Technical Papers
May 13, 2014

Impact of Pavement Roughness on Vehicle Free-Flow Speed

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 9

Abstract

To investigate the impact of changes in pavement roughness on speed, this study developed a linear regression model to estimate free-flow speed on freeways in California. The explanatory variables include lane number, total number of lanes, day of the week, region (district), gasoline price, and pavement roughness as measured by the international roughness index (IRI). Data on the California freeway network from 2000 to 2011 were used to build the model. The results showed that pavement roughness has a very small effect on free-flow speed within the range of this study. For the IRI coverage in this study (90% of the records have an IRI of three m/km or lower and 90% of the records have an IRI change of two m/km or lower), a change of IRI of one m/km (63in./mi) results in a change of average free-flow speed of approximately 0.480.64km/h (0.3–0.4 mph). This result indicated that making a rough segment of pavement smoother through application of a maintenance or rehabilitation treatment will not result in substantially faster vehicle operating speeds, and therefore the energy and emission reductions gained from the reduced rolling resistance will not be offset by increased fuel consumption from faster speeds. However, developing a good model to predict the free-flow speed was not fully successful. The southern California interstate freeway model yielded the best result with an adjusted R-squared of 0.72. For the rest of the regions in the state, the selected explanatory variables can only explain approximately half of the total variance, indicating there are still other variables with more substantial effects on free-flow speed that were not covered in this study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation and System Information, and the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies, Multi-campus Research Programs & Initiatives. The authors would also like to thank Deepak Maskey, Bill Farnbach, T. Joe Holland, and Nick Burmas of Caltrans for support and advice. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the California Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, or the University of California.

References

Archibald, R., and Gillingham, R. (1981). “A decomposition of the price and income elasticities of the consumer demand for gasoline.” South. Econ. J., 47(4), 1021–1031.
Austin, D. (2008). “Effects of gasoline prices on driving behavior and vehicle markets.”, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC.
Bennett, C. R., and Greenwood, I. D. (2002). “Modelling road user and environmental effects in HDM-4.” The Highway Development and Management Series Collection, Vol. 7, The World Road Association, Paris, France.
Burger, N. E., and Kaffine, D. T. (2009). “Gas prices, traffic, and freeway speeds in Los Angeles.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 91(3), 652–657.
California Energy Commission. (2012). “Energy Almanac.” 〈http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/gasoline/〉 (Aug. 12, 2012).
Caltrans. (1997). “Caltrans pavement priority assignment.” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
Caltrans. (2011). “Caltrans performance measurement system (PeMS).” 〈http://pems.dot.ca.gov/〉 (Jul. 18, 2011).
Caltrans. (2012a). “California highways with 70 MPH speed limits.” 〈http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/70mph.htm〉 (Aug. 15, 2012).
Caltrans. (2012b). “California road system (CRS) maps.” 〈http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_maps/〉 (Apr. 13, 2012).
Caltrans. (2013). “Caltrans photolog.” 〈http://video.dot.ca.gov/photolog/〉 (Feb. 13, 2013).
Chandra, S. (2004). “Effect of road roughness on capacity of two-lane roads.” J. Transp. Eng., 360–364.
Chatti, K., and Zaabar, I. (2012). “Estimating the effects of pavement condition on vehicle operating costs.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Cooper, D. R. C., Jordan, P. G., and Young, J. C. (1980). “The effect on traffic speeds of resurfacing a road.” Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Construction and Maintenance Division, Crowthorne, Berkshire, U.K.
Cox, J. B. (1991). “Effect of road surface condition on vehicle operating costs in Australia: Literature review and fleet database analysis.” Rep. AUSTROADS, Symonds Travers Morgan Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia.
DOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Federal Transit Administration (FTA). (2010). “2010 status of the Nation’s highways, bridges, and transit: Conditions and performance.” DOT, Washington, DC.
du Plessis, H. W. (1990). “A pilot study to determine the effect of road surface roughness on vehicle speeds.” Division of Roads and Transport Technology, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa.
Elkins, G. E., and Semrau, J. (1988). “Development of limiting velocity models for the highway performance monitoring system.” Transportation Research Record 1195, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 138–141.
Hammarström, U., Eriksson, J., Karlsson, R., and Yahya, M.-R. (2012). “Rolling resistance model, fuel consumption model and the traffic energy saving potential of changed road surface conditions.” VTI rapport 748A, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linköping, Sweden.
Ihs, A., and Velin, H. (2002). “Vägytans inverkan på fordonshastigheter (surface roughness effects on vehicle speeds).” VTI notat 40-2002, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linköping, Sweden.
Karan, M. A., Kher, R., and Haas, R. (1976). “Effects of pavement roughness on vehicle speeds.” Transportation Research Record 602, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 122–127.
Lidicker, J., Sathaye, N., Madanat, S., and Horvath, A. (2013). “Pavement resurfacing policy for minimization of life-cycle costs and greenhouse gas emissions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 129–137.
National Oceanic, and Atmospheric Administration. (2012). “National climate data center.” 〈http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/〉 (Aug. 12, 2012).
Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., Chliaoutakis, J. E., Parker, D., and Summala, H. (2006). “Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: A comparison of six countries.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 9(3), 227–242.
Pitts, R. E., Willenborg, J. F., and Sherrell, D. L. (1981). “Consumer adaptation to gasoline price increases.” J. Consum. Res., 8(3), 322–330.
Sandberg, U., and Ejsmont, J. A. (2002). Tyre/road noise reference book, InformEx, Kisa, Sweden.
Santero, N. J., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Global warming potential of pavements.” Environ. Res. Lett., 4(3), 1–7.
Sayers, M. W. (1995). “On the calculation of international roughness index from longitudinal road profile.” Transportation Research Record 1501, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–12.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway capacity manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Transportation Research Board. (2010). Highway capacity manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOE and U.S. EPA. (2012). “Driving more efficiently.” 〈http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml〉 (Aug. 12, 2012).
Wang, T., Lee, I. S., Kendall, A., Harvey, J., Lee, E. B., and Kim, C. (2012). “Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emission from pavement rehabilitation with different rolling resistance.” J. Clean Prod., 33, 86–96.
Watanatada, T., Dhareshwar, A. M., and Lima, P. R. S. R. (1987). Vehicle speeds and operating costs: Models for road planning and management, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
West, B. H., McGill, R. N., and Sluder, S. (1999). “Development and validation of light-duty vehicle modal emissions and fuel consumption values for traffic models.”, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC.
Yu, B., and Lu, Q. (2012). “Life cycle assessment of pavement: Methodology and case study.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 17(5), 380–388.
Zhang, H., Lepech, M. D., Keoleian, G. A., Qian, S. Z., and Li, V. C. (2010). “Dynamic life-cycle modeling of pavement overlay systems: Capturing the impacts of users, construction, and roadway deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 299–309.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140Issue 9September 2014

History

Received: Jul 30, 2013
Accepted: Mar 17, 2014
Published online: May 13, 2014
Published in print: Sep 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Pavement Research Center, Univ. of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
John Harvey, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Pavement Research Center, Univ. of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]
Project Engineer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Pavement Research Center, Univ. of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]
Changmo Kim, M.ASCE [email protected]
Project Engineer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Pavement Research Center, Univ. of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share