Evaluation of Dynamic Message Signs on Rural Freeways: Case Study of a Full Freeway Closure
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 1
Abstract
The evaluation of dynamic message signs (DMSs) has been challenging to undertake because of the difficulty of identifying the effects of DMSs from traffic patterns. The primary contribution of this study is the comprehensive evaluation of DMSs in a rural area during a full freeway closure by using field data, driver surveys, and simulation. A full freeway closure scenario offers an opportunity to identify the effects of DMSs, because there is a network-wide shift in traffic demand from the closed route to the alternate route(s). A unique data collection and analysis approach was used to capture regional traffic patterns, including the processing of all traffic movements from four full interchanges. A significant increase in traffic flow on the detour route and a corresponding decrease on the affected route were observed during the freeway closure. Simulation was used to isolate the benefits of DMSs from other traveler information modes such as newspaper, TV, and radio, and to explore the sensitivity of the network to different levels of driver compliance. Depending on the proportion of drivers who chose to divert based on DMSs, monetary benefits were estimated to range between US$2,394 and $65,643 for the three-day freeway closure. Driver surveys conducted during the freeway closure revealed that 57% of the drivers utilized DMS information and 41% of drivers relied solely on DMSs to obtain information related to the closure and the detour route.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2010). User and non-user benefit analysis for highways, Washington, DC.
Al-Deek, H., Venkata, S. R. C. C., and Flick, J. (2009). “Impact of dynamic message signs on satisfaction and diversion of toll road travelers.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–13.
Benson, B. G. (1996). “Motorist attitudes about content of variable-message signs.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 48–57.
Chatterjee, K., Hounsell, N. B., Firmin, P. E., and Bonsall, P. W. (2002). “Driver response to variable message sign information in London.” Transp. Res. Part C, 10(2), 149–169.
Edwards, M., and Young, R. (2009). Developing system for consistent messaging on Interstate 80’s dynamic message signs Phase I, United States Department of Transportation, Cheyenne, WY.
Hardy, A., Lee, S., and Al-Kaisy, A. F. (2006). “Effectiveness of animal advisory messages on dynamic message signs as a speed reduction tool.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 64–72.
Horowitz, A. J., Weisser, I., and Notbohm, T. (2003). “Diversion from a rural work zone with traffic-responsive variable message signage system.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 23–28.
Lee, E. B., and Kim, C. (2006). “Automated work zone information system on urban freeway rehabilitation.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 77–85.
Li, Y., Bai, Y., and Firman, U. (2010). “Determining the effectiveness of PCMS on reducing vehicle speed in rural highway work zones.” Proc., Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). (2011). “Engineering policy guide.” Section 910.3, Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), 〈http://epg.modot.mo.gov〉 (Sep. 14, 2011).
Mounce, J. M., Ullman, G., Pesti, G., and Pezoldt, V. (2007). Guidelines for the evaluation of dynamic message sign performance, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX.
Paniati, J. F. (2004). Memorandum, information and action: Dynamic message sign (DMS) recommended practice and guidance, 〈http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/res-memorandum_dms.htm〉 (Jul. 16, 2004).
Peeta, S., Ramos, J., and Pasupathy, R. (2000). “Content of variable message signs and on-line driver behavior.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 102–108.
Peng, Z. R., Guequierre, N., and Blakeman, J. C. (2004). “Motorist response to arterial variable message signs.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 55–63.
Tennessee Department of Transportation. (2011). Dynamic message signs survey, 〈http://www.tdot.state.tn.us/survey.htm〉 (May 4, 2011).
VISSIM 5.00 [Computer software]. Karlsruhe, Germany, Planung Transport Verkehr AG.
Wang, J. H., Keceli, M., and Maier-Speredelozzi, V. (2009). “Effect of dynamic message sign messages on traffic slow downs.” Proc., Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Yu, J., Park, S. Y., and Chang, G. L. (2010). “Advanced traveler information system for guiding route choice to Ocean City, Maryland.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 56–67.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140 • Issue 1 • January 2014
Pages: 89 - 98
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 23, 2012
Accepted: Aug 19, 2013
Published online: Aug 21, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 21, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.