Technical Papers
Oct 5, 2015

Alternative Information Signs: Evaluation of Driver Comprehension and Visual Attention

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 1

Abstract

The effectiveness of a traffic sign is collectively influenced by the sign’s understandability, legibility distance, glance legibility, and learnability; however, understandability has been repeatedly identified as one of the most important effectiveness measures. This study contributes to best practices for evaluating traffic sign understandability by demonstrating and comparing a variety of online survey questions and immersive driving simulation tasks. These techniques were applied to assess the understandability of five alternative tourist information (TI) signs in Oregon. Several TI sign alternatives were first tested in an online survey with 142 participants, followed by more authentic testing of 42 participants in the Oregon State University Driving Simulator. Sign INFO was correctly understood by 95.7% of the driving simulator subjects. Similar results were obtained for the other testing modalities. Notably, the understandability of TI sign alternatives, including versions with (75.4%) and without (72.8%) a circular border, did not score as high despite their prevalent usage in other contexts. However, the Sign i comprehension rates increased dramatically over those from an earlier study, indicating that periodic review of sign comprehension rates may be needed to reflect changes in understandability with time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This project was jointly funded by Travel Oregon and the Pacific Northwest Transportation Consortium (PacTrans). The authors would like to recognize the contributions of time and technical expertise provided by Scott West and Carole Astley of Travel Oregon, Natalie Inouye of Travel Lane County, and Michael Kimlinger with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). This study was conducted with support from the Oregon State Center for Healthy Aging Research, Life Registry.

References

ANSI (American National Standards Institute). (2011). “ANSI Z535.3 criteria for safety symbols.” National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA.
Babbitt Kline, T. J., Ghali, L. M., Kline, D. W., and Brown, S. (1990). “Visibility distance of highway signs among young, middle-aged, and older observers: Icons are better than text.” Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc., 32(5), 609–619.
Benjamini, Y., and Yekutieli, D. (2001). “The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency.” Ann. Stat., 29, 1165–1188.
Castro, C., Horberry, T., and Gale, A. (2004). “The effect of semantic and repetition priming on traffic sign recognition.” Vision in vehicles, Univ. of Derby, Derby, U.K.
Dean Runyan Associates. (2014). “Oregon travel impacts 1991–2013p. Statewide preliminary estimates.” Oregon Tourism Commission, Salem, OR, 1–239.
Dewar, R. (1988). “Criteria for the design and evaluation of traffic sign symbols.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–6.
Ells, J. G., and Dewar, R. E. (1979). “Rapid comprehension of verbal and symbolic traffic sign messages.” Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Soc., 21(2), 161–168.
FHWA. (2000). “Manual on uniform traffic control devices.” U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
FHWA. (2003). “Manual on uniform traffic control devices.” U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
FHWA. (2009). “Manual on uniform traffic control devices.” U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
Hurwitz, D., Monsere, C., Marnell, P., and Paulsen, K. (2014). “Three- or four-section displays for permissive left turns? Some evidence from a simulator-based analysis of driver performance.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Katz, B. J., Dagnal, E. E., and O’Donnell, C. C. (2012). “Evaluation of comprehension and legibility of international and domestic nonstandard symbol signs.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 46–60.
Katz, B. J., Hawkins, G., Kennedy, J. F., and Howard, H. R. (2008). “Design and evaluation of selected symbol signs.”, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Konstantopoulous, P., Chapman, P., and Crundall, D. (2010). “Driver’s visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers’ eye movements in day, night and rain driving.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 42(3), 827–834.
Marnell, P., Tuss, H., Hurwitz, D., Paulsen, K., and Monsere, C. (2013). “Permissive left-turn behavior at the flashing yellow arrow in the presence of pedestrians.” Proc., 7th Int. Driving Assessment Conf. Compendium, Univ. of Iowa, Ames, IA, 488–494.
Paniati, J. F. (1988). “Legibility and comprehension of traffic sign symbols.” Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 568–572.
Ramsey, F. L., and Schafer, D. W. (2013). The statistical sleuth: A course in methods of data analysis, Brooks/Cole, Boston.
Smiley, A., MacGregor, C., Dewar, R. E., and Blamey, C. (1998). “Evaluation of prototype highway tourist signs for Ontario.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–40.
UNWTO (United Nations World Tourism Organization). (2000). “Recommendation on the tourist information sign.”, New York.
Walker, R. E., Nicolay, R. C., and Stearns, C. R. (1965). “Comparative accuracy of recognizing American and international road signs.” J. Appl. Psychol., 49(5), 322–325.
Wolff, J. S., and Wogalter, M. S. (1998). “Comprehension of pictorial symbols: Effects of context and test method.” Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc., 40(2), 173–186.
Zwaga, H. J. (1989). “Comprehensibility estimates of public information symbols; their validity and use.” Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 33, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 979–983.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142Issue 1January 2016

History

Received: Jul 18, 2014
Accepted: Jul 16, 2015
Published online: Oct 5, 2015
Published in print: Jan 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Mar 5, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Justin M. Neill [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. E-mail: [email protected]
David S. Hurwitz, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Michael J. Olsen, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share