Technical Papers
Jun 3, 2013

Safety Effects of Median Treatments Using Longitudinal Channelizers: Empirical Bayesian Before-and-After Study

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 12

Abstract

A new median treatment technique using longitudinal channelizers has been used in Florida as an alternative to the traditional permanent concrete barrier. However, the effects of the new technique on roadway safety and its economic performance have not been well documented. This paper’s intent is to present the results of a comprehensive evaluation on the safety and economic performance of the longitudinal channelizers’ median treatments with before-and-after crash data. Two types of longitudinal channelizers’ treatments—full median opening to directional median opening and full median opening to left-in only median opening—were evaluated. To account for the site selection bias, the empirical Bayesian before-and-after study method was used. The safety performance function for roadway segments with full median openings was developed with the generalized linear model to consider the negative binomial distribution of the crash counts in population entities. The targeted crash types for the longitudinal channelizers’ median treatment (the left-turn crashes) were reduced by approximately 60 and 45% in the after period for directional and left-in only median treatments, respectively. The economic performance of the longitudinal channelizers’ median treatments was quantified based on the crash analysis results from the empirical Bayesian before-and-after study. The annual cost reductions on crashes per site location were $562,321 and $94,480 for directional and left-in only median treatments, respectively. Benefit-cost ratios of 18.9–224.9 can be achieved with the implementation of longitudinal channelizers’ median treatments. Further application of longitudinal channelizers for median treatment is recommended, especially for those locations where immediate treatments for safety purpose are required.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This project was conducted under the support of the FDOT District 7. The authors thank Mr. William Riha from FDOT for providing the crash data at the locations with QK treatments and other relevant information.

References

Berry, D., and Woods, D. L. (1975). “Economy of highway median barriers.” Traffic Eng., 45(3), 9–12.
Castronovo, S., et al. (1995). The operational and safety aspects of the Michigan design for divided highways, Vol. I, Michigan State Univ. College of Engineering, East Lansing, MI.
Council, F., Zaloshnja, E., Miller, T., and Persaud, B. (2004). Crash cost estimates by maximum police-reported injury severity within selected crash geometries, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Feldman, M., Manzii, J., and Mitman, M. (2010). “Empirical Bayesianian evaluation of safety effects of high-visibility school (yellow) crosswalks in San Francisco, California.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 8–14.
Florida Dept. of Transportation. (1997). Median handbook (interim version), Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL.
Gluck, J., Levinson, H. S., and Stover, V. (1999). “Impacts of access management techniques.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Harwood, D. W., Pietrucha, M. T., and Fitzpatrick, K. (1995). “Median intersection design.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hauer, E. (1997). Observational before-after studies in roadway safety, Pergamon Press, New York.
Kach, B. (1992). The comparative accident experience of directional and bidirectional signalized intersections, Michigan Dept. of Transportation, Lansing, MI.
Liu, P., Lu, J., and Hu, F. (2007). “Headway acceptance characteristics of U-turning vehicles on 4-lane divided roadways.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 52–57.
Lu, J., Dissanayake, S., Castillo, N., and Williams, K. (2001a). Methodology to quantify the effects of access management on roadway operations and safety, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL.
Lu, J., Dissanayake, S., Castillo, N., and Williams, K. (2001b). Safety evaluation of right-turns followed by U-turns as an alternative to direct left-turns: Conflict analysis, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL.
Maki, R. E. (1996). “Directional crossovers: Michigan’s preferred left-turn strategy.” Proc., 72nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Pirinccioglu, F., Lu, J., Liu, P., and Sokolow, G. (2006). “Right turn from driveways followed by U-turn on four-lane arterials: Is it safer than direct left turn?”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 172–179.
Srinivasan, R., and Carter, D. (2011). “Development of safety performance functions for North Carolina.” Technical Rep. Prepared for North Carolina Dept. of Transportation, Univ. of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
Srinivasan, R., Ullman, G., and Finley, M. (2011). “Use of empirical Bayesianian methods to estimate crash modification factors for daytime versus nighttime work zones.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 29–38.
Transportation Engineering Inc. (1995). Collision analysis for district wide median evaluation and public involvement, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL.
Xu, L. (2001). “Right turns followed by U-turns vs. direct left-turns: A comparison of safety issue.” ITE J., 71(11), 36–43.
Zhou, H., Lu, J., Yang, X., Dissanayake, S., and Williams, K. (2002). “Operational effects of U-turns as alternatives to direct left turns from driveways.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 72–79.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139Issue 12December 2013
Pages: 1149 - 1155

History

Received: Feb 3, 2012
Accepted: May 30, 2013
Published online: Jun 3, 2013
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Huaguo Zhou, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jiguang Zhao, Ph.D. [email protected]
M.ASCE
Transportation Engineer, CH2M HILL Inc., 8735 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60631-2801. E-mail: [email protected]
P.E.
District Safety and Special Projects Engineer, Florida Dept. of Transportation, 11201 N. McKinley Dr., Tampa, FL 33612. E-mail: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ. Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share