Technical Papers
Jun 28, 2016

Condition Improvement Measurement Using the Condition Evaluation Criteria of Concrete Bridge Decks

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 11

Abstract

Maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) are cost-effective activities for maintaining good serviceability of concrete bridge decks during their lifetimes. Many past studies were conducted to provide public agencies with optimal MR&R strategies for selecting the correct treatment types at the appropriate application times. While researchers did establish and confirm that the annual deterioration rate and the effectiveness of the MR&R activities are the key input factors that affect the outcomes of MR&R strategy models, they did not spend nearly as much time on engineering inquiry to measure the effectiveness of MR&R activities as they did on projecting the deterioration patterns of bridge systems. The issues of selection bias, empirical data reliability, and overstatement of the effectiveness of MR&R activities continue to compromise the present methods. Therefore, this paper presents a new method that addresses these issues by utilizing the bridge condition evaluation criteria commonly applied among state DOTs in the United States. The new method’s model was tested using a case study that verified its usefulness for a state DOT to establish reliable, practical MR&R strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al-Mansour, A., Sinha, K. and Kuczed, T. (1994). “Effects of routine maintenance on flexible pavement condition.” J. Transp. Eng., 65–73.
Chu, C.-Y., and Durango-Cohen, P. L. (2008). “Incorporating maintenance effectiveness in the estimation of dynamic infrastructure performance models.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 23(3), 174–188.
Colucci-Rios, B., and Sinha, K. C. (1985). “Optimal pavement management approach using roughness measurements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1048, 14–22.
Evolver 5.7 [Computer software]. PALISADE, Ithaca, NY.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (1995). “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges.”, Washington, DC.
Frangopol, D. (2011). “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(6), 389–413.
Gao, L., and Zhang, Z. (2008). “Robust optimization for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation.” Proc., 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hegazy, T., Elbeltagi, E., and El-Behairy, H. (2004). “Bridge deck management system with integrated life cycle cost optimization.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1866, 44–50.
Hong, T., and Hastak, M. (2005). “MEMRRES: Model for evaluating maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation strategies for concrete bridge decks.” J. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 22(4), 233–248.
Hong, T. H. (2003). “Evaluation of maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) strategy in concrete bridge deck.” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
INDOT (Indiana Department of Transportation). (2011). “Bridge inspection program—Coding guide.” Indianapolis.
Kleiner, Y., Rajani, B., and Sadiq, R. (2006). “Failure risk management of buried infrastructure using fuzzy-based techniques.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol.—Aqua, 55(2), 81–94.
Labi, S., and Sinha, K. (2003). “Measures of short-term effectiveness of highway pavement maintenance.” J. Transp. Eng., 673–683.
Li, Y., and Madanat, S. (2002). “A steady-state solution for the optimal pavement resurfacing problem.” Transp. Res. Part A, 36(6), 525–535.
Madanat, S., and Mishalani, R. (1998). “Selectivity bias in modeling highway pavement maintenance effectiveness.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 134–137.
Madanat, S., Mishalani, R., and Ibrahim, W. (1995). “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 120–125.
Madanat, S., Nakat, Z., and Jin, E. (2010). “Empirical modeling of pavement overlay crack progression with field data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 292–298.
Mamaghani, I., Moretti, C., and Dockter, B. (2007). “Application of sealing agents in concrete durability of infrastructure systems.” North Dakota Dept. of Transportation, Bismark, ND.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2003). “Bridge life-cycle cost analysis.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Neves, L. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2005). “Condition, safety, and cost profiles for deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 89(2), 185–198.
ODOT (Ohio Dept. of Transportation). (2006). “Manual of bridge inspection.” Columbus, OH.
Ouyang, Y., and Madanat, S. (2004). “Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: Exact and approximate solutions.” Transp. Res. Part A, 38(5), 347–365.
Pace, D. K. (2004). “Modeling and simulation verification and validation challenges.” John Hopkins APL Tech. Digest, 25(2), 163–172.
Pantelias, A., and Zhang, Z. (2009). “Quadratic linear control approach to managing network-level performance goals of pavement infrastructure systems.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2093, 57–66.
Paterson, W. D. (1990). “Quantifying the effectiveness of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation.” 6th REAAA Conf., Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Petcherdchoo, A., Neves, L., and Frangopol, D. (2008). “Optimizing lifetime condition and reliability of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 544–552.
Radomski, W. (2002). Bridge rehabilitation, Imperial College Press, London.
Seo, J. (1994). “A Lagrangean relaxation and network approach to large-scale optimization for bridge management systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Sinha, K., Labi, S., McCullouch, B., Bhargava, A., and Bai, Q. (2009). “Updating and enhancing the Indiana Bridge Management System (IBMS).”, Joint Transportation Research Program of Indiana Dept. of Transportation and Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Tsunokawa, K., and Schofer, J. L. (1994). “Trend curve optimal control model for highway pavement maintenance: Case study and evaluation.” Transp. Res. Part A, 28(2), 151–166.
U.S. OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget). (2015). “2015 discount rates for OMB Circular No. A-94.” 〈https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2015/m-15-05.pdf〉 (Feb. 22, 2016).
van Noortwijk, J., and Frangopol, D. (2004). “Two probabilistic life-cycle maintenance models for deteriorating civil infrastructures.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 19(4), 345–359.
Wakchaure, S., and Jha, K. (2011). “Prioritization of bridges for maintenance planning using data envelopment analysis.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 29(9), 957–968.
Walls, J., III, and Smith, M. (1998). “Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Williamson, G. (2007). “Service life modeling of Virginia bridge decks.” Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142Issue 11November 2016

History

Received: Mar 7, 2016
Accepted: Apr 18, 2016
Published online: Jun 28, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yoojung Yoon, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV 26506 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Makarand Hastak, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Head, Division of Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share