Design of LRT Signal Priority to Improve Arterial Traffic Mobility
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 9
Abstract
Transit signal priority (TSP) is a cost-effective strategy for improving the movement of public transit vehicles, such as Light Rail Transit (LRT), buses, and streetcars, through controlled intersections. The application of TSP strategies improves the reliability and quality of service for transit vehicles with less disruption to normal traffic. The City of Edmonton in Alberta, Canada has recently extended its LRT system, which mainly runs through at-grade intersections. Edmonton’s LRT is currently operating under pre-emption, which causes significant delays to other traffic. The problem is especially pronounced during peak hours when the LRT headway is decreased to 5 min in both directions. This has led to dissatisfaction among motorists using the roadway along the LRT corridor. This paper analyzes different TSP strategies for improving the performance of the LRT corridor. A standard microsimulation tool with a ring barrier controller emulator was used to implement the strategies at a major intersection during peak hours. Field data for both morning and evening peak hours were collected at four intersections along the LRT corridor for the calibration of the model. Three strategies were explored in this paper: (1) simple LRT pre-emption, (2) LRT prediction and pre-emption, and (3) LRT prediction and pre-emption together with transit bus priority. A number of performance measures were used to evaluate each strategy. Results revealed that Strategy 2, where LRT arrival time is predicted to provide LRT pre-emption, yields the highest improvement in corridor performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Al-Sahili, K. A., and Taylor, W. C. (1996). “Evaluation of bus priority signal strategies in Ann Arbor, Michigan.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1554, 74–79.
Bauer, T., and Fuller, P. (2002). “An evaluation of light rail transit signal control options.” ITE Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Philadelphia.
Dion, F., Rakha, H., and Zhang, Y. (2004). “Evaluation of potential transit signal priority benefits along a fixed-time signalized arterial.” J. Transp. Eng., 294–303.
Garrow, M., and Machemehl, R. (1997). “Development and evaluation of transit priority strategies.”, South Region Univ. Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Kimpel, T. J., Strathman, J., Bertini, R. L., and Callas, S. (2005). “Analysis of transit signal priority using archived TriMet bus dispatch system data.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1925, 156–166.
Lee, J., Shalaby, A., Greenough, J., Bowie, M., and Hung, S. (2005). “Advanced transit signal priority control with online microsimulation-based transit prediction model.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1925, 185–194.
Li, M. (2010). “Development and applications of adaptive transit signal priority systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, Japan.
Li, M., Wu, G., Li, Y., Bu, F., and Zhang, W. (2007). “Active signal priority for light rail transit at grade crossings.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2035, 141–149.
Liu, H., Zhang, J., and Cheng, D. (2008). “Analytical approach to evaluating transit signal priority.” Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 8(2), 48–57.
Mahmud, F, and Cetin, M. (2010). “Transit signal priority assessment for LRT in downtown norfolk: Transit preference vs. traffic impacts.” Student MS&V Capstone Conf., Modeling Simulation and Analysis Center (VMASC), Suffolk, VA.
Ngan, V. W. K. (2003). “A comprehensive strategy for transit signal priority.” ITE J., 73(11), 28–32.
Tan, C., Park, S., Liu, H., Xu, Q., and Lau, P. (2008). “Prediction of transit vehicle arrival time for signal priority control: Algorithm and performance.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 9(4), 688–696.
VISSIM 5.30 [Computer software]. PTV Vision, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Wadjas, Y., and Furth, P. (2003). “Transit signal priority along arterials using advanced detection.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1856, 220–230.
Wattleworth, J A., Courage, K. G., and Wallace, C. E. (1977). “Evaluation of bus-priority strategies on Northwest Seventh Avenue in Miami.” Transp. Res. Rec., 626, 32–35.
Zheng, J., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., and Briglia, P. (2009). “Evaluation of transit signal priority using observed and simulated data.” ITE J., 79(11), 42–49.
Zlatkovic, M., Martin, P. T., and Stevanovic, A. (2010). “Evaluation of transit signal priority in TBC and ASC/3 software-in-the-loop simulation environment.” 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 6, 2012
Accepted: Oct 19, 2015
Published online: Apr 18, 2016
Published in print: Sep 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Sep 18, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.