Reservoir Reoperation for Fish Ecosystem Restoration Using Daily Inflows—Case Study of Lake Shelbyville
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137, Issue 6
Abstract
Ecosystem restoration calls for reservoir reoperation. Traditionally, a minimum water release is set as a constraint for downstream ecosystem flow requirement. Recently, research has been conducted for the purpose of recovering natural flow regimes to a practical degree. This paper examines the practicality of adding an ecological objective to the operation of Lake Shelbyville, a reservoir situated on the Kaskaskia River in east central Illinois, which has been used primarily for flood control. A multiobjective optimization model that minimizes flood damage (the dominating priority in the historical operation) and maximizes fish diversity for the downstream ecosystem is developed for daily operation of the reservoir. The challenges addressed in this paper include handling daily reservoir release for the ecological assessment and evaluating the practicality of changing the existing operation rules for the purpose of including an ecological objective. The model results in the reduction of the maximum allowable water release to avoid extreme flooding events and an increase of the minimum water release. Thus, adding an ecological objective to Lake Shelbyville’s operation can improve downstream fish habitat without jeopardizing its original flood control objective. Furthermore, the effect of hydrologic variability on the results is explored with Monte Carlo simulations of reservoir inflows. The robustness analysis shows that the modified operation rules are sensitive to water levels; the biased representation of the role of water level in the reservoir release function can cause the bias of water release from its optimal value. Despite the limited data for the case study, this paper presents a method to improve conventional reservoir operation rules with consideration of both ecological and economic objectives.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Grant No. NSFCBET-0747276.
References
Aksoy, H. (2003). “Markov chain-based modeling techniques for stochastic generation of daily intermittent streamflows.” Adv. Water Resour., 26(6), 663–671.
Bednarek, A. T., and Hart, D. D. (2005). “Modifying dam operations to restore rivers: Ecological responses to Tennessee River dam mitigation.” Ecol. Appl., 15(3), 997–1008.
Burke, M., Jorde, K., and Buffington, J. M. (2009). “Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: Changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(3), S224–S236.
California Dept. of Water Resources. (2005). “System reoperation.” Chapter 19, California water plan 2005 update, Volume 2: Resource management strategies, Sacramento, CA, 5.
Cardwell, H., Jager, H. I., and Sale, M. J. (1996). “Designing instream flows to satisfy fish and human water needs.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. Div., 122(5), 356–363.
Claps, P., Giordano, A., and Laio, F. (2005). “Advances in shot noise modeling of daily streamflows.” Adv. Water Resour., 28(9), 992–1000.
Coops, H., Beklioglu, M., and Crisman, T. L. (2003). “The role of water-level fluctuations in shallow lake ecosystems—Workshop conclusions.” Hydrobiologia, 506(1), 23–27.
Euliss, N. H., and Mushet, D. M. (1996). “Water-level fluctuation in wetlands as a function of landscape condition in the prairie pothole region.” Wetlands Ecol. Manage., 16(4), 587–593.
Harman, C., and Stewardson, M. (2005). “Optimizing dam release rules to meet environmental flow targets.” River Res. Appl., 21(2–3), 113–129.
Hughes, D. A., O’Keeffe, J., Smakhtin, V., and King, J. (1997). “Development of an operating rule model to simulate time series of reservoir releases for instream flow requirements.” Water SA, 23(13), 21–30.
Hughes, D. A., and Ziervogel, G. (1998). “The inclusion of operating rules in a daily reservoir simulation model to determine ecological reserve releases for river maintenance.” Water SA, 24(4), 293–302.
Jager, H. I., and Smith, B. (2008). “Sustainable reservoir operation: Can we generate hydropower and preserve ecosystem values?” River Res. Appl., 24(3), 340–352.
Karamouz, M. M., and Houck, H. (1982). “Annual and monthly reservoir operating rules.” Water Resour. Res., 18(5), 1337–1344.
