Technical Papers
Aug 17, 2012

Design of Outlet Control Structures for Ecological Detention Ponds

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140, Issue 2

Abstract

Through a simulation modeling approach, this paper seeks to modify the design of detention ponds to preserve the natural ecological flows while satisfying the requisite regulatory flow requirements. This paper will utilize an innovative ecological flow paradigm: the ecoflow statistics. The ecoflow statistics consist of nine hydrological flow statistics that have been shown to be particularly relevant to ecological quality. The statistics include annual and seasonal ecodeficits and ecosurplus, calculated using median annual and seasonal flow duration curves, and the total seasonal ecochange. A new metric called the ecodifference is defined as the weighted sum of the nine ecoflow statistics and represents the hydrologic alteration in the stream. The ecodifference in a receiving stream can be calculated using the outflow hydrograph from a detention pond hydrologic simulator. A design approach using a hydrologic model, detention pond model, and the ecodifference metric will be used to design a series of flow controls in a detention pond outlet control structure that reduces the ecological impact to the stream caused by development while meeting current design regulations. For a case study site, trial designs have demonstrated that improvements in ecological flows can be achieved while meeting design regulations. By introducing this approach for ecological detention ponds and then demonstrating its performance, this paper has potential to impact stormwater management design practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Virginia Water Resources Research Center (VWRRC) and the University of Virginia. We also recognize the advice and assistance provided by E. Hall (University of Virginia Alliance for Computational Science and Engineering).

