Impact of Contract Structure and Risk Aversion on Interutility Water Transfer Agreements
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140, Issue 1
Abstract
Water transfers are one method of allowing utilities to meet demand during dry periods while avoiding, or at least forestalling, the construction of costly new supply capacity. Nonetheless, transfer agreements must have clearly defined terms and decision rules to be effectively implemented. In developing these rules, careful consideration should be given to the risk tolerance of both the buying and selling utilities because these factors can significantly impact the nature of the agreements. This study uses a simulation approach to evaluate interutility transfer agreements that include different mechanisms to reduce risk for both the buyer and seller. For the seller these can include seasonal and volume-based transfer limits that ensure its ability to meet the demands of its own customers before making transfers. For the buyer, important features involve defining the conditions under which it can request transfers, a choice dictated by the buyer’s risk tolerance. Several potential agreement structures are considered, with the volume and frequency of transfers as well as the costs varying considerably depending on the risk-reduction mechanisms incorporated. Results indicate that more risk-averse contract structures can significantly increase costs relative to more risk-tolerant scenarios, even though the same reliability objectives are met. While some level of risk aversion is warranted based on uncertainties related to factors such as future demand growth and climate change, the degree of risk aversion justified is a question that deserves greater scrutiny in water resource management plans. In this case, even the most risk-averse agreements were still less expensive than comparable structural alternatives for improving supply reliability.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the North Carolina Urban Water Consortium (funding provided through the North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, Contract No. 50375). Special thanks also to Ed Holland and Pat Davis at the Orange Water and Sewer Authority, Leila Goodwin, and Syd Miller with the Town of Cary and Vicki Westbrook with the City of Durham for their willingness to provide data and advice on this work.
References
Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies. (2007). “Implications of climate change for urban water utilities.” Washington, DC.
Caldwell, C. (2008). “Considerations of risk tolerance in developing probability-based inter-utility transfer agreements.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Characklis, G. W., Griffin, R. C., and Bedient, P. B. (1999). “Improving the ability of a water market to efficiently manage drought.” Water Resour. Res., 35(3), 823–831.
Characklis, G. W., Kirsch, B. R., Ramsey, J., Dillard, K. E. M., and Kelley, C. T. (2006). “Developing portfolios of water supply transfers.” Water Resour. Res., 42(5), 444–454.
Dinar, A., Rosegrant, M. W., and Meinzen-Dick, R. (1997). Water allocation mechanisms—Principles and examples, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Getches, D. H. (1997). Water law in a nutshell, West Publishing, St. Paul, MN.
Gleick, P. H. (2000). “The changing water paradigm: A look at twenty-first century water resources development.” Water Int., 25(1), 197–208.
Green, G. P., and Hamilton, J. R. (2000). “Water allocation, transfers and conservation: Links between policy and hydrology.” Int. J. Water Resour. Develop., 16(2), 197–208.
Hamilton, J. R., Whittlesey, N. K., and Halverson, P. (1989). “Interruptible water markets in the Pacific Northwest.” Am. J. Agric. Econ., 71(1), 63–75.
Hanak, E. (2005). “Stopping the drain: Third-party responses to California’s water market.” Contemp. Econ. Policy, 23(1), 59–77.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Rep. of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Kirsch, B. R., Characklis, G. W., and Zeff, H. B. (2013). “Evaluating the impact of alternative hydro-climate scenarios on transfer agreements: Practical improvement for generating synthetic streamflows.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 396–406.
Livingston, M. L. (1995). “Designing water institutions: Market failures and institutional response.” Water Resour. Manage., 9(3), 203–220.
Lund, J. R. (1988). “Metropolitan water market development: Seattle Washington, 1887–1987.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 223–237.
Lund, J. R., and Israel, M. (1995a). “Optimization of transfers in urban water supply planning.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 41–48.
Lund, J. R., and Israel, M. (1995b). “Water transfers in water resource systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 193–205.
Moreau, D. H. (1991). “A risked-based model for drought contingency planning.” Water Resour. Bull., 27(1), 117–123.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Murphy, J. J., Dinar, A., Howitt, R. E., Mastrangelo, E., Rassenti, S. J., and Smith, V. L. (2007). “Mechanisms for addressing third-party impacts resulting from voluntary water transfers.” Using experimental methods in environmental and resource economics, J. List, ed., Edward Elgar, Northhampton, MA.
National Research Council. (2001). “Envisioning the agenda for water resources research in the twenty-first century.” Water Science and Technology Board, Washington, DC.
North Carolina American Water Works Association-Water Environment Association. (2012). “Building capacity for water resource management.” NC Currents, Spring 2012, Raleigh, NC, 70–72.
North Carolina Dept. of Environment, and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (2001). “State water supply plan.” Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. (2002). “Jordan Lake water supply storage allocation round three: Hearing officer’s report.” North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC.
Orange Water, and Sewer Authority (OWASA). (2001). “OWASA water and sewer master plan: Planning level economic evaluation of raw water supply options.” Technical Memorandum 2.1, Carrboro, NC.
Palmer, R. N., and Characklis, G. W. (2009). “Reducing the costs of meeting regional water demand through risk-based transfer agreements.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(5), 1703–1714.
Postel, S. L. (2000). “Entering an era of water scarcity: The challenges ahead.” Ecol. Appl., 10(4), 941–948.
Scudder, T. (2005). The future of large dams, Cromwell, London.
Watkins, D. W., Jr., and McKinney, D. C. (1997). “Finding robust solutions to water resources problems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 49–58.
Westphal, K. S., Laramie, R. L., Borgatti, D., and Stoops, R. (2007). “Drought management planning with economic and risk factors.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 351–362.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140 • Issue 1 • January 2014
Pages: 100 - 111
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 18, 2011
Accepted: Sep 25, 2012
Published online: Sep 28, 2012
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.