Validating MEPDG with Tennessee Pavement Performance Data
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 3
Abstract
To implement the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) developed by AASHTO for pavement construction and rehabilitation, it is necessary to evaluate its performance prediction models using actual pavement performance data, material properties, traffic information, and environmental factors. This paper validated the MEPDG models using the performance of typical pavements in the state of Tennessee from pavement management system (PMS). With traffic and pavement structural information collected from PMS, the performance of selected highway pavement sections was analyzed with MEPDG Version 1.100 software. The predicted present serviceability index (PSI) and rutting were compared with the actual measurement values. An initial value for the international roughness index (IRI) was suggested for Tennessee highways through investigation into the actual roughness data. The dynamic moduli of asphalt mixtures for input level 1 were obtained from laboratory testing. Those for input level 3 were estimated with the Witczak model. The results show that rutting of asphalt concrete (AC) pavements was more accurately predicted at input level 1, whereas it was overpredicted at input level 3. Traffic level was found to be an important factor affecting predicted pavement roughness. It was also found that MEPDG software was relatively conservative for highway pavements with low traffic level. However, MEPDG with nationally averaged default parameters was not sensitive enough to differentiate various climates, traffic, and materials in Tennessee for the prediction of PSI.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Tennessee Department of Transportation. The authors would like to thank TDOT engineers for their help with data acquisition. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are solely responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the TDOT, nor do the contents constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
References
AASHTO. (1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structure, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
Aguiar-Moya, J., Banerjee, A., and Prozzi, J. (2010). Sensitivity analysis of the MEPDG using measured probability distributions of pavement layer thickness.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Ayyala, D., Chehab, G., and Daniel, J. (2010). “Sensitivity of M-E PDG level 2 and 3 inputs using statistical analysis techniques for New England states.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Banerjee, A., Aguiar-Moya, J., and Prozzi, J. (2009). “Texas experience using LTPP for calibration of the MEPDG permanent deformation models.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2001). Guide to LTPP traffic data collection and processing, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Infrastructure Research, Development and Technology, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, VA.
Garcia, G., and Thompson, M. (2007). “HMA dynamic modulus predictive models—A review.”, Illinois Center for Transportation, Urbana, IL.
Johanneck, L., and Khazanovich, L. (2010). “A comprehensive evaluation of the effect of climate in MEPDG predictions.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 45–55.
Li, J., Pierce, L., and Uhlmeyer, J. (2009). “Calibration of the flexible pavement portion of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for the Washington State Dept. of Transportation.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 73–83.
Li, J., Pierce, L., and Uhlmeyer, J. (2010). “Use of the AASHTO 1993 guide, MEPDG and historical performance to update the WSDOT pavement design catalog.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Mallela, J., et al. (2009). Guidelines for implementing NCHRP 1-37A M-E design procedures in Ohio, Applied Research Associates, Inc., Champaign, IL.
McKenzie, D. W., Hudson, W. R., and Lee, C. E. (1982). “The use of road profile statistics for Maysmeter calibration.”, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2004). “Guide for the mechanistic-empirical design for new and rehabilitated pavement structures.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Oman, M. S. (2010). “MnROAD traffic characterization for the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide using weigh-in-motion data.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Saxena, P., Tompkins, D., Khazanovich, L., and Balbo, J. (2010). “Evaluation of characterization and performance modeling of cementitiously stabilized layers in the MEPDG.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 111–119.
Schwartz, C. W., and Carvalho, R. L. (2007a). “Implementation of the NCHRP 1-37A Design Guide, Volume 2: Evaluation of mechanistic-empirical design procedure.”, Baltimore.
Schwartz, C. W., and Carvalho, R. L. (2007b). “Implementation of the NCHRP 1-37A Design Guide, Volume 1: Summary of findings and implementation plan.”, Baltimore.
Souliman, M., Mamlouk, M., and El-Basyouny, M. (2010). “Calibration of the AASHTO MEPDG for flexible pavement for arizona conditions.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Sunghwan, K., Ceylan, H., Gopalakrishnan, K., Smadi, O., Brakke, C., and Behnami, F. (2010). “Verification of mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) performance predictions using pavement management information system (PMIS).”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Velasquez, R., et al. (2009). “Implementation of the MEPDG for new and rehabilitated pavement structures for design of concrete and asphalt pavements in Minnesota.”, St. Paul, MN.
Witczak, M. W., Zapata, C. E., and Houston, W. N. (2006). “Models incorporated into the current enhanced integrated climatic model: NCHRP 9-23 project findings and additional changes after version 0.7.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Zapata, C. E. (2009). “Considerations of climate in the new AASHTO mechanistic empirical-pavement design guide.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139 • Issue 3 • March 2013
Pages: 306 - 312
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 7, 2011
Accepted: Aug 14, 2012
Published online: Feb 15, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.