Case Studies
Jan 13, 2015

Comparison of Two Simulation Approaches to Safety Assessment: Cellular Automata and SSAM

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 6

Abstract

A study is conducted to compare two simulation methods for estimating conflicts between road users. An improved cellular automata (CA) model is proposed to estimate the occurrences and severity of traffic conflicts (both vehicle–vehicle and vehicle–pedestrian) at signalized intersections. The proposed CA model is compared with a calibrated method of a surrogate safety assessment model (SSAM) based on Vissim. Simulated conflicts from both methods are compared with observed vehicle conflicts from automated vehicle tracking for both occurrences and severity. Simulation results show that the CA approach is able to replicate realistic conflicts. However, SSAM tends to overestimate occurrences and underestimate the severity of rear-end and lane-change conflicts. SSAM has also been found to overestimate the severity of crossing conflicts. Furthermore, the proposed CA model is able to estimate conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editorial board and anonymous reviewers for their comments and valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript. This study is supported by the Ministry of Education AcRF Tier II Grant (ARC18/14) of Singapore.

References

Amundsen, F., and Hydén, C., eds. (1977). Proc., 1st workshop on traffic conflicts, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway.
Blue, V. J., and Adler, J. L. (2001). “Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways.” Transp. Res. Part B, 35(3), 293–312.
Chai, C., and Wong, Y. D. (2013). “Automatic vehicle classification and tracking method for vehicle movements at signalized intersections.” IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symp., IEEE, New York, 624–629.
Chai, C., and Wong, Y. D. (2014). “Traffic performance of shared lanes at signalized intersections based on cellular automata modeling.” J. Adv. Transp., 48(8), 1051–1065.
Ciro, C., and Maurizio, G.(2013). “A new bivariate regression model for the simultaneous analysis of total and severe crashes occurrence.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 6(1), 78–94.
Cooper, P. J. (1984). “Experience with traffic conflicts in Canada with emphasis on “Post encroachment time” techniques.” Int. Calibration Study Traffic Conflict Tech., 5, 75–96.
Cunto, F., and Saccomanno, F. (2008). “Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 40(3), 1171–1179.
El-Basyouny, K., and Sayed, T. (2013). “Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts.” Saf. Sci., 51(1), 160–164.
FHWA. (2011). “SSAM 2.1.6 release notes.”〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/downloads/research/safety/ssam/ssam2_1_6_release_notes.cfm〉 (Dec. 3, 2014).
Ge, Q., and Menendez, M. (2012). “Sensitivity analysis for calibrating VISSIM in modeling the Zurich network.” 12th Swiss Transport Research Conf.
Gettman, D., Pu, L., Sayed, T., and Shelb, S. (2008). “Surrogate safety assessment model and validation: Final report.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Guo, F., et al. (2010). “Evaluating the relationship between near-crashes and crashes: Can near-crashes serve as a surrogate safety metric for crashes?” DOT HS 811 382.
Hau, L. P., and Ho, S. T. (2010). “The development of an accident black spot program in Singapore.” Road Eng. Assoc. Asia Australas. J., 16(1), 37–42.
Hirst, S., and Graham, R. (1997). “The format and presentation of collision warnings.” Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces, Y. I. Noy, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Huang, F., Liu, P., Yu, H., and Wang, W. (2013). “Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 50, 1014–1024.
Iswaran, S. (2013). “Average of 82 accidents happen at pedestrian crossings per year.” CHANNEL NEWASIA, 〈http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/average-of-82-traffic/631658.html〉 (May 6, 2014).
Jin, C. J., Wang, W., Jiang, R., and Wang, H. (2014). “Cellular automaton simulations of a four-let intersection with two-phase signalization.” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 25(3), 1350099.
Kerner, B. S., Klenov, S. L., and Schreckenberg, M. (2011). “Simple cellular automaton model for traffic breakdown, highway capacity, and synchronized flow.” Phys. Rev. E, 84(4), 046110.
Kirk, A., and Stamatiadis, N. (2012). “Development of intersection safety exposure estimates through conflict models.” 91st Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Kusumawati, A. (2008). “Traffic safety at road junctions.” Ph.D. thesis, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore.
