TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 26, 2010

Integrated Hydrologic-Economic-Institutional Model of Environmental Flow Strategies for Rio Yaqui Basin, Sonora, Mexico

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137, Issue 2

Abstract

An integrated hydrologic-economic-institutional water model was developed for the Rio Yaqui Basin, located in northwest Mexico, with the objective of assessing the impacts on agricultural economic benefits from strategies for allocating environmental flow. This paper focuses on the creation of simulation models that estimate the agricultural net benefits under different environmental flow scenarios and surface water allocation strategies. The results illustrate a trade-off between interannual variability of environmental flows and variability in agricultural benefits, corresponding to economic risk, for three allocation strategies. Results also show that environmental flow allocations affect groundwater levels through impacts on surface-ground water interactions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Acreman, M., and Dunbar, M. J. (2004). “Defining environmental river flow requirements—A review.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8(5), 861–876.
Addams, L. (2004). “Water resource policy evaluation using a combined hydrologic-economic-agronomic modeling framework: Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Anderson, M. P., and Woessner, W. W. (1992). Applied groundwater modeling, simulation of flow and advective transport, Academic Press, New York, 381.
Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Poff, N. L., and Naiman, R. J. (2006). “The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.” Ecol. Appl., 16(4), 1311–1318.
Biggs, B. J. F., Nikora, V. I., and Snelder, T. H. (2005). “Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function.” River Res. Appl., 21, 283–298.
Bovee, K. D., Lamb, B. L., Bartholow, J. M., Stalnaker, C. B., Taylor, J., and Henriksen, J. (1998). “Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology.” Rep. USGS/BRD/ITR-1998-0004. U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO.
Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Lasdon, L. S. (2002). “A framework for sustainability analysis in water resources management and application to the Syr Darya Basin.” Water Resour. Res., 38(6), 1–14.
Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Lasdon, L. S. (2003a). “Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129, 4–17.
Cai, X., Rosegrant, M. W., and Ringler, C. (2003b). “Physical and economic efficiency of water use in the river basin: Implications for efficient water management.” Water Resour. Res., 39(1), 1013.
CNA (Comisión Nacional del Agua). (2004). “Ley de Aguas Nacionales y su reglamento.” México, D.F.
Dunbar, M. J., Acreman, M., and Kirk, S. (2004). “Environmental flow setting in England and Wales: Strategies for managing abstraction in catchments.” Water Environ. J., 18(1), 5–10.
El Imparcial. (2009). Forma parte Hermosillo de proyecto hidraulico. 〈http://www.elimparcial.com/EdicionImpresa/ejemplaresanteriores/BusquedaEjemplares.asp?numnota=817617&fecha=8/1/2010〉 (Jan. 8, 2010).
Gippel, C. J., and Stewardson, M. J. (1998). “Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows.” Regulated Rivers Res. Manage., 14, 53–67.
Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G. (2000). “MODFLOW-2000, the USGS modular ground-water model—User guide to modularization concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process.” Rep. 00-92, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
INEGI (Nacional Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics). (1993). Estudio Hidrológico del Estado de Sonora. México.
Jenkins, M. W., et al. (2004). “Optimization of California’s water system: results and insights.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(4), 271–280.
Kashaigili, J. J., McCartney, M. P., and Mahoo, H. F. (2007). “Estimation of environmental flows in the Great Ruaha River catchment, Tanzania.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 32, 1007–1014.
King, J., Brown, C., and Sabet, H. (2003). “A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers.” River Res. Appl., 19, 619–639.
King, J., Tharme, R. E., and De Villliers, M. S. (2000). “Environmental flow assessments for rivers: manual for the building block methodology.” Rep. TT 131/00, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Loomis, J. B. (2000). “Environmental valuation techniques in water resource decision making.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 126(6), 339–344.
Love, F., Madamombe, E., Marshall, B., and Kaseke, E. (2006). “Preliminary estimate of environmental flow requirements of the Rusape River, Zimbabwe.” Phys. Chem. Earth B, 31, 864–869.
