
Pages: 671 - 681

History

Received: Jun 12, 2012
Accepted: Apr 26, 2013
Published online: Apr 30, 2013
Discussion open until: Sep 30, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Stanley T. Mubako
Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Engineering, College of Technology and Innovation, Arizona State Univ., Mesa, AZ 85212.
Benjamin L. Ruddell [email protected]
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Engineering, College of Technology and Innovation, Arizona State Univ., Mesa, AZ 85212 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Alex S. Mayer
M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI 49931.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share