Lee, D. N. (1976). “A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision.” Perception, 5(4), 437–459.
Meng, Q., and Weng, J. X. (2011). “An improved cellular automata model for heterogeneous work zone traffic.” Transp. Res. Part C, 19(6), 1263–1275.
Morris, M. D. (1991). “Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments.” Technometrics, 33(2), 161–174.
Oh, C., and Kim, T. (2010). “Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 42(6), 1888–1893.
Oh, J., Kim, E., Kim, M., and Choo, S. (2010). “Development of conflict techniques for left-turn and cross-traffic at protected left-turn signalized intersections.” Saf. Sci., 48(4), 460–468.
Oh, J., Washington, S., and Choi, K. (2003). “Validation of FHWH crash models for rural intersections: Lesson learned.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 41–49.
Persaud, B., Lord, D., and Palmisano, J. (2002). “Calibration and transferability of accident prediction models for urban intersections.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 57–64.
PTV. (2006). PTV Vissim user manual.
Ren, G., Gu, C., Lu, L. L., Zhou, Z. P., and Ding, C. Z. (2012). “Modelling risk degree of conflicts between crossing pedestrians and vehicles at signalized intersections.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 12(5), 76–81.
Sayed, T., and Zein, S. (1999). “Traffic conflict standards for intersections.” Transp. Plann. Technol., 22(4), 309–323.
Spyropoulou, I. (2007). “Modelling a signal controlled traffic stream using cellular automata.” Transp. Res. C, 15(3), 175–190.
Tarko, A., Davis, G., Saunier, N., Sayed, T., and Washington, S. (2009). “Surrogate measures of safety—White paper.” 88th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, DC.
Tian, L. J. (2012). “Traffic flow simulation in a scenario with signalized intersection and bus stop.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 12(5), 90–96.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway capacity manual.
Van der Horst, R. (1991). “Time-to-collision as a cue for decision making in braking.” Vision Veh., 3, 19–26.
Van der Horst, R., and Hogema, J. (1994). “Time-to-collision and collision avoidance systems.” Proc., 6th International Co-operation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety (ICTCT) Workshop, Salzburg, Austria.
Van Nes, N., Christoph, M., and Hoedemaeker, M. (2013). “The value of site-based observations complementary to naturalistic driving observations: A pilot study on the right turn manoeuvre.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 58, 318–329.
Wang, C., and Stamatiadis, N. (2013). “Evaluation of a simulation-based surrogate safety metric.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 71, 82–92.
Weng, J. X., and Meng, Q. (2014). “Rear-end crash potential estimation in the work zone merging areas.” J. Adv. Transp., 48(3), 238–249.
Weng, J. X., Meng, Q., and Yan, X. D. (2014). “Analysis of work zone rear-end crash risk for different vehicle-following patterns.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 72, 449–457.
Wolfram, S. (1984). “Cellular automata as models of complexity.” Nature, 311(5985), 419–424.
Wu, K. F., and Jovanis, P. P. (2012). “Crashes and crash-surrogate events: Exploratory modeling with naturalistic driving data.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 45, 507–516.
Zhang, L., and Prevedouros, P. D. (2003). “Signalized intersection level of service incorporating safety risk.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 77–86.
Zheng, J., Suzuki, K., Fujita, M. (2012). “Modelling a vehicle's speed fluctuation with a cellular automata model.” WIT Trans. Built Environ., 128, 371–382.
Zheng, Z. D., Ahn, S., and Monsere, C. M. (2010). “Impact of traffic oscillations on freeway crash occurrences.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 42(2), 626–636.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 141Issue 6June 2015

History

Received: Apr 1, 2014
Accepted: Nov 20, 2014
Published online: Jan 13, 2015
Published in print: Jun 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Jun 13, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Center for Infrastructure Systems, Nanyang Technological Univ., 50 Nanyang Ave., Singapore 639798, Singapore (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Center Director, Center for Infrastructure Systems, Nanyang Technological Univ., 50 Nanyang Ave., Singapore 639798, Singapore. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share