Mayer, A., and Munoz-Hernandez, A. (2009). “Integrated water resources optimization models: An assessment of a multidisciplinary tool for sustainable water resources management strategies.” Geogr., 3, 1176–1195.
Medellin-Azuara, J., Harou, J. J., and Howitt, R. E. (2009). “Estimating economic value of agricultural water under changing conditions and the effects of spatial aggregation.” Sci Total Environ.
Minjares, J. L. (2004). “Sustainable operation of the Yaqui River multiple reservoir system.” Ph.D. dissertation, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM.
Muñoz-Hernández, A. (2009). “Integrated hydrologic-economic-institutional water model for the Rio Yaqui Basin, Sonora, Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI.
Naylor, R. L., Falcon, W. P., and Puente-Gonzalez, A. (2001). “Policy reforms and Mexican agriculture: views from the Yaqui Valley.” Economics Program Paper No. 01-01, CIMMYT, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, El Batán, México.
Ojeda, M. I., Mayer, A. S., and Solomon, B. (2007). “Economic valuation of environmental services sustained by water flows in the Yaqui River Delta.” Ecol. Econ., 65(1), 155–166.
Prickett, T. A. (1967). “Designing pumped well characteristics into electric analog models.” Ground Water, 38–46.
Pulido-Velazquez, M., Andreu-Alvarez, J., and Sahuquillo-Herraiz, A. (2006). “Economic optimization of conjunctive use of surface and ground water at the basin scale.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 132(6), 454–467.
Poff, N. L., et al. (1997). “The natural flow regime.” BioScience, 47(11), 769–784.
Reiser, D. W., Ramey, M. P., and Wesche, T. A. (1989). “Flushing flows.” Alternatives in regulated river management, J. A. Gore and G. E. Petts, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Ringler, C., and Cai, X. (2006). “Valuing fisheries and wetlands using integrated economic hydrologic modeling-Mekong River Basin.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 132(6), 480–487.
Ringler, C., Huy, N. V., and Msangi, S. (2006). “Water allocation policy modeling for the Dong Nai River Basin: an integrated perspective.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(6), 1465–1482.
Rosegrant, M. W., Ringler, C., McKinney, D. C., Cai, X., Keller, A., and Donoso, G. (2000). “Integrated economic-hydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: The Maipo River basin.” Agric. Econ., 24(1), 33–46.
SAGAR (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, y Desarrollo Rural). (2004). Avance del Programa de Siembras y Cosechas del Ciclo Agrícola. Cajeme, México: Gobierno del Estado de Sonora, Distrito de Desarrollo Rural. No. 148.
Schoups, G., Addams, C. L., and Gorelick, S. M. (2005). “Multi-objective calibration of a surface water-groundwater flow model in an irrigated agricultural region: Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 549–568.
Schoups, G., Addams, C. L., Minjares, J. L., and Gorelick, S. M. (2006a). “Reliable conjunctive use rules for sustainable irrigated agriculture and reservoir spill control.” Water Resour. Res., 42, W12406.
Schoups, G., Addams, C. L., Minjares, J. L., and Gorelick, S. M. (2006b). “Sustainable conjunctive water management in irrigated agriculture: Model formulation and application to the Yaqui Valley, Mexico.” Water Resour. Res., 42, W10417.
Stewardson, M. J., and Gippel, C. J. (2003). “Incorporating flow variability into environmental flow regimes using the flow events method.” River Res. Appl., 19, 459–472.
Tharme, R. E. (2003). “A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers.” River Res. Appl., 19, 397–441.
Tennant, D. L. (1976). “Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources.” Fisheries Bull., 1(4), 6–10.
Trescott, P. C., Pinder, G. F., and Larson, S. P (1976). “Finite-difference model for aquifer simulation in two dimensions with results of numerical experiments, USGS, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations.” Book 7, 116.
Yang, Z. F., Sun, T., Cui, B. S., Chen, B., and Chen, G. Q. (2009). “Environmental flow requirements for integrated water resources allocation in the Yellow River Basin, China.” Comm. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 14(5), 2469–2481.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137Issue 2March 2011
Pages: 227 - 237

History

Received: Jun 6, 2009
Accepted: Jun 23, 2010
Published online: Jun 26, 2010
Published in print: Mar 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrea Munoz-Hernandez
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI 49931.
Alex S. Mayer, M.ASCE [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI 49931 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
David W. Watkins Jr., M.ASCE
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI 49931.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share