References

Akan, A. O., and Houghtalen, R. J. (2003). Urban hydrology, hydraulics, and stormwater quality, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Poff, N. L., and Naiman, R. J. (2006). “The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.” Ecol. Appl., 16(4), 1311–1318.
Bragg, O. M., Black, A. R., Duck, R. W., and Rowan, J. S. (2005). “Approaching the physical-biological interface in rivers: A review of methods for ecological evaluation of flow regimes.” Prog. Phys. Geogr., 29(4), 506–531.
Carroll, C., Merton, L., and Burger, P. (2000). “Impact of vegetative cover and slope on runoff, erosion, and water quality for field plots on a range of soil and spoil materials on central Queensland coal mines.” Aust. J. Soil Res., 38(2), 313–328.
Carter, W. R. (1961). “Magnitude and frequency of floods in suburban areas.” U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 424-B: B9-11, USGS, Washington, DC.
Cavendish, M. G., and Duncan, M. I. (1986). “Use of the instream flow incremental methodology: A tool for negotiation.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 6(4), 347–363.
Center for Watershed Protection, and Maryland Dept. of the Environment. (2009). “Maryland stormwater management design manual (2009 revision).” Baltimore, 〈http://www.mde.maryland.gov/programs/water/stormwatermanagementprogram/marylandstormwaterdesignmanual/pages/programs/waterprograms/sedimentandstormwater/stormwater_design/index.aspx〉 (Nov. 12, 2013).
City of Fort Collins. (1999). “Memorandum: New rainfall criteria.” Memorandum to Storm Drainage Design Criteria Users, Utilities Dept., Stormwater Division, Fort Collins, CO.
D’Arcy, P., and Carignan, R. (1997). “Influence of catchment topography on water chemistry in southeastern Québec Shield lakes.” Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54(10), 2215–2227.
Doran, J. W., and Zeiss, M. R. (2000). “Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality.” Appl. Soil Ecol., 15(1), 3–11.
Edgerly, J. L. (2006). “Quantifying urban-induced flow regime alteration using mathematical models and hydrologic metrics.” M.S. thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO.
Gao, Y., Vogel, R. M., Kroll, C. N., Poff, N. L., and Olden, J. D. (2009). “Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration.” J. Hydrol., 374(1–2), 136–147.
Gironas, J., Roesner, L. A., Rossman, L. A., and Davis, J. (2010). “A new applications manual for the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM).” Environ. Model. Software, 25(6), 813–814.
Gove, N. E., Edwards, R. T., and Conquest, L. L. (2001). “Effects of scale on land use and water quality relationships.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(6), 1721–1734.
Hall, M. J. (1984). Urban hydrology, Elsevier, New York.
Mathews, R., and Richter, B. D. (2007). “Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(6), 1400–1413.
MATLAB, version R2011b [Computer software]. Mathworks, Natick, MA.
Matthews, R. C., Jr., and Bao, Y. (1991). “The Texas method of preliminary instream flow determination.” Rivers, 2(4), 295–310.
McMahon, G., Bales, J. D., Coles, J. F., Giddings, E. M. P., and Zappia, H. (2003). “Use of stage data to characterize hydrologic conditions in an urbanizing environment.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(6), 1529–1546.
Milhous, R. T., Updike, M. A., and Schneider, D. M. (1989). “Physical habitat simulation system reference manual—Version 2.” Instream Flow Information Paper 26, USDOI Fish and Wildlife Services, Biology Rep. 89(16), U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Washington, DC.
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). (2010). “Climate data for the nation.” 〈http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/〉 (Jan. 13, 2012).
National Water Information System (NWIS). (2010). “USGS surface-water data for the nation.” 〈http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/sw〉 (Nov. 12, 2013).
Nehrke, S. M., and Roesner, L. A. (2002). ‘‘Effect of detention and BMPs on flow frequency of runoff.’’ Linking stormwater BMP designs and performance to receiving water impact mitigation, B. R. Urbonas, ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, 254–265.
Nehrke, S. M., and Roesner, L. A. (2004). “Effects of design practice for flood control and best management practices on the flow-frequency curve.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 131–139.
Obropta, C. C., and Kardos, J. S. (2007). “Review of urban stormwater quality models: Deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(6), 1508–1523.
Olden, J. D., and Poff, N. L. (2003). “Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes.” River Res. Appl., 19(2), 101–121.
Palau, A., and Alcázar, J. (2012). “The basic flow method for incorporating flow variability in environmental flows.” River Res. Appl., 28(1), 93–102.
Palhegyi, G. (2010a). “Designing stormwater controls to promote sustainable ecosystems: Science and application.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 504–511.
Palhegyi, G. (2010b). “Modeling and sizing bioretention using flow duration control.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 417–425.
Poff, N. L. (1996). “A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale-dependence in some hydrological descriptors.” Freshwater Biol., 36(1), 71–91.
Poff, N. L., et al. (1997). “The natural flow regime.” BioScience, 47(11), 769–784.
Pomeroy, C. A., Postel, N. A., O’Neill, P. A., and Roesner, L. A. (2008). “Development of storm-water management design criteria to maintain geomorphic stability in Kansas City metropolitan area streams.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 562–566.
Puckridge, J. T., Sheldon, F., Walker, K. F., and Boulton, A. J. (1998). “Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers.” Mar. Freshwater Res., 49(1), 55–72.
Reichold, L., Zechman, E. M., Brill, E. D., and Holmes, H. (2010). “Simulation-optimization framework to support sustainable watershed development by mimicking the predevelopment flow regime.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 366–375.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J., Powell, J., and Braun, D. (1996). “A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems.” Conserv. Biol., 10(4), 1163–1174.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Wigington, R., and Braun, D. P. (1997). “How much water does a river need?” Freshwater Biol., 37(1), 231–249.
Richter, B. D., Warner, A. T., Meyer, J. L., and Lutz, K. (2006). “A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations.” River Res. Appl., 22(3), 297–318.
Roesner, L. A., Bledsoe, B. P., and Brashear, R. W. (2001). “Are best-management-practice criteria really environmentally friendly?” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 150–154.
Rohrer, C. A., and Roesner, L. A. (2006). “Matching the critical portion of the flow duration curve to minimize changes in modeled excess shear.” Water Sci. Technol., 54(6–7), 347–354.
Rossman, L. A. (2009). “Storm Water Management Model user’s manual Version 5.0.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Roy, A. H., and Shuster, W. D. (2009). “Assessing impervious surface connectivity and applications for watershed management.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(1), 198–209.
Sansalone, J. J., and Cristina, C. M. (2004). “First flush concepts for suspended and dissolved solids in small impervious watersheds.” J. Environ. Eng., 1301–1314.
Schueler, T. (1995). “Environmental land planning series: Site planning for urban streams protection.” Center for Watershed Protection Publication No. 95708, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC.
Shiau, J., and Wu, F. (2004). “Assessment of hydrologic alterations caused by Chi-Chi diversion weir in Chou-Shui Creek, Taiwan: Opportunities for restoring natural flow conditions.” River Res. Appl., 20(4), 401–412.
Shiau, J., and Wu, F. (2006). “Compromise programming methodology for determining instream flow under multiobjective water allocation criteria.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(5), 1179–1191.
Shiau, J., and Wu, F. (2010). “A dual active-restrictive approach to incorporating environmental flow targets into existing reservoir operation rules.” Water Resour. Res., 46(8), 1–14.
Suen, J. P. (2011). “Determining the ecological flow regime for existing reservoir operation.” Water Resour. Manage., 25(3), 817–825.
Suen, J. P., and Eheart, J. W. (2006). “Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03417.
Tang, Z., Engel, B., Lim, K., Pijanowski, B., and Harbor, J. (2005). “Minimizing the impact of urbanization on long term runoff.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(6), 1347–1359.
Urban Drainage, and Flood Control District (UDFCD). (2001). “Urban storm drainage criteria manual, 2007 revision.” Denver, CO, 〈http://www.udfcd.org/downloads/down_critmanual.htm〉 (Nov. 12, 2013).
Urbonas, B., and Stahre, P. (1993). Storm-water: Best management practices and detention for water quality, drainage and CSO management, PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. (2001). “Water measurement manual.” 〈http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/wmm/index.htm〉 (Nov. 12, 2013).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (1993). “Urban runoff pollution prevention and control planning.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2004). “The use of best management practices (BMPs) in urban watersheds.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2006). “Dry detention ponds.” Fact Sheet, National Menu of Best Management Practices, 〈http://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps〉 (Jan. 13, 2012).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2001). “Our built and natural environments: A technical review of the interactions between land use, transportation, and environmental quality.”, Washington, DC.
Villarreal, E. L., Semadeni-Davies, A., and Bengtsson, L. (2004). “Inner city stormwater control using a combination of best management practices.” Ecol. Eng., 22(4–5), 279–298.
Virginia Dept. of Environment Quality (VADEQ). (2013). “Virginia stormwater handbook—Draft.” 2nd Ed., Richmond, VA, 〈〉.
Vogel, R. M., and Fennessey, N. M. (1994). “Flow duration curves I: A new interpretation and confidence intervals.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 485–504.
Vogel, R. M., Sieber, J., Archfield, S. A., Smith, M. P., Apse, C. D., and Huber-Lee, A. (2007). “Relations among storage, yield, and instream flow.” Water Resour. Res., 43(5), 1–12.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 140Issue 2February 2014
Pages: 250 - 257

History

Received: Jan 13, 2012
Accepted: Jul 26, 2012
Published online: Aug 17, 2012
Discussion open until: Jan 17, 2013
Published in print: Feb 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John T. Mobley
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
Teresa B. Culver [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share