Multinomial Logistic Regression Model for Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Collisions on Urban U.S. Highways in Arkansas
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 6
Abstract
Multivariate analysis can be used to identify the effects of several factors on the causes of a crash compared with univariate analysis. This paper uses a multivariate-analysis technique, the multinomial logistic regression (MLR) model, to examine the differences in crash-contributing factors for six collision types for both divided- and undivided-highway nonjunctions, given that a crash has occurred. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate (1) single-vehicle and (2) multivehicle collisions, which included (1) angular, (2) head-on, (3) rear-end, (4) sideswipe-same-direction, and (5) sideswipe-opposite-direction collisions. The risks associated with different collision types were found to be significantly influenced by various vehicle actions. The risk of sideswipe-same-direction collisions was higher while changing lanes and merging on undivided and divided highways. Similarly, while merging, drivers were prone to angular collisions, and when slowing down to rear-end collisions on undivided and divided highways. On weekdays, there was higher risk of multivehicle collisions, whereas on weekends, single-vehicle collisions were found to be statistically significant. The risk of single-vehicle collisions attributable to drivers negotiating a curve, driving on a wet road surface, during nighttime, when vision was obscured, avoiding objects on the roadway, and driving under the influence of alcohol was higher compared with that of other collision types. On the basis of the results of the analysis, it was found that the risk of single-vehicle collisions was higher on divided and undivided highways compared with other collision types. Further, binary logistic regression model was used to identify the factors that contribute to crash-injury severity, given that a crash has occurred. Drivers and passengers who did not wear lap and shoulder belts, and drove under the influence of alcohol were involved in serious crash injuries. Drivers involved in a crash on horizontal and vertical curves were prone to severe crash injuries compared with crashes on straight and level roadways. Head-on and single-vehicle collisions were found to be at a higher risk for severe injuries compared with other collision types. Additionally, collision types were strongly related to driver behavior (decision making) parameters, such as merging, changing lanes, and slowing/stopping, compared with parameters such as roadway geometry, atmospheric conditions, and surface conditions. From these results, the importance of different statistical techniques is evident, as the significant variables varied for crash severity and different collision types.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Mack-Blackwell Rural Transportation Center (MBTC) and the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, which also provided the data sets. The writers acknowledge the three anonymous reviewers for their very valuable comments, which greatly improved the paper quality. Mr. Srinadh Kandada’s help in analyzing the data is also appreciated.
References
Abdel-Aty, M., and Abdelwahab, H. (2004). “Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of drivers’ visibility and light truck vehicle using a nested logit structure.” Accid. Anal. Prev.AAPVB5, 36(3), 447–456.
Abdel-Aty, M., and Radwan, A. E. (2000). “Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement.” Accid. Anal. Prev.AAPVB5, 32(5), 633–642.
Bishop, Y. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Blincoe, L. et al. (2002). “The economic impact of motor vehicle crashes.” NHTSA Technical Rep., National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
Elvik, R. (1995). “The safety value of guardrails and crash cushions: A meta-analysis of evidence from evaluation studies.” Accid. Anal. Prev.AAPVB5, 27(4), 523–549.
Elvik, R., and Myssen, A. (1999). “Incomplete accident reporting: Meta-analysis of studies made in 13 countries.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1665, 133–140.
Hauer, E., and Hakkert, S. (1989). “The extent and some implications of incomplete crash reporting.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1185, 1–10.
Hosmer, D. W. Jr., and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Javvadi, S. B. (2010). “Crash casual factors: Crash frequency, crash severity, and crash collision models.” M.S. thesis, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO.
Jones, I. S., and Whitfield, R. A. (1988). “Predicting injury risk with new car assessment program crashworthiness ratings.” Accid. Anal. Prev.AAPVB5, 20(6), 411–419.
Jonsson, T., Lyon, C., Ivan, J. N., Washington, S., Schalkwyk, I. D., and Lord, D. (2009). “Investigating differences in the performance of safety performance functions estimated for total crash count and for crash count by crash type.” (CD-ROM), Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Kim, D., Washington, S., and Oh, J. (2006). “Modeling crash types: New insights into the effects of covariates on crashes at rural intersections.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 132(4), 282–292.
Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C., and Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models, 4th Ed., McGraw Hill/Irwin series, New York.
Lui, K.-J., McGee, D., Rhodes, P., and Pollock, D. (1988). “An application of a conditional logistic regression to study the effects of safety belts, principal impact points, and car weights on drivers’ fatalities.” J. Saf. Res.JSFRAV, 19(4), 197–203.
Pande, A., and Abdel-Aty, M. (2009). “A novel approach for analyzing severe crash patterns on multilane highways.” Accid. Anal. Prev.AAPVB5, 41(5), 985–994.
Poch, M., and Mannering, F. L. (1996). “Negative binomial analysis of intersection accident frequencies.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 122(2), 105–113.
Savolainen, P. T., and Tarko, A. P. (2005). “Safety impacts at intersections on curved segments.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1908, 130–140.
Shankar, V., and Mannering, F. L. (1996). “An exploratory multinomial logit analysis of single-vehicle motor cycle accident severity.” J. Saf. Res.JSFRAV, 27(3), 183–194.
Shankar, V. N., Mannering, F. L., and Barfield, W. (1995). “Effect of roadway geometrics and environmental conditions on rural accident frequencies.” Accid. Anal. Prev.AAPVB5, 27(3), 371–390.
Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., and Koch, G. G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Yan, X., Radwan, E., and Abdel-Aty, M. (2005). “Characteristics of rear-end accidents at signalized intersections using multiple logistic regression model.” Accid. Anal. Prev.AAPVB5, 37(6), 983–995.
Ye, F., and Lord, D. (2011). “Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: Multinomial logit, ordered probit and mixed logit models.” (DVD-ROM), Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 6 • June 2012
Pages: 786 - 797
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 20, 2010
Accepted: Oct 27, 2011
Published online: Nov 3, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012
Published ahead of production: Jun 15, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.