Impact of Bead Density on Paint Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 8
Abstract
This paper addresses the impact of bead density on paint pavement marking retroreflectivity. The writers collected retroreflectivity data and glass bead images on 40 segments of two-lane highways. Bead density is defined as the surface percentage of glass beads exposed above the paint marking material. Numerous methods for determining bead density were considered and studied. A new approach, referred to as a computer-aided counting method, was developed and a bead density analysis program was written. The program was used to analyze 108 images to obtain a bead density value for each image. A correlation study was conducted between pavement marking retroreflectivity and bead density. The findings of the study show that the normal range of glass bead density for older markings is 9–24% of the paint marking surface area. Furthermore, bead density values have a positive correlation with marking retroreflectivity readings; higher bead density leads to higher retroreflectivity. White paint markings have significantly higher retroreflectivity values than do yellow markings when the bead density values are the same.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers acknowledge the sponsorship of this research by the NCDOT. The writers would especially like to thank Mr. Chris Howard, Ms. Meredith McDiarmid, and Mr. Mark Manriquez of the NCDOT for their support during this study. Still, the contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers, who are responsible for the data and results presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NCDOT.
References
Abboud, N., and Bowman, B. L. (2002). “Cost and longevity-based scheduling of paint and thermoplastic striping.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1794, 55–62.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 5th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 294–295.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2007). “Standard specification for glass beads used in traffic paint.” M247-07, Washington, D.C.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM). (2001). “Standard practice for describing retroreflection.” ASTM E808, West Conshohocken, Pa.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM). (2005). “Standard test method for measurement of retroreflective pavement marking materials with CEN-prescribed geometry using a portable retroreflectometer.” ASTM E1710-05, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Andrady, A. L. (1997). “Pavement marking materials: Assessing environment-friendly performance.” NCHRP Rep. No. 392, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Craig, W. N., Sitzabee, W. E., Hummer, J. E., and Rasdorf, W. (2007). “Impact of line location on pavement marking retroreflectivity degradation.” Public Works Management and Policy, 12(2), 431–450.
Dale, J. M. (1998). “Pavement markings: Materials and application for extended service life.” NCHRP Synthesis No. 138, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2003). Standard specifications for construction of roads and bridges on federal highway projects, United States Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2007). Updates to research on recommended minimum levels for pavement marking retroreflectivity to meet driver night visibility needs, United States Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Gonzalez, R. C., Woods, R. E., and Eddins, S. L. (2003). Digital image processing using Matlab, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Lee, J., Maleck, T. L., and Taylor, W. C. (1999). “Pavement marking material study in Michigan.” Inst. Transp. Eng. J., 69(7), 44–50.
Migletz, J., and Graham, J. (2002). “Long-term pavement marking practices.” NCHRP Synthesis No. 306, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Mizera, C., Smadi, O., Hawkins, N., and Zitterich, W. (2009). “Pavement marking application: A bead gun evaluation study using a high-speed camera.” Transportation Research Board (TRB) Annual Meeting 2009 (DVD-ROM), Paper No 09-2540.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). (2006). “Standard specifications for roads and structures.” NCDOT Rep., Raleigh, N.C.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). (2008). Pavement marking rodeo certification study guide, Work Zone Traffic Control Unit, NCDOT, Raleigh, N.C.
Perrin, J., Jr., Martin, P. T., and Hansen, B. G. (1998). “A comparative analysis of pavement marking materials.” Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 1998 (CD-ROM), Paper No. 98130, Washington, D.C.
Rasdorf, W., Zhang, G., and Hummer, J. (2009). “The impact of directionality on paint pavement marking retroreflectivity.” Public Works Management and Policy, 13(3), 265–277.
Rich, M. J., Maki, R. E., and Morena, J. (2002). “Development of a pavement marking management system.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1794, 49–54.
Sarasua, W. A., Clarke, D. B., and Davis, W. J. (2003). “Evaluation of interstate pavement marking retroreflectivity.” Rep. No. FHWA-SC-03-01, Dept. of Transportation, S.C.
Sitzabee, W., Hummer, J., and Rasdorf, W. (2009). “Pavement marking degradation modeling and analysis.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 15(3), 190–199.
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). (2008). 2008 pavement marking certification study guide, VDOT, Richmond, Va.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 14, 2009
Accepted: Dec 18, 2009
Published online: Dec 28, 2009
Published in print: Aug 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.