Performance Evaluation of No Track Thermoplastic Traffic Markings
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 11
Abstract
No track thermoplastic is a relatively new thermoplastic traffic marking material which can be installed on newly constructed asphalt pavement shortly after finishing paving operations. The main objectives of this study are (1) to develop a test procedure that can be used to determine whether a thermoplastic traffic marking is a no track thermoplastic traffic marking and (2) to run field tests to obtain performance data through real applications of industry-proclaimed no track thermoplastic traffic markings. Sixteen transverse lines were installed in the field for performance evaluation. The research team measured several parameters in the field such as appearance, retroreflectivity, and color. By comparing the testing parameters between no track and regular thermoplastic traffic markings, the research team intended to select a parameter that can be used to develop technical specifications to help decision makers define no track thermoplastic traffic markings. It was found that the best parameters that can be used to define a no track thermoplastic traffic marking were the CIELAB value and the CIE94 color tolerance . These two parameters were proposed by the International Commission on Illumination and have been used extensively for measuring color differences. As compared to other testing parameters, the change of these two parameters with time is more consistent and the selected no track thermoplastic traffic markings produced significantly lower and values as compared to the regular thermoplastic traffic marking. The research results have the potential to be used by decision makers to develop technical specifications to guide the real engineering applications of no track thermoplastic traffic markings.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was sponsored by the FDOT and China’s National Science and Technology Plan of Action for Traffic Safety (Project No. UNSPECIFIED2009BAG13A07-5). The assistance is greatly appreciated. The writers also would like to thank the Graduate Research Assistants at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of University of South Florida for their assistance in field data collection and data reduction.
References
ASTM. (2007a). “Standard test method for measurement of retroreflectivity of pavement marking materials with CEN-prescribed geometry using a portable retroreflectometer.” D 1710, West Conshohochen, Pa.
ASTM. (2007b). “Standard test method for color and color difference measurement by tristimulus (filter) colorimetry.” E 1347, West Conshohochen, Pa.
ASTM. (2007c). “Standard specification for color of pavement marking materials.” D 6628, West Conshohochen, Pa.
ASTM. (2007d). “Standard practice for calculation of color tolerances and color differences from instrumentally measured color coordinates.” D 2244, West Conshohochen, Pa.
FDOT (2007a). Florida standard specifications for road and bridge construction, Dept. of Transportation, Florida.
FDOT. (2007b). Florida method of test for field evaluation of traffic marking materials, Dept. of Transportation, Florida.
Irtishad, A., Najafi, T. N., Benham, J. L., and Lancaster, P. D. (2001). An investigation into application and bonding strengths of thermoplastic pavement markings on concrete asphaltic roadway surfaces, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, Fla.
Jacobs, G. J., and Johnson, N. L. (1995). “Yellow pavement marking with yellow nighttime color.” Transportation Research Record. 1495, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 147–155.
Kopf, J. (2004). “Retroreflectivity of pavement markings: Analysis of retro-retroreflectivity degradation curves.” Final Rep., Research Record. T1803, Washington State Transportation Center, Washington, D.C.
Migletz, J., Fish, J. K., and Graham, J. L. (1994). Roadway delineation practices handbook: FHWASA-93-001, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Migletz, J., Graham, J. L., Harwood, D. W., and Bauer, K. M. (2001). “Service life of durable pavement markings.” Transportation Research Record. 1749, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 13–21.
NCHRP. (2002). “Long-term pavement marking practices: A synthesis of highway practices.” Synthesis 306, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Scheuer, M., Maleck, T. L., and Lighthizer, D. R. (1997). “Paint-line retroreflectivity over time.” Transportation Research Record. 1585, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 53–63.
Thomas-Meyers, G., Nagy, A. L., and Khan, M. (2003). “Pavement marking color specifications.” Paper Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2009
Accepted: Apr 28, 2010
Published online: Oct 15, 2010
Published in print: Nov 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.