Spatial Allocation of Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions at the City Scale
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 6
Abstract
Greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting for individual cities in large metropolitan areas is confounded by spatial scale and boundary effects that impact the allocation of transportation fuels used for surface transport and airline travel. This paper expands on a demand-based methodology to spatially allocate transportation fuel use (surface and airline) among colocated cities in the United States that are part of a larger metropolitan area commutershed on the basis of demand for surface vehicle miles traveled (VMT) exerted by individual cities. By using travel demand models for metropolitan planning organizations, the demand method was first applied as part of the city of Denver’s GHG inventory in 2005 to develop a material flow analysis (MFA) of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel consumption at the city scale. This paper reports on the application of the same method to six major metropolitan regions across the United States and a detailed analysis of all 27 cities within the larger Denver metro region. The analysis of six metropolitan areas in the United States demonstrated (1) the demand method produces VMT estimates allocated to cities across the commutershed that are similar (within 6%) to the boundary-limited polygon approach (linear correlation coefficient ; slope ); (2) airline travel allocation by vehicular trip count ratios to the regional airport from colocated cities produces results similar to regional airline travel allocation by population ratios (linear correlation coefficient ; slope ); and (3) the method is replicable with necessary data available from all cities in this study through their corresponding metropolitan planning organizations. In addition, the demand-VMT allocation method is found to be more responsive to future simulated mass transit growth. Further, the method is sensitive to local travel demand features of the individual cities, of which employment intensity was found to have the largest impact on per capita VMT allocated to a city. Within the Denver commutershed, daily VMT per capita estimates ranged from 13–129 km/capita/day (8–80 mi/capita/day) among the 27 communities, with a strong positive correlation with employment intensity (employment/capita; ) and employment density (employment/kilometer; ).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Best Foot Forward Ltd. (BFF). (2007). “Personal stepwise.” 〈http://www.bestfootforward.com/personalstepwise.html〉 (Nov. 1, 2007).
City of Seattle. (2007). “2005 inventory of Seattle greenhouse gas emissions: Community and corporate.” Office of Sustainability and Environment. 〈http://www.seattle.gov/climate/〉 (Sep. 4, 2007).
Decker, E., Elliott, S., Smith, F., Blake, D., and Rowland, F. (2000). “Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem.” Annual Rev. Energy Environment, 25, 685–740.
Denstadli, J. (2004). “Impacts of videoconferencing on business travel: The Norwegian experience.” J. Air Transp. Manage., 10(6), 371–376.
Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG). (2001). “Workforce commuting patterns.” 〈http://www.drcog.org/〉 (Jul. 22, 2007).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2008). “Consumption, price, and expenditure estimates—State energy data system.” 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/hf.jsp?incfile=sep_sum/plain_html/sum_use_tot.html〉 (Jul. 24, 2008).
EPA. (2002). “Updating fuel economy estimates in Mobile 6.3.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/omswww/models/mobile6/p02005.pdf〉 (Aug. 4, 2008).
EPA. (2007). “Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2005.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html〉 (Aug. 24, 2007).
Ewing, R. (1995). “Beyond density, mode choice, and single-purpose trips.” Transp. Quarterly, 49(4), 15–24.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2006). “Highway statistics series: Functional travel system—2005.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/vm02.cfm?vm_year=2005〉 (Jul. 27, 2008).
Frank, L., and Pivo, G. (1995). “Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: SOV, transit and walking.” Transportation Research Record 1466, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Golob, T., and Brownstone, D. (2005). “The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption.” Univ. of California Energy Institute.
Greenprint Denver. (2007). “City of Denver climate action plan: Final recommendations to Mayor Hickenlooper.” 〈http://www.greenprintdenver.org/docs/DenverClimateActionPlan.pdf〉 (Jul. 28, 2007).
Heede, R. (2006). “Aspen greenhouse gas emissions 2004.” Climate Mitigation Services 〈http://www.aspenglobalwarming.com/pdf/emission_inventory_2004.pdf〉 (Aug. 12, 2008).
ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability. (2003). “Clean air and climate protection software (CACPS).” 〈http://www.cacpsoftware.org/〉.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan.
Kockelman, K. (1995). “Which matters more in mode choice: Income or density?” Institute of Transportation Engineers 65th Annual Meeting 〈www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/incmdens.zip〉 (Sep. 15, 2008).
Kuzmyak, R., and Pratt, R. (2003). “Land use and site design: Traveler response to transport system changes.” Transit Cooperative Research Program Rep. 95, Chapter 15, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Litman, T., and Steele, R. (2008). Land use impacts on transport: How land use factors affect travel behavior, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Louis Berger Group. (2004). “Emissions benefits of land use planning strategies. Appendix D—Land use characteristics and travel variable elasticities.” Technical Rep. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Cary, NC.
National Research Council (NRC). (2004). “Materials count: The case for material flows analysis.” Committee on Material Flows Accounting of Natural Resources, Products, and Residuals and Committee on Earth Resources, Washington, DC.
Ramaswami, A., et al. (2007). “Greenhouse gas inventory for the city and county of Denver.” 〈http://www.greenprintdenver.org/docs/Denver_GHG_Inventory_Report.pdf〉 (Aug. 21, 2008).
Ramaswami, A., Hillman, T., Janson, B., Reiner, M., and Thomas, G. (2008). “A demand-centered hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(17), 6455–6461.
Rodriguez, D., Targa, F., and Aytur, S. (2006). “Transport implications of urban containment policies: A study of the largest twenty-five US metropolitan areas.” Urban Stud., 43(10), 1879–1897.
Strait, R., Roe, S., Bailie, A., Lindquist, H., and Jamison, A. (2007). “DRAFT Colorado greenhouse gas inventory and reference case projections 1990-2020.” Center for Climate Strategies, Washington, DC.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2006). “Kyoto protocol.” 〈http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php〉.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). “State and county quickfacts.” 〈http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/〉 (Nov. 10, 2008).
U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. (2005). 〈http://www.usmayors.org/climateprotection/〉 (Sep. 17, 2007).
Vande Weghe, J., and Kennedy, C. (2007). “A spatial analysis of residential greenhouse gas emissions in the Toronto census metropolitan area.” J. Ind. Ecol., 11(2), 133–144.
Wolman, A. (1965). “The metabolism of the city.” Sci. Am., 213, 178.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 25, 2009
Accepted: Nov 16, 2009
Published online: Dec 21, 2009
Published in print: Jun 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.