Data Analysis of Diversion and Dynamic Message Signs
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 9
Abstract
Dynamic message signs (DMS) are used in conjunction with other media to communicate traffic conditions, general information, and recommended diversion strategies to motorists. This study uses loop detector data from Richmond, Virginia, to estimate diversion rates attributable to DMS advisory messages on Interstate 95 where Interstate 295 is available as a comparable alternate route, thus evaluating DMS effectiveness in traffic diversion without major concerns of added trip time or quality of the alternate route. The impacts of existing message strategies are investigated to determine those messages that maximize diversion for specific circumstances. Analysis is performed for various message types for the scenario of an incident on the primary freeway, I-95, encouraging diversion of I-95 traffic to an alternate route (I-295). Results show trends where the usage of particular words in messages is more effective than others in causing diversion, and recommendations are made to create a more effective message that promotes diversion.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the opportunity given by the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Virginia Transportation Research Council to conduct this study. Specifically, they thank Catherine McGhee, Michael Fontaine, Robb Alexander, Paula Lewis, Mike Washburn, Dan Dunnavant, Thomas Schinkel, and Richard Bush, and staff of the Smart Travel Lab at the University of Virginia.
References
Dudek, C. L., and Ullman, G. L. (2006). Dynamic message sign message design and display manual, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Huo, H., and Levinson, D. (2006). “Effectiveness of DMS using empirical loop detector data.” California PATH Working Paper UCB-ITS-PWP-2006-4, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Jacob, C., and Abdulhai, B. (2006). “Automated adaptive traffic corridor control using reinforcement learning.” Transportation Research Record 1959, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–8.
Peeta, S., and Ramos, J. (2006). “Driver response to variable message signs-based traffic information.” IEEE Proc. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, New York, 153(1).
Peeta, S., Ramos, J., and Pasupathy, R. (2000). “Content of variable message signs and on-line driver behavior.” Transportation Research Record 1725, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 102–108.
Ran, B., Barrett, B., and Johnson, E. (2004). Evaluation of variable message signs in Wisconsin: Driver survey, Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation, Research, Development & Technology Transfer, Madison, WI.
Schiesel, R., and Demetsky, M. J. (2000). “Evaluation of traveler diversion due to en-route information.” UVACTS-14-13-28, Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center (MAUTC) Research, Charlottesville, VA.
University of California, Los Angeles. (2009). “An Overview of SPSS GLM.” : Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group, 〈http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/library/sp_glm.htm〉 (Feb. 1, 2009).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137 • Issue 9 • September 2011
Pages: 608 - 614
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 16, 2010
Accepted: Feb 17, 2011
Published online: Feb 19, 2011
Published in print: Sep 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.