Lee, H.-L. (1987). “Stochastic dynamic programming for optimal reservoir control.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Lee, H.-L., Liebman, J. C., and Brill, E. D. Jr. (1992). “Performance evaluation of Lake Shelbyville by stochastic dynamic programming.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. Div., 118(2), 185–204.
Momtahen, S., and Dariane, A. B. (2007). “Direct search approaches using genetic algorithms for optimization of water reservoir operating policies.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. Div., 133(3), 202–209.
Murrone, F., Rossi, F., and Claps, P. (1997). “Conceptually-based shot noise modeling of streamflows at short time interval.” Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul., 116), 483–510.
Oliveira, R., and Loucks, D. P. (1997). “Operating rules for multireservoir systems.” Water Resour. Res., 33(4), 839–852.
Poff, N. L., et al. (1997). “The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration.” BioScience, 47(11), 769–784.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., and Braun, D. P. (1996). “A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems.” Conservat. Biol., 10(4), 1163–1174.
Richter, B. D., Mathews, R., Harrison, D. L., and Wigington, R. (2003). “Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity.” Ecol. Appl., 13(1), 206–224.
Sale, M. J., Brill, E. D., and Herrick, E. E. (1982). “An approach to optimizing reservoir operation for downstream aquatic resources.” Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 705–712.
Schaffer, J. (1985). “Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms.” Genetic algorithms and their applications: Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, Psychology Press, Hillsdale, NJ, 93–100.
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
Singh, K. P. (1978). “Optimal operation of Shelbyville and Carlyle Lakes.” Water Resour. Bull., 14(5), 1201–1219.
Singh, K. P., Stall, J. B., Lonnquist, C., and Smith, R. H. (1975). “Analysis of the operation of Lake Shelbyville and Carlyle to maximize agricultural and recreation benefit.” Contract rep., Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL.
Suen, J. P., and Eheart, J. W. (2006). “Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime.” Water Resour. Res., 42, W03417, .
Suen, J. P., Eheart, J. W., Herricks, E. E., and Chang, F. J. (2009). “Evaluating the potential impact of reservoir operation on fish communities.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 135(6), 475–483.
Szilagyi, J., Balint, G., and Csik, A. (2006). “Hybrid, Markov chain-based model for daily streamflow generation at multiple catchment sites.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11(3), 245–256.
Taylor, J., and Stemler, J. (2006). “The Kaskaskia watershed: A case study on cooperation, conflicting project purposes and the watershed approach.” Operating reservoirs in changing condition, ASCE, Reston, VA, 157–165.
Tung, C. P., Hsu, S. Y., Liu, C. M., and Li, J. S. (2003). “Application of the genetic algorithm for optimizing operation rules of the LiYuTan Reservoir in Taiwan.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(3), 649–657.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), St. Louis District. (2008). “Upper Mississippi River Basin, Kaskaskia River Basin, Illinois Lake Shelbyville.” Appendix A, Master reservoir regulation manual, St. Louis, MO.
Vogl, A. L., and Lopes, V. L. (2009). “Impacts of water resources development on flow regimes in the Brazos River.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 157(1–4), 331–345.
Weiss, G. (1977). “Shot noise models for the generation of synthetic streamflow data.” Water Resour. Res., 13(1), 101–108.
Xu, Z., Schuman, A., and Li, J. (2003). “Markov cross-correlation pulse model for daily streamflow generation at multiple sites.” Adv. Water Resour., 26(3), 325–335.
Yang, Y. C. E., Cai, X., and Herricks, E. E. (2008). “Identification of hydrologic indicators related to fish diversity and abundance: A data mining approach for fish community analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 44, W04412, .
You, J.-Y., and Cai, X. (2008). “Hedging rule for reservoir operations: 1. A theoretical analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 44, W01415, .
Zimbelman, D., and Loehlein, W. C., eds. (2006). Operating reservoirs in changing conditions: Proc., Operations Management 2006 Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137 • Issue 6 • November 2011
Pages: 470 - 480
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 4, 2009
Accepted: Dec 7, 2010
Published online: Dec 9, 2010
Published in print: Nov 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.