Predictive Maintenance Model for Ballast Tamping
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 4
Abstract
In order to optimally schedule railway track maintenance operations, it is essential to accurately estimate future track conditions. This study proposes a railway track geometry degradation model that considers uncertainties in the forecast by defining a track geometry reliability parameter. The degradation model is integrated in a multiobjective optimization approach to assess railway track maintenance strategies considering a cost–reliability trade off. Finally, a numerical application of the model to a real case study is presented. The results show the usefulness of the proposed approach to guarantee a required track geometry performance with effective maintenance investments.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Portuguese Railway Infrastructure Manager, REFER, E.P.E., for its support and cooperation. The support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT (Project Reference PTDC/SENTRA/112975/2009) and MIT Portugal is also gratefully acknowledged.
References
Abu-Lebdeh, G., Chen, H., and Ghanim, M. (2014). “Improving performance of genetic algorithms for transportation systems: Case of parallel genetic algorithms.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., A4014002.
Andrade, A., and Teixeira, P. (2011a). “Biobjective optimization model for maintenance and renewal decisions related to rail track geometry.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2261, 163–170.
Andrade, A., and Teixeira, P. (2011b). “Uncertainty in rail-track geometry degradation: Lisbon-oporto line case study.” J. Transp. Eng., 193–200.
Andrade, A., and Teixeira, P. (2013). “Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of rail track geometry degradation.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 227(4), 364–375.
Andrade, A., and Teixeira, P. (2014). “Unplanned-maintenance needs related to rail track geometry.” Proc. ICE Transp., 167(6), 400–410.
Audley, M., and Andrews, J. D. (2013). “The effects of tamping on railway track geometry degradation.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 227(4), 376–391.
Bai, Q., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2012). “Trade-off analysis for multiobjective optimization in transportation asset management by generating Pareto frontiers using extreme points nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II.” J. Transp. Eng., 798–808.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2008). “Railway applications—Track—Track geometry quality. Part 5: Geometric quality levels.” EN 13848-5, Brussels, Belgium.
Coello Coello, C. A., Lamont, G. B., and Van Veldhuizen, D. A. (2007). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems, Springer, New York.
Deb, K. (1999). “Multi-objective genetic algorithms: Problem difficulties and construction of test problems.” Evol. Comput., 7(3), 205–230.
Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Wiley, New York.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6(2), 182–197.
Esveld, C. (2001). Modern railway track, MRT Productions, Zaltbommel, Netherlands.
Famurewa, S., Xin, T., Rantatalo, M., and Kumar, U. (2015). “Optimisation of maintenance track possession time: A tamping case study.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 229(1), 12–22.
Gosse, C., Smith, B., and Clarens, A. (2013). “Environmentally preferable pavement management systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 315–325.
Jovanovic, S., Guler, H., and Evren, G. (2011). “Modelling railway track geometry deterioration.” Proc. ICE Transp., 164(2), 65–75.
Konak, A., Coit, D., and Smith, A. (2006). “Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 91(9), 992–1007.
Lyngby, N., Hokstad, P., and Vatn, J. (2008). “RAMS management of railway tracks.” Handbook of performability engineering, K. B. Misra, eds., Springer, London, 1123–1145.
MATLAB version R2010a [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Meier-Hirmer, C., Riboulet, G., Sourget, F., and Roussignol, M. (2009). “Maintenance optimization for a system with a gamma deterioration process and intervention delay: Application to track maintenance.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 223(3), 189–198.
Prescott, D., and Andrews, J. (2015). “Investigating railway track asset management using a Markov analysis.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 229(4), 402–416.
Quiroga, L., and Schnieder, E. (2012). “Monte Carlo simulation of railway track geometry deterioration and restoration.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 226(3), 274–282.
Rausand, M., and Høyland, A. (2004). System reliability theory: Models, statistical methods, and applications, Wiley, NJ.
REFER. (2009). “IT.VIA.018–Tolerâncias dos parâmetros geométricos da via.” Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese).
Riessberger, K. (2001). “Extending maintenance cycles and ballast life.” 7th Int. Heavy Haul Conf., International Heavy Haul Association, Brisbane, Australia.
Wu, Z., Flintsch, G., Ferreira, A., and Picado-Santos, L. (2012). “Framework for multiobjective optimization of physical highway assets investments.” J. Transp. Eng., 1411–1421.
Zhang, T., Andrews, J., and Wang, R. (2013). “Optimal scheduling of track maintenance on a railway network.” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 29(2), 285–297.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142 • Issue 4 • April 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 29, 2014
Accepted: Oct 7, 2015
Published online: Jan 11, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 11, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.