Technical Papers
Jun 23, 2014

Influence of Pavement Condition on Environmental Costs

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 10

Abstract

Pavement conditions significantly influence the generation of nuisances that influence the environment and increase the costs borne by society. This paper presents a new tool designed to monetize and incorporate environmental impacts in decision-making processes. The Pavement Environmental Impact Model (PEIM) is the first attempt to adapt the Impact Pathway Approach (IPA) to assess the emission, dispersion, and impact of noise, air pollution, and greenhouse gases so that environmental impacts can be included in the economic models of pavement management units. The results of a simulation performed with PEIM for an urban collector road with annual average traffic of 10,000 vehicles per day and a linear density of 240 people per kilometer showed that, within the assumptions/limitations of PEIM, environmental costs were expected to range from 876,000 to 1,983,000 Canadian dollars per kilometer per year for pavement roughness ranging from 1 to 4m/km. Moreover, although noise costs are consistently disregarded in pavement management, it was expected to represent 54% of the total environmental costs when pavement roughness was above 1.75m/km. Results demonstrate that PEIM is a suitable tool for roughly estimating environmental costs and helping pavement management units to choose the optimal management alternative.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the MTQ (Ministère des Transports du Québec) for their collaboration in providing some of the data used in this study. We would also like to sincerely thank Yves Savard and Martin Boucher for their valuable help and support, and three anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported in part by a fellowship from the FQRNT (Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies).

