Technical Papers
Mar 11, 2013

Nonparametric Benchmarking of Japanese Water Utilities: Institutional and Environmental Factors Affecting Efficiency

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140, Issue 5

Abstract

Although the Japanese water sector is economically and socially important, few empirical studies are available to help analysts and policy-makers understand the performance patterns in the industry. This study applies data envelopment analysis to 5,538 observations of 1,144 utilities that supplied drinking water between 2004 and 2007. With a comprehensive census of utilities, the present study controls for many factors affecting efficiency: region, prefecture, ownership/governance, water source, vertical integration (purchased or produced alone), water or integrated system, production, treatment, transport and distribution of water), peak factor, per capita consumption, customer density, water losses, monthly water charge, outsourcing, subsidies, gross prefecture product, and time. Thus, this study derives comprehensive conclusions regarding efficiency patterns in Japan. The analysis finds that the average level of inefficiency (weighted by volume) is 57% in the constant return to scale model, but only 24% for the (more flexible) variable return to scale model. Improving sector efficiency and transferring funds to more innovative sectors rather than using scarce funds to subsidize water distribution would benefit citizens. Thus, the application of advanced quantitative techniques to Japanese water utilities improves the understanding of efficiency patterns and underscores the importance of in-depth studies of the individual factors examined in this study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aida, K., Cooper, W., Pastor, J., and Sueyoshi, T. (1998). “Evaluating water supply services in Japan with RAM: A range-adjusted measure of inefficiency.” Omega, 26(2), 207–232.
Aitchison, J., and Aitken, C. (1976). “Multivariate binary discrimination by the kernel method.” Biometrika, 63(3), 413–420.
Aubert, C., and Reynaud, A. (2005). “The impact of regulation on cost efficiency: An empirical analysis of Wisconsin water utilities.” J. Prod. Anal., 23(3), 383–409.
Banker, R. (1996). “Hypothesis tests using data envelopment analysis.” J. Prod. Anal., 7(2–3), 139–160.
Berg, S. (2010). Water utility benchmarking: Measurement, methodologies, and performance incentives, International Water Association Publishing, London.
Berg, S., and Marques, R. (2011). “Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: A benchmarking literature survey.” Water Pol., 13(5), 591–606.
Bhattacharyya, A., Harris, T., Narayanan, R., and Raffiee, K. (1995). “Technical inefficiency of rural water utilities.” J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 20(3), 373–391.
Carvalho, P., Berg, S., and Marques, R. (2012). “A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure.” Util. Pol., 21(2), 40–49.
Carvalho, P., and Marques, R. (2011). “The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities.” J. Environ. Manage., 92(10), 2698–2707.
Cazals, C., Florens, J., and Simar, L. (2002). “Nonparametric frontier estimation: A robust approach.” J. Econometrics, 106(1), 1–25.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2(6), 429–444.
Corton, M., and Berg, S. (2009). “Benchmarking Central American water utilities.” Util. Pol., 17(3–4), 267–275.
Daraio, C., and Simar, L. (2005). “Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: A probabilistic approach.” J. Prod. Anal., 24(1), 93–121.
Daraio, C., and Simar, L. (2007). Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Methodology and applications, Springer, New York.
Emrouznejad, A., Parker, R., and Tavares, G. (2008). “Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., 42(3), 151–157.
Fried, H., Lovell, K., and Schmidt, S. (2008). The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity change, Oxford University Press, New York.
Journal of Water Works Industry (JWWI). (2003). Water Japan 2003/4, JWWI, Japan.
Li, Q., and Racine J. S. (2008). “Nonparametric estimation of conditional CDF and quantile functions with mixed categorical and continuous data.” J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 26, 423–434.
Marques, R. (2008). “Comparing private and public performance of Portuguese water utilities.” Water Pol., 10(1), 25–42.
Matsukawa, I., Madono, S., and Nakajima, T. (1993). “An empirical analysis of Ramsey pricing in Japanese electric utilities.” J. Jpn. Int. Econ., 7(3), 256–276.
Ministry of Internal Affairs, and Communications (MIC). (2007). Year book of local public corporations, Tokyo.
Mizutani, F., and Urakami, T. (2001). “Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations.” Pap. Reg. Sci., 80(2), 211–230.
Nakayama, N. (2000). “Measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in water utilities.” J. Publ. Util. Econ., 52, 91–96 (in Japanese).
Nakayama, N. (2002a). “Efficiency and productivity in water utilities in the Hyogo Prefecture.” Stud. Reg. Sci., 32(3), 161–173 (in Japanese).
Nakayama, N. (2002b). “Measurement of economic efficiency in water utilities.” Nihon Keizai Kenkyu, 45, 23–40 (in Japanese).
Nakayama, N. (2008). “An application of yardstick regulation to Japanese water utilities.” Kokusai Chiikikeizai Kenkyu, 9, 75–83 (in Japanese).
Pérard, E. (2009). “Water supply: Public or private? An approach based on cost of funds, transaction costs, efficiency and political costs.” Pol. Soc., 27(3), 193–219.
Phillips, P., and Su, L. (2011). “Non-parametric regression under location shifts.” Econ. J., 14(3), 457–486.
Renzetti, S., and Dupont, D. (2009). “Measuring the technical efficiency of municipal water suppliers: The role of environmental factors.” Land Econ., 85(4), 627–636.
Simar, L., and Wilson, P. (1998). “Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models.” Manage. Sci., 44(1), 49–61.
Simar, L., and Wilson, P. (2000). “A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models.” J. Appl. Stat., 27(6), 779–802.
Simar, L., and Wilson, P. (2008). “Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives.” The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity change, H. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, and S. Schmidt, eds., Oxford University Press, New York, 421–521.
Simões, P., Witte, K., and Marques, R. (2010). “Regulatory structures and the operational environment in the Portuguese solid waste sector.” Waste Manage., 30(6), 1130–1137.
Stolp, C. (1990). “Strengths and weaknesses of data envelopment analysis: An Urban and regional perspective.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 14(2), 103–106.
Tadeo, A., Fernández, F., and Gómez, F. (2009). “The role of environmental factors in water utilities technical efficiency. Empirical evidence from Spanish companies.” Appl. Econ., 41(5), 615–628.
Urakami, T. (2007). “Economies of vertical integration in the Japanese water supply industry.” Jahrb. für Regionalwissenschaft, 27(2), 129–141.
Witte, K., and Marques, R. (2010a). “Incorporating heterogeneity in non-parametric models: A methodological comparison.” Int. J. Oper. Res., 9(2), 188–204.
Witte, K., and Marques, R. (2010b). “Influential observations in frontier models, a robust non-oriented approach to the water sector.” Ann. Oper. Res., 181(1), 377–392.
Woodbury, K., and Dollery, B. (2004). “Efficiency measurement in Australian local government: The case of New South Wales municipal water utilities.” Rev. Pol. Res., 21(5), 615–636.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140Issue 5May 2014
Pages: 562 - 571

History

Received: May 18, 2012
Accepted: Mar 8, 2013
Published online: Mar 11, 2013
Discussion open until: Aug 11, 2013
Published in print: May 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rui Cunha Marques [email protected]
DECivil, IST, Univ. of Lisbon, Avenida Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Sanford Berg [email protected]
Distinguished Service Professor, Public Utility Research Center (PURC), Univ. of Florida, PO Box 117142, Gainesville, FL. E-mail: [email protected]
Shinji Yane [email protected]
Full Professor, St. Andrew’s Univ., Momoyama Gauin Univ., 1-1-Manalino Tzumi, Osaka 554-1198, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share