Technical Papers
May 29, 2014

Methodology for Critical-Gap Analysis at Intersections with Unprotected Opposing Left-Turn Movements

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 9

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for critical gap analysis at signalized intersections with unprotected opposing left-turn movements. Highway capacity manual (HCM) methodology for estimating potential capacity uses base critical gap and base follow-up time, which are adjusted to reflect specific conditions of each intersection. That methodology assumes an unobstructed line-of-sight for drivers while executing left-turn maneuvers. However, the line-of-sight is not always unimpeded. Previous studies have shown that leading noncompact (larger and taller) vehicles and vehicles in the opposing left-turn lane may impede the line-of-sight. Specifically, the studies have demonstrated that the impedance may result in a capacity reduction. In order to quantify the capacity reduction, we present a methodology to modify the HCM critical gap and follow-up time model when the line-of-sight of unprotected left turn maneuver is obstructed. We introduce new adjustment factors to account for vehicles in the opposing left-turn lane obstructing the line-of-sight during the left-turn maneuver. Using field data from Baltimore and Annapolis, Maryland, we show that the obstruction increases the left-turn critical gap and the left-turn follow-up time, and hence decreases the potential capacity for left turns at intersections with unprotected left-turn movements. This capacity reduction may be a significant contributor to systemwide delay during rush hour, and may influence dilemma zone and red light running behavior, which are subjects of future research.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted at the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research and is part of first author’s doctoral research.

References

AASHTO. (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 5th Ed., Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2011). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
Devarasetty, P. C., Zhang, Y., and Fitzpatrick, K. (2012). “Differentiating between left-turn gap and lag acceptance at unsignalized intersections as a function of the site characteristics.” J. Transp. Eng., 580–588.
Garber, N. J., and Hoel, L. A. (2009). Traffic and highway engineering, 3rd Ed., Cengage Learning, Toronto, Canada.
Gattis, J. L., and Low, S. T. (1998). “Gap acceptance at nonstandard stop-controlled intersections (FR 1059).” Mack-Blackwell National Rural Transportation Study Center, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2009). Traffic engineering handbook, 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
Jha, M. K., Karri, G. A. K., and Kuhn, W. (2011). “A new 3-dimensional highway design methodology for sight distance measurement.” Trans. Res. Rec. J. Trans. Res. Board, No. 2262, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 74–82.
Joshua, S. C., and Saka, A. A. (1992). “Mitigation of sight distance problem for unprotected left-turning traffic at intersections.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1356, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 73–79.
Kang, M. W., Shariat, S., and Jha, M. K. (2013). “New highway geometric design methods for minimizing vehicular fuel consumption and improving safety.” Transp. Res. Part C, 31(6), 99–111.
Kittelson, W. K., and Vandehey, M. A. (1991). “Delay effects on driver gap acceptance characteristics at two-way stop controlled intersections.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 154–159.
Kyte, M., Clemow, C., Mahfood, N., Lall, K. B., Khisty, J. C. (1991). “Capacity and delay characteristics of two-way stop controlled intersections.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 160–167.
McCoy, P. T., Navarro, U. R., and Witt, W. E. (1992). “Guidelines for offsetting opposing left-turn lanes on four lane divided roadways.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1356, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 28–36.
McCoy, P. T., Pesti, G., Byrd, P. S., and Singh, V. A. (1999). “Improving sight distance from opposing left-turn lanes.” Transportation frontiers for the next millennium, 69th Annual Meeting of Institute of Transportation Engineers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.
McGowen, P., and Stanley, L. (2012). “Alternative methodology for determining gap acceptance for two-way stop-controlled intersections.” J. Transp. Eng., 495–501.
Pline, J. L. (1996). “NCHRP synthesis 225. Left-turn treatment at intersections.” Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 20.
Saka, A. A. (1998). “The effect of dynamic sight distance problem on unprotected left-turn movement capacity.” J. Transp. Eng., 223–228.
Tarawneh, M. S., and McCoy, P. T. (1996). “Effect of offset between opposing left-turn lanes on driver performance.” Transportation Research Record 1523, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 61–72.
Tarawneh, M. S., and McCoy, P. T. (1997). “Guideline for offsetting opposing left-turn lanes on divided roadways.” Transportation Research Record 1579, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 43–54.
Tarawneh, M. S., Rifaey, T., and McCoy, P. T. (1998). “Effect of intersection geometrics on driver performance.” Transportation Research Circular, Int. Symp. on Highway Geometric Design Practices, Transportation Research Board in Cooperation with Federal Highway Administration and U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway capacity manual, Millennium Ed., National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Transportation Research Board. (2010). Highway capacity manual, Transportation Research Board of National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Troutbeck, R. J. (1992). Estimating the critical acceptance gap from traffic movement research Rep. 92-5, Physical Infrastructure Center, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Australia.
Yan, X., and Radwan, E. (2007). “The effect of restricted sight distance on drivers behavior during unprotected left–turn phase at signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 10(4), 330–344.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140Issue 9September 2014

History

Received: Feb 2, 2013
Accepted: Mar 17, 2014
Published online: May 29, 2014
Published in print: Sep 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hellon O. Ogallo [email protected]
Dr.Eng.
Traffic Design Engineer, Maryland State Highway Administration, Office of Traffic and Safety, Traffic Engineering Design Division, 7491 Connelley Dr., Hanover, MD 21076. E-mail: [email protected]
Manoj K. Jha, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Chief Technology Officer, Beulah-Group, 910 Southerly Rd., Suite 344, Towson, MD 21204; formerly, Professor and Director, Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Morgan State Univ., 1700 E. Cold Spring Ln., Baltimore, MD 21251 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share