References

Ackerman, F., and Stanton, E. A. (2012). “Climate risks and carbon prices: Revising the social cost of carbon.” Economics, 6(2012–10), 1–25.
AFSSE. (2004). Health impact of urban air pollution: Report 1, French Agency for Environmental Health Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Bendtsen, H., Lu, Q., and Kohler, E. (2010). Acoustic aging of asphalt pavements: A Californian/Danish comparison, Rep. No. UCPRC-RP-2010-01, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Bennett, C. R., and Greenwood, I. D. (2001). “Modelling road user and environmental effects in HDM-4.” The highway development and management series volume 7, World Road Association, Paris, France.
Bickel, P., Friedrich, R., Link, H., Stewart, L., and Nash, C. (2006). “Introducing environmental externalities into transport pricing: Measurement and implications.” Transp. Rev., 26(4), 389–415.
Bignal, K. L., Ashmore, M. R., Headley, A. D., Stewart, K., and Weigert, K. (2007). “Ecological impacts of air pollution from road transport on local vegetation.” Appl. Geochem., 22(6), 1265–1271.
Bouchard, M., and Smargiassi, A. (2008). Estimation des impacts sanitaires de la pollution atmosphérique au Québec: Essai d’utilisation du Air Quality Benefits Assessment Tool (AQBAT), Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.
Chan, A., Keoleian, G., and Gabler, E. (2008). “Evaluation of life-cycle cost analysis practices used by the Michigan department of transportation.” J. Transp. Eng., 236–245.
Chatti, K., and Zaabar, I. (2012). Estimating the effects of pavement conditions on vehicle operating costs, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 87.
Cucurachi, S., Heijungs, R., and Ohlau, K. (2012). “Towards a general framework for including noise impacts in LCA.” Int. J. Life Cycle Ass., 17(4), 471–487.
Davies, H., and Kamp, I. (2012). “Noise and cardiovascular disease: A review of the literature 2008–2011.” Noise Health, 14(61), 287–291.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2010, Washington, DC.
Feng, J., and Yang, W. (2012). “Effects of particulate air pollution on cardiovascular health: A population health risk assessment.” PloS one, 7(3), e33385.
Gosse, C., Smith, B., and Clarens, A. (2013). “Environmentally preferable pavement management systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 315–325.
Hanna, S. R., Briggs, G. A., and Hosker, R. P. J. (1982). Handbook on atmospheric diffusion, Technical Information Center, U.S. Dept. of Energy.
Hendriks, R., Andrews, J., Buehler, D., Small, C., Job, J., and Durnan, J. (2009). Technical noise supplement, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 355.
Hurley, F., et al. (2005). “Methodology for the cost-benefit analysis of CAFE: Volume 2: Health impact assessment.” AEA Technology Environment, Didcot, U.K.
Journard, R., et al. (2007). Emission factor modelling and database for light vehicles, Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité, Bron, France.
Kunzli, N., et al. (2000). “Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: A European assessment.” Lancet, 356(9232), 795–801.
Lepeule, J., Laden, F., Dockery, D., and Schwartz, J. (2012). “Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: An extended follow-up of the harvard six cities study from 1974 to 2009.” Environ. Health Perspect., 120(7), 965–970.
Li, W. (2005). “A comparative study of the physical mechanisms related to the source model of FHWA's traffic noise model (TNM): Measurements versus modeling assumptions.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Louisville, KY.
Menge, C. W., Rossano, C. F., Anderson, G. S., and Bajdek, C. J. (1998). FHWA traffic noise model technical manual, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 180.
Miedema, H. M. E., and Oudshoorn, C. G. M. (2001). “Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals.” Environ. Health Perspect., 109(4), 409–416.
Molemaker, R.-J., Widerberg, O., and Kok, R. (2012). Transport emissions and savings in health costs, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Navrud, S., et al. (2006). Economic values for key impacts valued in the stated preference surveys, HEATCO Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Ostro, B. (1994). Estimating health effects of air pollutants: A methodology with an application to Jakarta, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Ozbay, K., Jawad, D., Parker, N., and Hussain, S. (2004). “Life-cycle cost analysis: State of the practice versus state of the art.” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 1864, 62–70.
Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., and Mourato, S. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
Pellecuer, L. (2014). “Modelling road traffic environmental impacts toward their integration in pavement management systems.” Ph.D. thesis, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Pronello, C., and Camusso, C. (2012). “A review of transport noise indicators.” Transp. Rev., 32(5), 599–628.
Rabl, A. (1999). “Air pollution and buildings: An estimation of damage costs in France.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 19(4), 361–385.
Rabl, A., and Spadaro, J. V. (1999). “Damages and costs of air pollution: An analysis of uncertainties.” Environ. Int., 25(1), 29–46.
SAAQ. (2012). Dossier statistique—Bilan 2011, Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.
Santero, N. J., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Global warming potential of pavements.” Envir. Res. Lett., 4(3034011), 1–7.
Santero, N. J., Masanet, E., and Horvath, A. (2011). “Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55(9–10), 801–809.
Sawyer, D., Stiebert, S., and Welburn, C. (2007). “Evaluation of total cost of air pollution due to transportation in Canada.” Transport Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Staatsen, B. A. M., Nijland, H., van Kempen, E., de Hollander, A. E. M., Franssen, A. E. M., and van Kamp, I. (2004). “Assessment of health impacts and policy options in relation to transport-related noise exposures topic paper noise.” Transport related health effects with a particular focus on children—Towards an integrated assessment of their costs and benefits: State-of-the-art knowledge: Methodological aspects and policy directions, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, The Netherlands.
Stieb, D., et al. (2002). “Economic evaluation of the benefits of reducing acute cardiorespiratory morbidity associated with air pollution.” Environ. Health Global Access Sci. Sour., 1(1), 1–13.
Tong, D., Mathur, R., Schere, K., Kang, D., and Yu, S. (2007). “The use of air quality forecasts to assess impacts of air pollution on crops: Methodology and case study.” Atmos. Environ., 41(38), 8772–8784.
Van Essen, H., et al. (2011). “External costs of transport in Europe: Update study for 2008.” Technical Rep. Publication code: 11.4215.50, CE Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 161.
Venkatram, A., and Horst, T. W. (2006). “Approximating dispersion from a finite line source.” Atmos. Environ., 40(13), 2401–2408.
Weisbrod, G., Lynch, T., and Meyer, M. (2009). “Extending monetary values to broader performance and impact measures: Transportation applications and lessons for other fields.” Eval. Program Plann., 32(4), 332–341.
Wordley, J., Walters, S., and Ayres, J. G. (1997). “Short term variations in hospital admissions and mortality and particulate air pollution.” Occup. Environ. Med., 54(2), 108–116.
World Health Organization (WHO). (1999). Guidelines for community noise, Geneva, Switzerland, 160.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Burden of disease from environmental noise—Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Bonn, Germany.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution—REVIHAAP, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Bonn, Germany.
Zhang, H., Keoleian, G., and Lepech, M. (2013). “Network-level pavement asset management system integrated with life-cycle analysis and life-cycle optimization.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 99–107.
Zhang, H., Lepech, M. D., Keoleian, G. A., Qian, S., and Li, V. C. (2010). “Dynamic life-cycle modeling of pavement overlay systems: Capturing the impacts of users, construction, and roadway deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 299–309.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140Issue 10October 2014

History

Received: Nov 5, 2013
Accepted: May 19, 2014
Published online: Jun 23, 2014
Published in print: Oct 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 23, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Luc Pellecuer [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Département de génie civil, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C1K3 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Gabriel J. Assaf [email protected]
Professor, Département de génie civil, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 1K3. E-mail: [email protected]
Michèle St-Jacques [email protected]
Professor, Département de génie civil, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 1K3. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share