Unified Approach for Uncertainty Analysis Using the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of uncertainty management for the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). Specifically, development of an all-inclusive approach to uncertainty management in which model uncertainty and input parameter variability are taken into consideration is presented in this paper. A Gaussian process surrogate model is chosen in this paper as a potential model for the MEPDG design software, and model verification metrics are included to assess the ability of the surrogate model to predict MEPDG output. The construction of a surrogate model that emulates the MEPDG will reduce the computational expense for uncertainty analysis but will introduce another source of uncertainty. Uncertainty propagation of these major sources of uncertainty is performed for a case study. The relative effects of these three major sources of uncertainty are investigated, and the influences of these sources of uncertainty are discussed utilizing the results from the uncertainty propagation. Reliability analysis incorporates the proposed methodology to investigate the effect of these sources of uncertainty for a typical flexible pavement design.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Alsherri, A. (1988). “Reliability model for pavement performance.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 114(3), 294–306.
Bichon, B. J. (2010). Efficient surrogate modeling for reliability analysis and design, Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN.
Darter, M., Khazanovich, L., Yu, T., and Mallela, J. (2005). “Reliability analysis of cracking and faulting prediction in the new mechanistic-empirical pavement design procedure.” Transportation Research Record 1936, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 150–160.
Forrester, A. I. J., Sobester, A., and Keane, A. J. (2008). Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide, Vol. 9, Wiley, New York.
Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S. (2000). Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design, Wiley, New York.
Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 07458.
Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2004). “Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” Washington, DC.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) and Transportation Research Board. (2009). “NCHRP design guide welcome page.” NCHRP 1-37A Design Guide Software, 〈http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/mepdg/home.htm〉 (Sep. 2009).
Nielsen, B. H., Søren, N. L., and Søndergaard, J. (2007). DACE, A Matlab Kriging toolbox.” 〈http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/~hbn/dace/〉 (Nov. 7, 2007).
Pierce, L. (2007). “Reliability in the MEPDG: One states perspective.” Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 〈http://design.transportation.org/Documents/ReliabilityintheMEPDGonestatesperspective(Pierce).pdf〉 (Jan. 2007).
Rebba, R., and Mahadevan, S. (2006). “Model predictive capability assessment under uncertainty.” AIAA J.AIAJAH, 44(10), 2376–2384.
Rebba, R., and Mahadevan, S. (2008). “Computational methods for model reliability assessment.” Reliability Eng. Syst. SafetyRESSEP, 93(8), 1197–1207.
Rebba, R., Mahadevan, S., and Huang, S. (2006). “Validation and error estimation of computational models.” Reliability Eng. Syst. SafetyRESSEP, 91(10–11), 1390–1397.
Retherford, J. Q., and McDonald, M. (2010). “A study of reliability methods applicable to mechanistic-empirical pavement design method.” Transportation Research Record 2154, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 130–137.
Retherford, J. Q., and McDonald, M. (2011). “Estimation and validation of gaussian process surrogate models for MEPDG-based sensitivity analysis and design optimization.” Transportation Research Record 2226, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 119–126.
Thyagarajan, S. (2009). “Improvements to strain computation and reliability analysis in the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” Ph.D. thesis, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA, 〈http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Dissertations/Spring2009/s_thyagarajan_0042309.pdf〉 (May, 2009).
Thyagarajan, S., Muhunthan, B., Sivaneswaran, N., and Petros, K. (2011). “Efficient simulation techniques for reliability analysis of flexible pavements using the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 137(11), 796–804.
Timm, D., Birgisson, B., and Newcomb, D. (1998a). “Variability of mechanistic-empirical flexible pavement design parameters.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, 1, Vejdirektoratet, Vejteknisk Institut, Denmark.
Timm, D., Birgisson, B., and Newcomb, D. (1998b). “Development of mechanistic-empirical pavement design in Minnesota.” Transportation Research Record 1629, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 181–188.
Timm, D. H., Newcomb, D. E., and Galambos, T. V. (2000). “Incorporation of reliability into mechanistic-empirical pavement design.” Transportation Research Record 1730, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 73–80.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 5 • May 2012
Pages: 657 - 664
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 15, 2011
Accepted: Sep 12, 2011
Published online: Sep 14, 2011
Published in print: May 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.